Did Obama really have gay sex and smoked crack in a Limo?

Werbung:
Obama being homosexual is not an issue to me; the drug thing is a bit of an issue to me. The man, who knew him, went to the same church for the same 20 years being murdered a month after coming out with his story IS a LARGE ISSUE TO ME!


Are these cheap false attacks really worth it to you? Anything to try and drag Senator Obama a good Christian Family man down. Scrambling, lying, anything to someway try and make him look as impotent & foolish as John McBush.

You really will stoop so low as to say United States Senator Barack Obama and candidate for President of the United States of America is a homosexual and has drug issues.

Have you seen him with his family. Do you have such hate in your heart that you would really push forward these terrible & obvious lies. The man has a wife and two little daughters he loves more than life itself.

Have you no shame?


Please take a moment and look at who you are attacking with that filth...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE2xajNXcmQ
 
Don't leave out the candidate with the most popular primary votes in US history.

Who would survive longest between the three? Statistics say that McCain's age vs Obama's alleged sexual practices (if true), both men, vs Clinton's age and gender...I'd have to put my money on Hillary.

Good question to ponder actually.;)

Ancient vs high-risk lifestyler (if you only go on his smoking and how skinny he is) vs 60-something woman.

This just an aside, but how many of you think that the McCain/GOP/BigMedia camp has more goods on this subject than their letting out right now and they're just waiting until Obama becomes the official nominee before they flood the press with it?

The evidence to such is that McCain seems almost completely care-free and negligent even of answering Obama's current pot-shots at his campaign. It almost seems like McCain knows something we don't...something he can hang his hat on that will 100% bury his hoped-for democratic opponent.

You know this is just silly. All the most popular vote stuff... is if you don't even count any caucus voters at all and just count states that run primaries leaving all the other voters out. And of course you give all the votes to Clinton in Michigan where 4 of the Democratic candidates weren't even on the ballot. And Florida where Senator Obama kept his word and did not campaign.

Then you go on about what the Republicans will say. What the Republicans said from Rush Limbaugh right on down the line is THEY FULL OUT WANTED TO RUN AGAINST HILLARY CLINTON. I mean come on you know this... Operation Chaos and everything they said the whole primary season was BRING US A CLINTON. The hate for the Clintons energizes their base. They'd love to bring up the whole Monica thing yet again... the blow jobs in the Oval Office, the lying... what a cheating distraction Bill would be yet again. That kind of thing.

Not to mention that Senator Obama won many, many more delegates fair and square which was the bench mark going in. How could anyone want to just steal the nomination away from the obvious rightful winner Senator Obama and seriously think that the minorities in the Democratic Party would just say... OK that's fine we'll still vote for whoever? Do you seriously believe that's a winning strategy in any way?

I like the Clintons. I don't want in anyway to run down the Clintons. The Clintons have done a lot of good things. But you should see that and know that turn about as fair play as well and support our nominee. The primary is over. If we are Democrats then we support out nominee. I'd have certainly done as much if Hillary had won the nomination even though I truly, honestly see her past family baggage as a very possible fatal flaw.

We need to move on to focusing all of our efforts on stopping a Bush third term and completely destroying our whole country! Please...
 
Actually I agree. I think the only issue worth considering is if Obama is fit physically to run the country.
 
Actually I agree. I think the only issue worth considering is if Obama is fit physically to run the country.
How about the question of whether or not he would rule the country according the the spirit and letter of the Constitution? 'Cause the last time I checked the Constitution was not a socialist document.
 
Um folks, I meant the only issue pertinent from this thread! :rolleyes:

Duh!

OK, let me clarify: the only issue worth discussing from this thread as to Obama, is not if he is a closet bisexual, or purely homosexual (married his wife as many gay politicians do in order to further their political careers) but how his health may be affected if these allegations prove true.

It is relevent if he's actively smoking crack. My local greasy diner requires it's dish dogs and bus boys to pass regular urine drug screening; you'd think that would also be a requirement for the Oval Office, but alas, no..

It is HIGHLY relevent if Obama has HIV from his alleged activities (since being a promiscuous drug-using homosexual would put him at the apex of suspects to carry HIV or even have full-blown AIDS). Being in the throes of AIDS, even with today's medicines to keep it in check, stress is the number one morbid predictor for survival of AIDS. Guess what the presidency will be this time around?...yep...stressfull...very stressfull.

Of course issues like the economy, the BigOil corporate monopoly that's forced us into bankruptcy to gain its hostile takeover of sovereign Iraq's oil, the foreclosure crises, etc. etc. etc. Naturally these issues are most important. But in order to solve them it follows that one must be alive to do so.
 
How about the question of whether or not he would rule the country according the the spirit and letter of the Constitution? 'Cause the last time I checked the Constitution was not a socialist document.

Senator Obama was a Constitutional Law Professor. I would say he's well versed on the subject.
 
Um folks, I meant the only issue pertinent from this thread! :rolleyes:

Duh!

OK, let me clarify: the only issue worth discussing from this thread as to Obama, is not if he is a closet bisexual, or purely homosexual (married his wife as many gay politicians do in order to further their political careers) but how his health may be affected if these allegations prove true.

It is relevent if he's actively smoking crack. My local greasy diner requires it's dish dogs and bus boys to pass regular urine drug screening; you'd think that would also be a requirement for the Oval Office, but alas, no..

It is HIGHLY relevent if Obama has HIV from his alleged activities (since being a promiscuous drug-using homosexual would put him at the apex of suspects to carry HIV or even have full-blown AIDS). Being in the throes of AIDS, even with today's medicines to keep it in check, stress is the number one morbid predictor for survival of AIDS. Guess what the presidency will be this time around?...yep...stressfull...very stressfull.

