While reading Bad Eagles website I found this on the topic at hand:
Obama is being morally attacked by a Southern "white trash" homosexual drug user and former convict, Larry Sinclair. This is unbelievable. I respond only because I know what obssesive accusers are, and how offensive they can be. That Barack Hussein Obama should be subjected to such offends me, even though I am not a fan of his at all. Indeed, this will be the last post I make about him,or homosexuals, for some time. I've had my fill of both.
Larry Sinclair claims that Obama used cocain with him, and committed homosexual acts with him twice, in 1999, when Barack Hussein Obama was an Illinois state senator. There is a web site called Larry Sinclair Obama Drug Scandal, with the entire history of the case, and of Sinclair himself. Larry Sinclair has absolutely no credibility himself, and no proof of anything he is saying. His criminal record, his health and financial records and his family history are known. He has provided them to the public. He is not someone to be believed.
He does, however, have an attorney, and a witness (a limosine driver). Sinclair (originally from South Carolina) has gone public with his accusations of Obama since Semptember, 2007. Sinclair says that
Over the following months until December, 2007 he was contacted several times by Donald Young who appeared to be Obama’s emissary. He was the choir master at the Trinity Church of Christ which was under the direction of Pastor Jeremiah Wright and where Barack Obama is [was] a member of the congregation. Donald Young informed Larry Sinclair that he, too, had a sex and drugs relationship with Barack Obama similar to his.
At first he suggested that Obama was seeking the assistance of Jeremiah Wright in making a statement acknowledging his use of crack cocaine as recently as 1999. But he had second thoughts in early December 2007. Donald Young was murdered in his appartment at Christmas 2007.
Young was 47, single, lived in an appartment with a roommate(?), and was a specialist in elementary education. His death was featured in a homosexual site, and Young was apparently an 'openly' homosexual person.
There are live interviews of Larry Sinclair with Jeff Rense posted on the Sinclair web site, as well as with other radio hosts like Bill Cunningham (with Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily--who takes the story quite seriously). It is an impressive site. The information is stunning and appalling, frankly. And Larry Sinclair has a YouTube posted which is heart-sickening, too disgusting to post here on BadEagle.com. I note these things simply because they exist, and, even on the remote chance that any aspect of the story might be true, or partly true, because it is a devastating story. By the way, Jeff Clark (Huffington Post) also takes the story dead seriously, at least as of June 16, 2008. He writes a blazing, blistering piece on the matter. (However, Clark is utterly erroneous in the idea that the "the burden is on Barack Hussein Obama to prove that he never indulged in cocaine and oral pleasure with Larry Sinclair." Nothing could be more wrong. The burden is on the accuser! Sinclair must provide the proof. Therefore, Clark's 'Huff and Puff" post risks complete failure--except in showing his lack of knowledge of the most basic legal procedure.)
Senator Obama at this point has not responded at all to the allegations. Does he even need to? Probably, he's thinking not to dignify such a "mentally ill" accusation with a response. That is perfectly understandable, but accusation is so ominous and odious that it really can't be ignored, not forever.
I've endured accusation of a similar quality--that of being founded in imagination, without fact, evidence, record, or any such element as would give the accusations even a semblence of reality. I too have ignored them, for some time. But I must say, now, I would advise Obama not to ignore the accusation. Respond, immediately, and with force. The lies compound, and the accusers quote themselves, and thus create a fantasy presence on the internet, and thus the illusion of reality. As I said, I am no fan of Barack Hussein Obama, but I will not stand for any irresponsible accusations of someone, simply because he is a public figure.
Yet, sometimes, a person has to be humble, and, for the sake of the public, say "Yes" or "No"--even to the most irrational accusations. There is no limit to liars, or their lies. Obama should definitely respond. If he does not, ever, nor anyone in his campaign, then we have a serious problem.
If anything Sinclair says is true, if the story is fact, Obama is finished. The Democrat Party is finished as well. For Obama's sake, I hope the story is not true. For the Democrat Party's sake, as is, I hope every word of the story is true.
by David Yeagley on 20 June 2008
