Isn't it amazing how long it took the Dems to throw Big Slick under the bus?

So now, November, 2017, the Dems have finally turned on Slick Willy and finally consider him to be a liability. During the 1990's they couldn't support him strongly enough. Blow jobs (not really sex?) in the Oval Office, sex with an intern, several accusations of rape from his past and all the Dems rallied around the pervert in the WH.

Bot today, when it is fashionable to jump on a guy for past sexual sins, they can't get rid of him quickly enough. Getting rid of Slick also means getting rid of Ms Slick, too.

It's all about money. in the 1990's he was raising gobs of cash for the DNC. Renting out the Lincoln bedroom for $50,000 a night. Raising money left and right for the DNC. Today all the money he is raising Slick and wife in name only keep for themselves.

Today Slick is a liability and the DNC is throwing him under the bus.

Good riddance, I say, but for different reasons than the DNC.

Yes, it is

Wag more said:

So now, November, 2017, the Dems have finally turned on Slick Willy and finally consider him to be a liability. During the 1990's they couldn't support him strongly enough. Blow jobs (not really sex?) in the Oval Office, sex with an intern, several accusations of rape from his past and all the Dems rallied around the pervert in the WH.

Bot today, when it is fashionable to jump on a guy for past sexual sins, they can't get rid of him quickly enough. Getting rid of Slick also means getting rid of Ms Slick, too.

It's all about money. in the 1990's he was raising gobs of cash for the DNC. Renting out the Lincoln bedroom for $50,000 a night. Raising money left and right for the DNC. Today all the money he is raising Slick and wife in name only keep for themselves.

Today Slick is a liability and the DNC is throwing him under the bus.

Good riddance, I say, but for different reasons than the DNC.

Click to expand...

So. . .how long will it take for the Republicans, especially the " Evangelical Christians!" to recognise that they have elected a sexual addict, a molester, and that they are ready to elect a pedophile in Alabama?

Yes, Bill Clinton behaved in a stupid manner . . .but at least, they were willing . . . and adultes!

Hypocrisy is well established in the GOP. . .and pointing fingers does not absolve what is happening today in the ruling party to make the US a laughing stock of the world!

Openmind said:

So. . .how long will it take for the Republicans, especially the " Evangelical Christians!" to recognise that they have elected a sexual addict, a molester, and that they are ready to elect a pedophile in Alabama?

Yes, Bill Clinton behaved in a stupid manner . . .but at least, they were willing . . . and adultes!

Hypocrisy is well established in the GOP. . .and pointing fingers does not absolve what is happening today in the ruling party to make the US a laughing stock of the world!

Click to expand...

Some were willing I guess.

Open(not)mind brought up an interesting topic: hypocrisy.
Does anyone remember the feminazis reaction to Anita Hill? They went thru the roof with anger and hate and accusations in spite of the fact there was no evidence. They even said, the evidence is less important than the seriousness of the charge.
The Big Slick got blow jobs from a female intern while on the job in the Oval Office. And he left evidence. And the feminazis said nothing. Nada. Zilch. Zachimilko. Zero. This is the epitome of hypocrisy.
React with everything you got at a conservative but say nothing when it's a lib/prog/sec/hum guilty of much worse and with evidence. And while he was on the clock and in the Oval Office.
And how about the way the lib media and every lib in Congress tried to take the moral high ground when Bush poured water on some Mohammedans. They called it TORTURE. (pouring water on someone is torture, yeah right).
At the same time they all supported the slaughter of unborn humans in the womb. They supported ripping off the baby's arms and legs and smashing their heads and poisoning the human, just cuz it hadn't made it out of the womb yet. These libs that screamed about Bush's water "torture" had no problems slaughtering the most innocent of our society in a gruesome manner, all in the name of "Choice".
As far as I know, no Trump accuser has claimed they were raped or even coersced. Not so with Big Slick. Several accusations of rape. And then there was Monica, a young and impressionable intern, charmed by a charismatic president into letting the pervert in the WH stick his dick in her mouth and fill it with his semen. All this while supposedly married.
Conservatives are no saints but, in the case of Willy the Hill Billy the lib/prog/sec/hums cornered the market on hypocrisy.

Wag more said:

hypocrisy.

Click to expand...