I just don't see what you think you gain by lying this way. As Karma goes... you're in very bad shape... you have to know that.

You're definitely more than willing to try your utmost to smear and character assassinate without grounds this good Husband & Father. A United States Senator who's only crime is that he wants to be our next President and try to help Americans out of the mess George Bush & the Republicans put us into.

You call him a Homo a HIV carrier and a drug addict without even a scintilla of truth... just because you my friend are a very sore loser. Your favorite lost so now you take your ball and go home cussing out the winner.

I hope no one ever treats you so unfairly... I really do. Because this is a truly good man.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qTD7geUCyM
 
Hey top gun. If you'll note early on in this thread I was disgusted that anyone would bring it up at all. And then just recently I took a peek to see what the hubbub was about. I watched the you-tube video just to give information a chance and to gauge the sincerity of the claimant. To be honest, the guy looked straight at the camera with the most sincere of faces and there was no weird blinking or shiftiness as when people lie in his body language.

He says he's going to submit to a polygraph test.

Even still, the guy could be making this all up. Note in my post above I made sure to say that "if" this was true "alleged" etc.

Now you are claiming that I'm the one who brought up this subject and am responsible for its content. Sorry, that's not how things unfolded here on this thread.

I'm just saying that the guy does look guant, much like a couple people I've known who have slid downhill with AIDS, that given that and also this youtube guy's claims...that Obama is ALLEGEDLY a promiscuous drug-using homosexual, we have something to be concerned about as to his fitness for president.

And what's even more important, that stalwart Obama-addicts should consider, if this stuff does have merit, not saying it does but IF it does...don't kid yourself for one minute that the GOP, once they have the Obama trap in the bag at the Denver convention, will hesitate for a nanosecond to run it through their mouthpieces at BigMedia.

And when that happens, presuming this stuff has teeth, what position do you think the democrats will be in as far as winning the Whitehouse this Fall?

Mmmmmm hmmmm.. Strategy, democrats. Once in a while it doesn't hurt to do your own background check on your politically-correct and flawless icons. Say what you want about Hillary, the skeletons in her closet are all boiled and picked clean. The one's in Obamas are starting to smell a little...
 
Senator Obama was a Constitutional Law Professor. I would say he's well versed on the subject.


Apparently not since he would like to do a lot of things in this country that are directly opposed to the intent of our founding fathers who wrote the constitution.

Tax the rich to give to the poor
windfall profits tax on big oil
nationalizing the oil industry
federal involvement in education
etc.

btw,:

"Alongside my own deep personal faith, I am a follower, as well, of our civic religion," he says. "I am a big believer in the separation of church and state. I am a big believer in our constitutional structure. I mean, I'm a law professor at the University of Chicago teaching constitutional law. [Actually, Obama is not a law professor, but a "senior lecturer." As Chicago Sun-Times columnist Lynn Sweet has pointed out, and I know from six-and-a-half years as a college adjunct lecturer, "In academia, there is a vast difference between the two titles." As Sweet also notes, however, Obama's misrepresentation of his academic position is the least of his credibility problems.]
 
Um folks, I meant the only issue pertinent from this thread! :rolleyes:

Duh!

OK, let me clarify: the only issue worth discussing from this thread as to Obama, is not if he is a closet bisexual, or purely homosexual (married his wife as many gay politicians do in order to further their political careers) but how his health may be affected if these allegations prove true.

It is relevent if he's actively smoking crack. My local greasy diner requires it's dish dogs and bus boys to pass regular urine drug screening; you'd think that would also be a requirement for the Oval Office, but alas, no..

It is HIGHLY relevent if Obama has HIV from his alleged activities (since being a promiscuous drug-using homosexual would put him at the apex of suspects to carry HIV or even have full-blown AIDS). Being in the throes of AIDS, even with today's medicines to keep it in check, stress is the number one morbid predictor for survival of AIDS. Guess what the presidency will be this time around?...yep...stressfull...very stressfull.

Of course issues like the economy, the BigOil corporate monopoly that's forced us into bankruptcy to gain its hostile takeover of sovereign Iraq's oil, the foreclosure crises, etc. etc. etc. Naturally these issues are most important. But in order to solve them it follows that one must be alive to do so.

What if He has Sars?

Or Ebola?

Maybe he has Polio......
 
Werbung:
Um folks, I meant the only issue pertinent from this thread! :rolleyes:

Duh!

OK, let me clarify: the only issue worth discussing from this thread as to Obama, is not if he is a closet bisexual, or purely homosexual (married his wife as many gay politicians do in order to further their political careers) but how his health may be affected if these allegations prove true.

It is relevent if he's actively smoking crack. My local greasy diner requires it's dish dogs and bus boys to pass regular urine drug screening; you'd think that would also be a requirement for the Oval Office, but alas, no..

It is HIGHLY relevent if Obama has HIV from his alleged activities (since being a promiscuous drug-using homosexual would put him at the apex of suspects to carry HIV or even have full-blown AIDS). Being in the throes of AIDS, even with today's medicines to keep it in check, stress is the number one morbid predictor for survival of AIDS. Guess what the presidency will be this time around?...yep...stressfull...very stressfull.

Of course issues like the economy, the BigOil corporate monopoly that's forced us into bankruptcy to gain its hostile takeover of sovereign Iraq's oil, the foreclosure crises, etc. etc. etc. Naturally these issues are most important. But in order to solve them it follows that one must be alive to do so.

Well half of congress probably smokes crack and has prostitutes, so that doesnt bother me.

The murder of the church member who came out on his relationship with Obama is more important I think
 
Back
Top