Defending the 2nd amendment, gotta love it

dogtowner

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Messages
17,849
Location
Wandering around
touche !

turnabout IS fair play. Yay capitalism !


Firearms Companies Restricting Sales to Government Agencies in Areas That Restrict Gun Rights





A growing number of firearm and firearm-related companies have stated they will no longer sell items to states, counties, cities and municipalities that restrict their citizens' rights to own them.
According to The Police Loophole, 34 companies have joined in publicly stating that governments who seek to restrict 2nd Amendment rights will themselves be restricted from purchasing the items they seek to limit or ban.
Extreme Firepower Inc., located in Inwood, WV has had a longstanding policy that states:
"The Federal Government and several states have enacted gun control laws that restrict the public from owning and possessing certain types of firearms...If a product that we manufacture is not legal for a private citizen to own in a jurisdiction, we will not sell that product to a law-enforcement agency in that jurisdiction."
York Arms, located in Buxton, ME released a statement following new legislation in New York:
"Based on the recent legislation in New York, we are prohibited from selling rifles and receivers to residents of New York. We have chosen to extend that prohibition to all governmental agencies associated with or located within New York."
 
Werbung:
Firearms Companies Restricting Sales to Government Agencies in Areas That Restrict Gun Rights
I like it.......but watch Obummer and Co. do something to those firearms companies.
They are already strong arming and threatening state democrat legislators to pass gun control laws, or they will run and support candidates to uproot them from office.

John Lott has the scoop on this in his book, "At the Brink"....
 
Do you think the founding fathers had the mass slaughter of American citizens by American citizens when they talked of the right to bear arms?

Or were they massively out of touch with the modern world and were making rules at a time of threat from the British Empire that have no relevance today?

I bet they are turning in their graves at how the moronic right have abused their intentions
 
Do you think the founding fathers had the mass slaughter of American citizens by American citizens when they talked of the right to bear arms?

Or were they massively out of touch with the modern world and were making rules at a time of threat from the British Empire that have no relevance today?

I bet they are turning in their graves at how the moronic right have abused their intentions

the brits were not the only nation that had the ability to grow tyrants, it can happen any old place so long as the populace is unable to prevent it.

this is the Virginia state flag. ""thus always to tyrants." is the slogan.

nunst076.gif
 
the brits were not the only nation that had the ability to grow tyrants, it can happen any old place so long as the populace is unable to prevent it.

or the populace is too stupid to see it......and majority of those are in lock step with it.
 
touche ! turnabout IS fair play. Yay capitalism !

‘Berettas Don’t Bluff’: Major Gun Company Threatens to Leave Maryland Over New Gun Control Proposals


Update: The Latest Complete List Of Gun Makers & Sellers Saying ‘No!’ To Law Enforcement In Anti-2nd Amendment States

  1. LaRue Tactical
  2. Olympic Arms
  3. Extreme Firepower Inc, LLC
  4. Templar Custom
  5. York Arms 2-13-13
  6. Cheaper Than Dirt
  7. Bullwater Enterprises
  8. West Fork Armory
  9. Smith Enterprise
  10. Alex Arms
  11. Spike’s Tactical
  12. Quality Arms Idaho
  13. Liberty Suppressors
  14. Doublestar Corp (Includes J&T Distributing & Ace LTD)
  15. American Spirit Arms
  16. Trident Armory
  17. Head Down Products
  18. J&G Sales
  19. Barrett Firearms
  20. Exile Machine
  21. Tier One Arms
  22. Bravo Company USA
  23. Primary Weapons Systems
  24. Crusader Weaponry
  25. Top Gun Supply
  26. Kiss Tactical
  27. Clark Fork Tactical
  28. OFA Tactical
  29. One Source Tactical
  30. Templar Tactical Arms
  31. NEMO Arms
  32. Old Grouch’s Military Surplus
  33. Big Horn Armory
  34. Midway USA
  35. CMMG Inc
  36. Rocky Top Tactical
  37. Badger Peak
  38. Controlled Chaos Arms
  39. SRT Arms
  40. Norton Firearms
  41. Umlaut Industries
  42. Predator Intelligence
  43. Citizen Arms
  44. Evolution Weaponry
  45. Chaos Arms
  46. Warbirds Custom Guns
  47. JBTAC
  48. Stoner Arms
  49. Ammoclip
  50. 3 Rivers Precision
  51. 2A Firearms
  52. Lanco Tactical
  53. Predator Tactical
  54. Arrowhead Shooting Sports
  55. Boise Tactical
  56. Huntertown Arms
  57. Lauer Custom Weaponry
  58. 556 Tactical
  59. Iron Goat Guns
  60. Dead Bang Guns
  61. Southern Appalachian Arms
  62. Thunder Beast Arms
  63. Delmarva Shooting Supply
  64. OJ’s Gun Shop
  65. OCS Guns
  66. Semper Fi Arms
  67. Climags
There is little question that Constitutional supporting patriotic states will benefit from the communist left's new freedom restricting policies.

