1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Beckel: Why McCain Can't Win

Discussion in 'U.S. Politics' started by The Scotsman, Apr 25, 2008.

  1. The Scotsman

    The Scotsman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,624
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    South of the Haggis Munching Line
    April 22, 2008
    Why McCain Can't Win
    By Bob Beckel

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/why_mccain_cant_win.html

    For Sen. John McCain this is the best of times. His Democratic opponents ravage each other across Pennsylvania in a political reenactment of the Battle of Gettysburg. He has taken presidential-style trips to foreign capitals and a nostalgic journey from Annapolis to Sedona. He is finally raising money. Even better, his party's base has switch from attacking him to attacking ministers, flag pins, and 60s radicals a few years short of assisted living.

    Yet with all these calm political winds in his sails, John McCain will not be elected president. What lies before McCain are the gathering forces of a perfect political storm that is quietly building into a Category 5 giant. Yet his campaign advisors and the Straight Talk press corps, basking in the calm eye of this storm, seem oblivious to the intensity of the political maelstrom just over the horizon.

    The collision of history, the current political climate, and the forces of the conservative right are the seeds that will lay waste to McCain's White House bid. While history and the political climate of 2008 are forces beyond McCain's power to change, the right, which is the most damaging ingredient in the storm, could have been beaten. Instead McCain has done something anathema to John McCain: He has surrendered.

    To understand McCain's political dilemma begin with McCain's 42.5% RCP Average. Compare that to Obama's 45.5%, despite having endured the toughest days of his campaign to date. Those numbers alone (at least for those who understand politics) underscore the depth of John McCain's political dilemma.

    Ironically, it is McCain's own errors, not Obama's skill, which will be responsible for his political obituary. From the early days of 2007 Democrats feared John McCain more then any other Republican. McCain's image as an independent politician, often at odds with his own party, and a history of seeking and often achieving bipartisan consensus in an increasingly polarized Congress, were and are attractive assets to voters in 2008.

    After McCain lost the 2000, he campaigned relentlessly for the President Bush's reelection in 2004. McCain also became the most steadfast (although at times critical) supporter of the Iraq war. McCain sought rapprochement with such right wing zealots as Jerry Falwell, a man McCain once called "an agent of intolerance." Having initially opposed them, McCain embraced the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.

    To pacify the Republican right, McCain rejected his own bipartisan legislative efforts. He abandoned the McCain/Kennedy immigration bill that might have avoided massive GOP Hispanic defections. He turned his back on the McCain/Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act. McCain walked away from a climate change bill crafted with Republican Sen. John Warner and Democratic/Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman.

    What McCain failed to realize was that the right had no intention of embracing him. He had simply spent too many years challenging their out-of-touch agenda. Without conservative support, the press assumed McCain could not win the nomination and his campaign would collapse. Which it nearly did.

    By the summer of 2007 McCain was all but politically dead. But he refused to quit. He returned to New Hampshire to revive the independent, straight talking image that had attracted the state's independents and moderate Republicans in 2000. In a stunning upset, McCain won and then won again in South Carolina. And he won only with the help of independents and moderate Republicans, despite active opposition from the right.

    That opposition kicked into high gear as McCain closed in on the nomination in Florida. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Ann Coulter, to name but a few, asked their listeners and readers to end McCain's candidacy then and there. They failed.

    But for some inexplicable reason, after winning Florida and becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, McCain once again abandoned his maverick image and returned to courting the right. McCain accepted a televised interview with Sean Hannity. I talked to Hannity after the interview. He told me, correctly, that he had gotten McCain to commit to the Bush tax and economic policies; back off the McCain/Kennedy immigration solution; and to nominate conservative Supreme Court justices.

    The court promise was remarkable since it was McCain's efforts in the bipartisan "Gang of 14" that had avoided an all-out war in the Senate over Bush's judicial nominees. McCain had also publicly admonished Bush's Supreme Court nominee, Samuel Alito, for wearing "his conservative ideology on his sleeve," further inflaming the right. In a massive flip-flop McCain later spoke at the annual Washington gathering of conservatives (CPAC) promising to appoint future Supreme Court nominees in the mold of Alito.