Okay.... maybe something interesting here. Hypocrisy in politics is normal. Sex and politics is normal. Shrill people yelling about others sexual peccadillos is normal, however, within all of your post above there seems (I hope) to be a kernel of an idea trying to get out, could you drop all the embellishments and hyperbola and develope your thoughts a bit further? Is your though process aimed at those trying to attain positions of power and influence or those that have achieved their position of power or those that having attained it strike out at the "system" through which they had to manoeuvre in order to attain it? Or is it something else - what is the motivation?

Wag more said:

Open(not)mind brought up an interesting topic: hypocrisy.
Does anyone remember the feminazis reaction to Anita Hill? They went thru the roof with anger and hate and accusations in spite of the fact there was no evidence. They even said, the evidence is less important than the seriousness of the charge.
The Big Slick got blow jobs from a female intern while on the job in the Oval Office. And he left evidence. And the feminazis said nothing. Nada. Zilch. Zachimilko. Zero. This is the epitome of hypocrisy.
React with everything you got at a conservative but say nothing when it's a lib/prog/sec/hum guilty of much worse and with evidence. And while he was on the clock and in the Oval Office.
And how about the way the lib media and every lib in Congress tried to take the moral high ground when Bush poured water on some Mohammedans. They called it TORTURE. (pouring water on someone is torture, yeah right).
At the same time they all supported the slaughter of unborn humans in the womb. They supported ripping off the baby's arms and legs and smashing their heads and poisoning the human, just cuz it hadn't made it out of the womb yet. These libs that screamed about Bush's water "torture" had no problems slaughtering the most innocent of our society in a gruesome manner, all in the name of "Choice".

HYPOCRISY, HYPOCRISY, HYPOCRISY.​

As far as I know, no Trump accuser has claimed they were raped or even coersced. Not so with Big Slick. Several accusations of rape. And then there was Monica, a young and impressionable intern, charmed by a charismatic president into letting the pervert in the WH stick his dick in her mouth and fill it with his semen. All this while supposedly married.
Conservatives are no saints but, in the case of Willy the Hill Billy the lib/prog/sec/hums cornered the market on hypocrisy.

Click to expand...

Wrong all the way.
Trump was accused of raping several women, including a minor aged 13. The fact that those suits were "dropped" (sometimes due to serious threat to the accuser's life) doesn't mean they are not true. Trump should face trial.

In 1994, Trump went to a party with Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire who was a notorious registered sex offender, and raped a 13-year-old girl that night in what was a "savage sexual attack," according to a lawsuit filed in June 2016 by "Jane Doe." The account was corroborated by a witness in the suit, who claimed to have watched as the child performed various sexual acts on Trump and Epstein even after the two were advised she was a minor.

"Immediately following this rape Defendant Trump threatened me that, were I ever to reveal any of the details of Defendant Trump’s sexual and physical abuse of me, my family and I would be physically harmed if not killed," Jane Doe wrote in the lawsuit, filed in New York.

The lawsuit was dropped in November 2016, just four days before the election, with Jane Doe's attorneys citing "numerous threats" against her.


During a court deposition, Ivana Trump—Donald's first wife and mother to Eric, Donald Jr. and Ivanka—accused the president of raping her in 1989. The private account was described in former Newsweekreporter Harry Hurt III’s 1993 book, Lost Tycoon. It details the alleged "violent assault," in which Trump pulled out fistfuls of his ex-wife’s hair after receiving a painful operation on his scalp.

"He jams his penis inside her for the first time in more than sixteen months," Hurt wrote. "Ivana is terrified.… According to versions she repeats to some of her closest confidants, 'he raped me.'"

Ivana walked back her allegations against Trump after his lawyers insisted she write the following statement at the beginning of her book, according to The New York Times: "During a deposition given by me in connection with my matrimonial case, I stated that my husband had raped me. I referred to this as a 'rape,' but I do not want my words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense."

A former Trump business associate, Jill Harth, claimed in a 1997 lawsuit the New York real estate mogul “attempted rape” and groped her without her consent on various occasions. In the suit, Harth described a violent encounter at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort, in which Trump allegedly threw her against the wall of one of his children’s bedrooms before lifting up her dress.

"It was a shocking thing to have him do this, because he knew I was with George [her partner], he knew they were in the next room," she recalled in an October 2016 interview with The Guardian. "How could he be doing this when I'm there for business?"

Newsweek

If Bill Clinton got a BJ in the white house from an (adult) intern, then it must be OK to have a president who openly admits to "grabbing pussies" and seems to think it's OK as long as the grabber has power.

Seems to me our standards of presidential behavior are quite low.