Another Republican sex offender nabbed

[Pandora]

Well you thought wrong, Republican House leadership knew for months, if not years, of pedophile Mark Foley's sexually explicit communications with underage pages yet covered it up. Sorry but I don't consider call that dropping him like a "hot potato."

Foley coverup timeline

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/01/washington/01foley.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

oh I am sorry Popeye, I didnt mean the leadership I mean the people. I have little to no faith in either partys leaders. I think they are all seedy.

I mean when a republican does something disgusting, "usually" the people of the party shun him or her, and wont vote for them and dont defend the things they did.

and the people of the democrat party does defend exc.


not the leaders, they all suck in my book. Sorry for the missunderstanding

 

[UShadItComing]

We know that John McCain knew what was going on but is there any evidence to prove that McCain was joining with Foley, Delay, and Hastert to play with the little boys too? Or were McCain's 'extracurricular' activities restricted to his girlfriend, what's her name? The one that's in hiding now.

 

[UShadItComing]

oh I am sorry Popeye, I didnt mean the leadership I mean the people. I have little to no faith in either partys leaders. I think they are all seedy.

I mean when a republican does something disgusting, "usually" the people of the party shun him or her, and wont vote for them and dont defend the things they did.

and the people of the democrat party does defend exc.


not the leaders, they all suck in my book. Sorry for the missunderstanding

OH no ya don't! It doesn't work with adults the same way it works with your school friends!

 

[Andy]

Why wouldn't you vote for Larry Craig Andy? Are you holding his wide stance agaisnt him. Have faith in the man because I heard Hannity the other night defend him of that awful trumped up charge of trying to get the cop to play boy/boy games in a washroom with him.

Americans cops! What can I say?

No I would not. And I disagree with Sean Hannity. Anything else you like to ask about?

 

[Andy]

Right. The liberal Republicans reelected Bush, after it became obvious that he stood for big government and fiscal irresponsibility. Of course, he did keep his **** in his pants (so far as we know, anyway), so that makes him OK.

Bush passed a tax cut I benefitted from. Further, Kerry openly supported more government, and more irresponsibility, and also would have lost us the war. So yeah I supported Bush.

 

[UShadItComing]

No I would not. And I disagree with Sean Hannity. Anything else you like to ask about?

So you are holding Larry's wide stance against him? Shirley you don't believe that he was trying to do boy/boy things with a police officer!!!!!

 

[Andy]

Get over it Abomination, these are your informative years and you're creating a political illusion for yourself which is going to hold you back for the rest of your life.

Learn to listen more and evaluate opinions on both sides because what you have to offer others right at the moment is completely worthless.

This coming from someone who has completely lost every argument you have ever been in on this forum thus far. Even in this post, you don't make a single substantive point. The whole thing is ad homin and subjective.

 

[UShadItComing]

This coming from someone who has completely lost every argument you have ever been in on this forum thus far. Even in this post, you don't make a single substantive point. The whole thing is ad homin and subjective.

Yes of course Andy, you are right again. And I'm so sorry that I can't find the proper link to show that Alberta has cheaper car insurance than BC. And I'm sorry that the commie pinko WHO said your country was #37 for healthcare. And I'm sorry that anyone would say anything bad that you don't like because it's simply not true.

Commies!

 

[Pandora]

Well you thought wrong, Republican House leadership knew for months, if not years, of pedophile Mark Foley's sexually explicit communications with underage pages yet covered it up. Sorry but I don't consider call that dropping him like a "hot potato."

Foley coverup timeline

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/01/washington/01foley.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

OK a new story on the wire can work for a good example (I think)


After denying the affair and the child, today Edwards admits the affair and the child are his.

He also admits that his own staffers could have been paying her hush money, though he personally never did.

So here is a case of the Dems higher up knowing about this yet saying and doing nothing, also Edwards was not asked to speak at the DNC. Unless they knew about the (about to explosed affair) why would they take such a promanent dem off the speaking list?

Then this comes to mind. You posted a story a while back about when McCain came back from being a POW for 5 years, he left his wife who got fat and married Cindy.