    Today, McCain still pays lip service to bipartisanship and attempts to hold on to some semblance of his maverick/independent image by campaigning in the black ghettoes of New York and the poverty-ridden Appalachians. Lacking unified Democratic opposition and fortified by an adoring press, McCain has been able to maintain this transparent shadow of his former image. That will end soon when the Democrats have a nominee who will draw attention to McCain's near total embrace of the Bush agenda.

    To make matters worse, McCain's capitulation to the right has forced him to remain silent while Barack Obama has absconded with the anti-Washington, post-partisanship image. That image, once owned by John McCain, is the most powerful message among swing voters who will determine the next president.

    By so doing, McCain has also abandoned the one weapon that might have overcome the historical and anti-Republican climate in 2008. It is that very McCain message which will gain Obama the Democratic nomination and likely the White House. McCain is now forced to convince the voters that another four years of Bush policies is exactly what the country needs. Democrats, prone to let victory slip away, should give thanks that the reactionaries on the right are still in charge of the Republican agenda.

    Although there remains the slim possibility that Obama could lose the campaign over his relationships with his minister and a 60s radical or insensitivity to the lower middle class, it is unlikely. In a perverse way those same attacks used against Obama in the Philadelphia debate last week are giving Obama spring training and conditioning for the coming Republican offensive. Obama will be prepared for the assault, and with plenty of money to fight back.

    Bob Beckel managed Walter Mondale’s 1984 presidential campaign. He is a senior political analyst for the Fox News Channel and a columnist for USA Today. Beckel is the co-author with Cal Thomas of the book "Common Ground."

    .............................................................................

    I was just wondering how many democrats would opt for McCain in light of the acrimony developing between the Obama and Clinton camps? Its not really a case of one "prefering" clinto over Obama more of "I hate Clinton" or "I could'nt vote for Obama"! I guess what I'm trying to same is that the article points out the basic weaknesses of McCain's campaign but the cracks are more than evident in the Dem camp upon which the Republicans are making great press!
     
  2. KingClovis

    KingClovis New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Beckel the Pundit is full of crap most of the time, but he's right here. McCain won't win, unfortunately. It's time for the Democrats to steer America through the many storms that rock her world.:mad:
     
  3. foggedinn

    foggedinn New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    335
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All very sophisticated, rational, well reasoned arguements.

    Six months ago, any of ten different democrats seeking the nomination would have made the analysis correct.

    For whatever reason, the democrats are on the verge of nominating the only democrat who could lose. I don't see any point in being sophisticated about this. Obama will lose because he's black.

    As much as many want to believe that we have moved beyond such petty prejudices, we haven't.
     
  4. KingClovis

    KingClovis New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not so sure about that. Whites today are obsessed with self-hatred. Their collective guilt is so intense, sometimes I think they sub-consciously want to be persecuted, if not exterminated. :mad:
     
  5. Truth-Bringer

    Truth-Bringer New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is complete and total B.S. The majority of people in the country are against the McCain/Kennedy amnesty bill. And the Campaign Finance reform bill is hardly a blip on the radar screen when you ask most voters what their major concerns are. This country isn't liberal or collectivist. That's what these liberal pundits can't get through their pea brains. If America was liberal, then the Democrats should have an easy time winning Presidential elections, yet this just doesn't happen too often, and their only recent victor, Bill Clinton, never won with a majority vote and lost Congress in one of the biggest landslides in history.

    The only reason Americans have ever been swayed by liberalism is because liberal politicians have used money in the form of government benefits, etc. to buy them off.
     
  6. bokile

    bokile New Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    200
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    Because he supplied terrorist Albanians with the weapons:eek:
     
  7. Libsmasher

    Libsmasher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,151
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Lessee - McCain can't win because he refuses to morph himself into a liberal?
     
  8. Bunz

    Bunz New Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,215
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Alaska
    He is the closest thing to a liberal in the GOP. Refuses to morph himself into a liberal, that is a good one. Unfortunatly, everyone sees through his half a$$ed attempts at being a conservative.
     
  9. Libsmasher

    Libsmasher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,151
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It doesn't take much to "see" that a liberal isn't a conservative. :D
     
  10. Bunz

    Bunz New Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,215
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Alaska
    Well McCain is certainly trying to "be" one of those :D
     
Loading...

Share This Page