1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

"Charitable libs"

Discussion in 'U.S. Politics' started by Libsmasher, Jun 6, 2008.

  1. Libsmasher

    Libsmasher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,151
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
  2. Here We Go

    Here We Go New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That is terrible. The more I learn in this room, the more disenchanted I am with the majority of politicians. They should know we'll find out their dirty little secrets and lies. But, it is obvious they don't seem to care.
     
  3. Libsmasher

    Libsmasher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,151
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is why people should never let government control the net (like in the PRC ant colony). What makes it invincible is exactly that uncontrolled nature. The net is certainly the greatest technological innovation in my lifetime so far.
     
  4. GenSeneca

    GenSeneca Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    6,245
    Likes Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    ={CaLiCo}= HQ
    Global Poverty Act: 845 billion dollar pricetag

    War on Poverty? Mission Accomplished!

    Its nice to know we have completely eradicated Poverty in America. There are no homeless, hungry or disadvantaged at all - thanks to Liberals giving away other peoples money.

    ..And we have so much money left over from ending that "War", we can send it, and more, to other nations! After all, that makes more sense than reducing unnecessary and burdensome taxes... doesn't it? :confused:
     
  5. PLC1

    PLC1 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    9,862
    Likes Received:
    473
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The Golden State
    Oh, goodie, the war on poverty gone global. That could cost the taxpayers as much as the so called war on terror.

    Is there even one politician who has some understanding of fiscal responsibility? We are just ending one of the most liberal administrations in history, and now are about to elect yet another, regardless of who wins the election.
     
  6. 9sublime

    9sublime Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    2,620
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Bristol
    Yay, lets group all the "liberals" together, just like how I know all right wingers are quite happy to be grouped with the KKK and Fred Phelps.

    That article is pathetic.
     
  7. Libsmasher

    Libsmasher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,151
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Liberals are the LAST people to talk about grouping - to them, the political spectrum is liberals, moderates (liberal republicans), and "the far right" (ie, anyone to the right of say Arlen Spector).
     
  8. PLC1

    PLC1 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    9,862
    Likes Received:
    473
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The Golden State
    Your one dimensional left to right overly simplistic political model is leading you astray.

    There are so many definitions of the terms "liberal" and "conservative" as to render the terms meaningless.

    There are several political continuums. The big government to limited government is one that is usually seen as liberal to conservative. The libertarian to authoritarian continuum is a little more troubling, as the very people who call themselves conservative typically favor more authoritarianism, which means more government power.
     
  9. GenSeneca

    GenSeneca Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    6,245
    Likes Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    ={CaLiCo}= HQ
    I know of roughly 38 in the House and about 13 in the Senate (Ron Paul is unfortunately not one of them)... Which leaves the fiscally responsible outnumbered 10-1 in the House (38-397) and 8-1 (13-87) in the Senate.

    You said it....

    [​IMG]

    The budget may not survive the next president.

    Conversely, far too many people that call themselves Libertarians are Anarchists, who consider any level of authority oppressive.
     
  10. PLC1

    PLC1 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    9,862
    Likes Received:
    473
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The Golden State
    Yes, anything can be taken to extremes. The point is that there is no such thing as a simple conservative to liberal continuum with most people somewhere in the middle. There are many unrelated issues.
     
  11. GenSeneca

    GenSeneca Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    6,245
    Likes Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    ={CaLiCo}= HQ
    I created the term CaLiCo as a result of exactly what your talking about. Capitalist, Libertarian, Conservative... pretty well plots out where my priorities are on the political scale and which politicians/policies I find palatable.
    ------------------------------------------------

    Now back to your regularly scheduled program, already in progress:

    The "Charitable Libs" with special guest Thomas Sowell.

    Excerpt from: Who Really Cares? by Thomas Sowell

    Anecdotally, this is certainly true for liberals that I know well. They are so self absorbed, the idea that they should give money to a legitimate charity (as opposed to some bum on the street), or anything else for that matter, goes against their entitlement mentality. (I'm talking about family too, not random strangers I think might-possibly-be Liberals)
     
  12. Pandora

    Pandora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,790
    Likes Received:
    257
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The people's republic of Eugene
    It seems to me that Lib’s are not only tight with their money when it comes to charity but they are also when it comes to politics.

    There is a site called fund race. I paid very close attention to it during the 2004 elections.

    The biggest loud mouths like Barbara Streisand and Susan Sarandon gave so little, actually Barbara gave 1000 to each Dem running and Susan gave zero, and her husband matched her zero. Most all of the big mouths gave little to nothing to their party. I looked in my area, and people around here (a pretty lower income to middle class income area) gave tons more than any of the rich loud mouths.

    I think the rich liberal snobs think taking their time to tell us to be charitable is their contribution in their own eyes.

    I especially get frustrated over the Obama’s, who openly advocate some of us have to give up some of our pie to give to others who do not have any pie, while they are doing pretty damn ok. And giving less than 1 percent of their pie, (and only in a political year)
    And that 1 percent went to their racist church! But we should be happy to give up what we work so hard for without argument.
     
  13. Andy

    Andy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,497
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What really blew me away reading that was... obviously I'm not a Democrat or a Liberal... but... uh last year... I gave more to charity than half of the people on that list, and I made only $17K last year. Is that a riot or what?
     
  14. 9sublime

    9sublime Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    2,620
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Bristol
    You are only proving my original point. YOU are the one who is stuck in a mentality of grouping people into little boxes by what they believe on other issues.
     
  15. Libsmasher

    Libsmasher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,151
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm a "grouper", because I identify people who group. Hmmm :rolleyes: errrr uhhhhhh, OK, If you say so. (?) :confused:
     
Loading...

Share This Page