A Guide to Obama Supporters

Federal Farmer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
922
A guide to Obama supporters

How to identify an Obama supporter: As you are navigating your daily business, you may come across Obama supporters. They have been known to attack (mostly verbal threats and ad hominem) unprovoked. Preferring thought over emotion and facts over slogans is something of a blasphemous crime to an Obama supporter. In addition, if you should form an opinion about Obama without his express permission, you may be accused of being a racist. The purpose of this guide is to help you identify Obama supporters before they get the chance to dampen your day.

It should be noted that there are several species of Obama supporters.

O’Zombies: With glazed eyes and vacant stares, these subdued types can generally be found online. Their speech consists of incoherent rehashes of Obama phrases and, “like” and “y’know”. After having surrendered most cognitive ability to be used as seen fit by the Obama campaign, they generally possess just barely enough to be able to upload a video to Youtube. However, some aren’t so lucky and eventually starve to death having forgotten how to eat. They are not particularly dangerous, often not even aware of your presence when you are standing next to one. Some have suggested that merely being near one or watching their videos can be detrimental to one’s IQ. Avoidance recommended.

Obamatons: Also known as obamabots. Ever since Lenin nurtured the first breeds of useful idiots, communists have continually strived to create better useful idiots - ones that were stronger, faster, more useful than the previous generation. The obamaton is one which has been upgraded to the predictability of a machine. The obamaton seeks out communications relevant to Obama on the internet then responds. There are only two known responses. If the obamaton detects a statement which is positive regarding Obama, the obamaton will respond with requests for money. If the obamaton detects a statement which is negative or even neutral regarding Obama, the obamaton will respond by shrieking “RACIST!” repeatedly. Obamatons are only found online. They are sometimes known as “trolls”. The fact that they have yet to have a spine installed prevents offline activity.

O’lattes: To understand an O’latte, you must put yourself in his shoes. An O’latte believes he’s better than everyone else. And while he enjoys sneering at poor people and chastizing those who dare to question his supreme intellect, he is somewhat depressed. “Why can’t the world be more like me?” he wonders. Then, like a ray of sunlight, Obama appears. “Hey, he thinks he’s better than everyone else just like me!” exclaims the O’latte. Finally, the O’latte finds hope, knowing he is no longer alone in his narcissism. O’lattes are not dangerous, but nevertheless extremely annoying.

Obombers: These are Obama’s enforcers. Brutish and mute, these not-so-gentle giants have been known to become physically aggressive. While their actions range from roughing up old women at rules commitees to blocking camera shots for Fox News, they invariably use force. Little is known what motivates them to serve Obama unquestioningly. Some speculate that Obama supplies them with a daily ration of gruel and they reward him with unfaltering loyalty. They are moderately dangerous.

Yeswecans: Hailing from the make-believe land of Yesweca, these Obama supporters live in a fantasy world. In that world, Obama can heal the sick, stop wars by waving his hand, fly, summon unicorns, and coat the landscape with Obama-rectal derived pixie dust. When they are suddenly torn from their parallel dimension and thrown into our world, (known as reality), they tend to exhibit wild mood swings and the negative behaviors which often accompany them. For the most part, they have a surreally optimistic view of Obama and bubble with enthusiasm. However, when confronted with Obama’s mortal enemies, facts and logic, they will lash out in defense of their deity. There have been many speculations as to the true nature of Yeswecans. Some opine that Yeswecans are best understood as cultists, (see: The Church of Obamism), while still others suggest the root to be a mental disorder, (see: Obamitis). Regardless of the cause, Yeswecans can be extremely dangerous and should be avoided whenever possible.

Obamelites: They’ve turned politics into a business and Obama is their cash cow. A number of super-delegates fit this mold. They generally cluster around Obama in a protective swarm and rarely consort with the “little” people. They are almost never seen in public but often on TV. Because of their rarity in public, they are not much of a threat in terms of individual controntation. But regarding the power they intend to wield as a bludgeon, they have great potential to damage America as a whole. In addition, they are known to betray former supporters/supportees on the turn of a dime, or, perhaps more accurately, in exchange for a dime. They should never be trusted.

Under normal circumstances, I would not assume that anyone reaches an opinion through a character flaw or extreme ignorance. But Obama supporters are an exception. Obama supporters continually slander and verbally bully those who dare to think differently than they. That is a clear indication of a character flaw. Obama supporters often know much less about their own candidate (not to mention history and geography) than the average person on the street that doesn’t even follow politics. Then there are the Obamelites. Pure greed. I suggest that Obama supporters support their Marxist candidate for personal flaws because none have yet given me another reason. If there is an Obama supporter out there with another reason, I’d love to meet that person.