Now it seems that Edward who was never a POW or any other tramadic thing has been sleeping around on his...... over weight and how do you word it??? riddled with cancer? wife who has term. cancer.

Would you say what Edwards has done is as wrong as McCain or is there a reason his story should get a pass?

 

[Andy]

Well you thought wrong, Republican House leadership knew for months, if not years, of pedophile Mark Foley's sexually explicit communications with underage pages yet covered it up. Sorry but I don't consider call that dropping him like a "hot potato."

You still don't get the idea of the base of the party? I'm talking about the people of the party, not the politicians. Politicians are scummy. All of them. The moment someone runs for office, I automatically assume they are pretty scummy people. Every single one. Very very very very rare have I found a politician that wasn't dirtier than a california used car salesman, or a socialist in canada.

It's the voting people that I refer too. For example. If a Republican was to drive an under age intern from a drinking party, off the end of a bridge, and walk home while she lays at the bottom of the river... I would not vote for him! Nor would ANY Republican voters.

Now if a Liberal did that? He'd be voted into the Senate 5 times, for more than 38 years.

The idea that scummy people ignore each others faults, isn't surprising to me. The fact the liberal VOTERS are willing to ignore any and all immoral or illegal actions, and still vote for their scum bags, is amazing. Republican voters are not like that. They don't vote for people that bad.

I wager that the Detroit Mayor could run again and win.

I bet even John Edwards could win. Why? Because liberal voters will take anyone that does nearly anything, even if they lie under oath and rape campaign workers.

 

[Popeye]

OK a new story on the wire can work for a good example (I think)


After denying the affair and the child, today Edwards admits the affair and the child are his.

He also admits that his own staffers could have been paying her hush money, though he personally never did.

So here is a case of the Dems higher up knowing about this yet saying and doing nothing, also Edwards was not asked to speak at the DNC. Unless they knew about the (about to explosed affair) why would they take such a promanent dem off the speaking list?

Then this comes to mind. You posted a story a while back about when McCain came back from being a POW for 5 years, he left his wife who got fat and married Cindy.


Now it seems that Edward who was never a POW or any other tramadic thing has been sleeping around on his...... over weight and how do you word it??? riddled with cancer? wife who has term. cancer.

Would you say what Edwards has done is as wrong as McCain or is there a reason his story should get a pass?

I've read the story and there is one clear difference...Edwards isn't running for anything. Had Edwards secured the nomination it would have the same relevance as McCain's infidelity but since he didn't it's of little or no consequence except to his family.

 

[UShadItComing]

Andy wrote:

Very very very very rare have I found a politician that wasn't dirtier than a california used car salesman, or a socialist in canada.

That's very, very, very, very, very, very, very true except for the socialist bit and you already know that Canada doesn't have any of those. Remember, it's the US with all the socialists who are bailing out failed corps as they go down faster than an American whore's pants on payday.

 

[Andy]

So you are holding Larry's wide stance against him? Shirley you don't believe that he was trying to do boy/boy things with a police officer!!!!!

I have no idea. I wasn't there, and I didn't see the evidence. Here's what I do know, he lied about whatever it was. When I get a police officer in my face, I say exactly the truth. If it were left to me, and I had to vote, I would not vote for him. That's it.

Now, all this other stuff, you can maul it over all you want.

 

[Andy]

Andy wrote:

That's very, very, very, very, very, very, very true except for the socialist bit and you already know that Canada doesn't have any of those. Remember, it's the US with all the socialists who are bailing out failed corps as they go down faster than an American whore's pants on payday.

You just lied. At least tell the truth when it's obvious, otherwise you are not really worth talking to.

 

[UShadItComing]

I have no idea. I wasn't there, and I didn't see the evidence. Here's what I do know, he lied about whatever it was. When I get a police officer in my face, I say exactly the truth. If it were left to me, and I had to vote, I would not vote for him. That's it.

Now, all this other stuff, you can maul it over all you want.

Some day you ought to get around to telling us who you 'would' vote for so we can have another good laugh. Ron Paul right?

(snicker)