States Try To Lure Gun, Ammo Makers

Top elected officials in Texas and Mississippi want gun and ammunition makers in several states to flee and relocate to their respective states.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Mississippi House Speaker Philip Gunn, both Republicans, have made overtures to Colorado-based Magpul Industries and other manufacturers, suggesting that they relocate.
 
the brits were not the only nation that had the ability to grow tyrants, it can happen any old place so long as the populace is unable to prevent it.

this is the Virginia state flag. ""thus always to tyrants." is the slogan.

nunst076.gif
That is what John Wilkes Booth hollered after he shot Lincoln.
Dummy!
 
Booth was a Democrat racist who believed non-threatening Americans should be disarmed to lessen the threat they posed to radicals and lawbreakers.
Not really. He was driven basically by opposing the abolition of slavery. That movement had many political persuasions.
 
Not really. He was driven basically by opposing the abolition of slavery. That movement had many political persuasions.
Of course the Democrat promotion and preservation of slavery had supporters from all sorts of political persuasions - from crooks, from sexual criminals, from perverts, from atheists, from anarchists, from seditionists, from the irresponsible, from the greedy, from the unemployable, from the demented, and so forth.
 
Booth was a Democrat racist who believed non-threatening Americans should be disarmed to lessen the threat they posed to radicals and lawbreakers.
How do you know what John Wilkes Booth thought about gun control?
There was no gun control in the US by any state or the federal government in 1864.

The Democratic Party today has practically nothing to do with the Democratic Party in 1864. And Booth was a Confederate.
 
How do you know what John Wilkes Booth thought about gun control?
There was no gun control in the US by any state or the federal government in 1864.

The Democratic Party today has practically nothing to do with the Democratic Party in 1864. And Booth was a Confederate.
The Democrat party has always shown a tendency to find themselves at odds with Bible believing Christians in America.
 
The Democrat party has always shown a tendency to find themselves at odds with Bible believing Christians in America.
Yeah
The Democrat party has always shown a tendency to find themselves at odds with Bible believing Christians in America.
What a massive ignorance you have! The Democratic Party ran William Jennings Bryan for president THREE TIMES: in 1896. 1900 and 1908. Bryan was the lawyer for the prosecution (the anti-evolution side) in the Scopes Trial.
 
Yeah

What a massive ignorance you have! The Democratic Party ran William Jennings Bryan for president THREE TIMES: in 1896. 1900 and 1908. Bryan was the lawyer for the prosecution (the anti-evolution side) in the Scopes Trial.
Bryan was defeated by McKinley, a professing Christian with traditional Christian abolitionist views. I don't know if Bryan the Democrat had a long history of abolitionist views or not and I don't know what Osborn thought of the Nebraska Man or the Piltdown Man, both evolutionist hoaxes trotted out during the duration of the Scopes Monkey Trial.

Bryan wrote an excellent article in opposition to the evolution theory hoax:


Professor Osborn is so biased in favor of a brute ancestry . . . that he exultantly accepts as proof the most absurd stories. . . . Each new exhibit, — no matter how largely the product of an inflamed imagination, — lifts him to a new altitude of exultation, and each one in itself furnishes him sufficient foundation for unchangeable convictions. . . . His latest "newly discovered evidence" is a long lost witness captured in Nebraska. He would probably have declared it "irrefutable" even if it had been found in some other state, — all the evidence on his side seems "irrefutable" to him, — but the fact that it was found in Nebraska, my home state for a third of a century, greatly multiplied its value. Some one searching for fossils in a sand hill came upon a lonely tooth. . . . The body of the animal had disappeared, and all the other pieces of "imperishable ivory" had perished; not even a jaw bone survived to supply this Sampson of the scientific world with a weapon to use against the Philistines of to-day. But a tooth in his hand is, in his opinion, an irresistible weapon. The finder of this priceless tooth, conscious that it could impose upon but a few, even among those who prefer speculation to reason, wisely chose Professor Osborn. He hastily summoned a few congenial spirits, nearly as credulous as himself, and they held a postmortem examination on the extinct animal, which had at one time been the proud possessor of this "infinitesimal" and "insignificant" tooth. After due deliberation, they solemnly concluded and announced that the tooth was the long looked-for and eagerly longed-for missing link which the world awaited. The Professor's logic leaks at every link, but it is no worse that that of his boon companions who, having rejected the authority of the word of God, are like frightened men in the dark, feeling around for something they can lean upon. (Bryan, 1925, pp. 104-105.)
 
Werbung:
Of course the Democrat promotion and preservation of slavery had supporters from all sorts of political persuasions - from crooks, from sexual criminals, from perverts, from atheists, from anarchists, from seditionists, from the irresponsible, from the greedy, from the unemployable, from the demented, and so forth.
The Bible promotes slavery also. What do you have to say about your god doing that?
 
Back
Top