And with that said, I do sympathize with Obama supporters. Some of them are Americans too (I don’t count the communists), even when they’ve lost their way. Indeed, I can only imagine their horror when they find out they’ve willfully supported a madman. As the buyer’s remorse spreads, undoubtedly many more will. Let’s be sure to catch them when they fall, not for the Democratic party, not for the Republican party, but for America.
 
Werbung:
So what one am I ?

And with that said, I do sympathize with Obama supporters. Some of them are Americans too (I don’t count the communists), even when they’ve lost their way. Indeed, I can only imagine their horror when they find out they’ve willfully supported a madman. As the buyer’s remorse spreads, undoubtedly many more will. Let’s be sure to catch them when they fall, not for the Democratic party, not for the Republican party, but for America.

Don't worry PFOS, we'll catch you. top gun and the rest though, I'm going to laugh my a$$ off when their boy goes SPLAT!!!
 
Don't worry PFOS, we'll catch you. top gun and the rest though, I'm going to laugh my a$$ off when their boy goes SPLAT!!!

You could be right... but my money is on you'll be bailing like Sihouette did for some sudden "health related" issue the day after the election. We will see my friend, we will see.;)

OBAMA / BIDEN 08
 
your going to catch me? realy cuz all I have seen is more and more reason to stay away from the Repubilcan party...After all Obama did not pull to his side...McCain Pushed me there.

Hope you enjoy the biggest spending increase ever, added to the largest tax increase ever.
 
Hope you enjoy the biggest spending increase ever, added to the largest tax increase ever.

Obama will mostly target the rich right?

Bring in that nice old socialism communism

Class envy stuff

So it shouldn’t effect too many libs, they will reap from what obama steals from those who made it.

Reminding them of tax increases might make them drool with hope that they can steal from those horrible rich folks.
 
After all Obama did not pull to his side...McCain Pushed me there.

I'm afraid I'm in a rather similar position. I could not, in good conscience, vote for McCain - despite the fact that I think he'd probably make a decent leader, it's where he plans to lead us that has me worried.

And I can't, in good conscience, vote for Obama, because I don't know where he plans to lead us.

And I can't, in good conscience, not vote.

I might wind up going third party this year. The Libertarian candidate is a stiff that few libertarians are happy with, and the Green Party has split between the McKinney camp (the actual chosen Green candidate) and the Nader camp (he decided to run by himself, without the party's nomination). Anyway, McKinney is one of those "Impeach Bush!" idiots, so I wouldn't be able to vote for her. And Ralph Nader remains...well, Ralph Nader. There aren't any other third parties I'm even interested in.

Basically, 2008 sucks.
 
I'm afraid I'm in a rather similar position. I could not, in good conscience, vote for McCain - despite the fact that I think he'd probably make a decent leader, it's where he plans to lead us that has me worried.

And I can't, in good conscience, vote for Obama, because I don't know where he plans to lead us.

And I can't, in good conscience, not vote.

I might wind up going third party this year. The Libertarian candidate is a stiff that few libertarians are happy with, and the Green Party has split between the McKinney camp (the actual chosen Green candidate) and the Nader camp (he decided to run by himself, without the party's nomination). Anyway, McKinney is one of those "Impeach Bush!" idiots, so I wouldn't be able to vote for her. And Ralph Nader remains...well, Ralph Nader. There aren't any other third parties I'm even interested in.

Basically, 2008 sucks.


Bob Barr and Ralp Nader will get more votes this time than ever before. It makes me so dang mad that in all of this great nation, for all of the qualified people out there. THIS IS WHAT THEY SERVE US


the whole election should go in the Conspiracy thread
 
Obama will mostly target the rich right?

Bring in that nice old socialism communism

Class envy stuff

So it shouldn’t effect too many libs, they will reap from what obama steals from those who made it.

Reminding them of tax increases might make them drool with hope that they can steal from those horrible rich folks.

Do not be fooled. If we look at Obama's own promises we will see:

Of the 188 new spending proposals he has promises, the $300 billion price tag only covers 111 proposals. There are another 77 proposals with unknown cost estimates that will add billions to this number.

This new spending, if enacted, would represent an almost 10% increase over the President’s FY 2009 budget.

To put this in perspective, this $300 billion spending proposals would cost more than 42 states’ budgets combined (general fund expenditures). It is more than the United States spent last year on imported oil ($294 billion net). It is more than 60% larger than any one-year federal spending increase, ever.

Senator Obama has promised to pay for his record new spending increases with a tax increase on families making $250,000 and over. However, this increase would only yield $225 billion over 5 years, a far cry short of the $1.4 trillion required under his new spending plan. So we will need to raise taxes on the middle-class and small businesses, or deficit spend.

According to CBO, President Clinton’s 1993 tax increase raised taxes $240.6 billion over five years. The late Senator Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) called it the “largest tax increase in the history of public finance in the United States or anywhere else in the world.” But this proposal will increase spending $300 billion in a single-year!

To finance the first year of this proposed spending ($300 billion), Congress would need to increase taxes on the top 1% of taxpayers by 57%. Under that scenario, taxpayers with incomes over $365,000 would see a tax hike of at least $40,300 on top of what they currently pay! That is simply not realistic. So if Congress decides to widen the pool of taxpayers footing the bill

They would have to raise taxes on the top 5% by 38%; or the top 10% by 32%; or the top 25% by 26%; or the top 50% of taxpayers by 23%. The top 50% of American taxpayers, who already pay 96.9% of all federal income taxes, are those who earn $31,000 (AGI) or more.

But we are not just looking at new spending. He also wants to balance the budget and stop spending the Social Security Surplus. If he follows through with these promises it would mean:

The average taxpayer earning $62,000 would see their income tax bill rise $5,300 (61%); or

The average taxpayer earning $104,000 would see their income tax bill rise by $12,300(74%)

The average taxpayer earning $365,000 would see their income tax bill rise by an astounding $93,500 (132%)!

Keep in mind all these tax increases would be on top of the:

$2,300 tax increase 43 million families will feel when the current tax policy expires,

$2,200 tax increase seniors will experience when the current tax policy expires, and

$4,100 tax increase small business will have to pay when the current tax policy expires.
 
Biggest spending ? you mean the last 8 years?

No, I mean the additional few trillion that Obama has already promised to add to current spending on the campaign trail. At least if Obama wins, Bush will only be the 2nd biggest spender in US history.

Or you mean the tax cut for the middle class? Obama has talked about?

Oh no, I remember this, I also remember how it is impossible to pay for his programs without deficit spending, even though he promises to balance the budget, but by doing so will result in what I state above.
 
Werbung:
Do not be fooled. If we look at Obama's own promises we will see:

Of the 188 new spending proposals he has promises, the $300 billion price tag only covers 111 proposals. There are another 77 proposals with unknown cost estimates that will add billions to this number.

This new spending, if enacted, would represent an almost 10% increase over the President’s FY 2009 budget.

To put this in perspective, this $300 billion spending proposals would cost more than 42 states’ budgets combined (general fund expenditures). It is more than the United States spent last year on imported oil ($294 billion net). It is more than 60% larger than any one-year federal spending increase, ever.

Senator Obama has promised to pay for his record new spending increases with a tax increase on families making $250,000 and over. However, this increase would only yield $225 billion over 5 years, a far cry short of the $1.4 trillion required under his new spending plan. So we will need to raise taxes on the middle-class and small businesses, or deficit spend.

According to CBO, President Clinton’s 1993 tax increase raised taxes $240.6 billion over five years. The late Senator Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) called it the “largest tax increase in the history of public finance in the United States or anywhere else in the world.” But this proposal will increase spending $300 billion in a single-year!

To finance the first year of this proposed spending ($300 billion), Congress would need to increase taxes on the top 1% of taxpayers by 57%. Under that scenario, taxpayers with incomes over $365,000 would see a tax hike of at least $40,300 on top of what they currently pay! That is simply not realistic. So if Congress decides to widen the pool of taxpayers footing the bill

They would have to raise taxes on the top 5% by 38%; or the top 10% by 32%; or the top 25% by 26%; or the top 50% of taxpayers by 23%. The top 50% of American taxpayers, who already pay 96.9% of all federal income taxes, are those who earn $31,000 (AGI) or more.

But we are not just looking at new spending. He also wants to balance the budget and stop spending the Social Security Surplus. If he follows through with these promises it would mean:

The average taxpayer earning $62,000 would see their income tax bill rise $5,300 (61%); or

The average taxpayer earning $104,000 would see their income tax bill rise by $12,300(74%)

The average taxpayer earning $365,000 would see their income tax bill rise by an astounding $93,500 (132%)!

Keep in mind all these tax increases would be on top of the:

$2,300 tax increase 43 million families will feel when the current tax policy expires,

$2,200 tax increase seniors will experience when the current tax policy expires, and

$4,100 tax increase small business will have to pay when the current tax policy expires.

ugh..

well he did say he would give up in iraq and use that money for college loans
so we will still be borrowing money from china but at least we can give it to the morons in higher education

your list was so depressing

I hope Obama does not get elected, but then again if he doesnt another will. we have to help people understand the government is not your mother or your bank
 
Back
Top