Don't Waste Your Vote!

strongservice

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
45
Location
Seattle, Wash.
Don’t Waste Your Vote! Let's do it right this time in November and not vote for hype. Let's vote for who can actually do the job here at home. If you still can't choose by the time the election is here, and you need to just take a shot in the dark because both parties suck. -
FOR GOD'S SAKE DON'T VOTE! - That would truly be a Waste of your vote.
 
Werbung:
I'm not wasting my vote.
California is going to vote for Obama, regardless of what I do.
So, I'm going to vote for the best candidate, regardless of who is likely to win.

I'm not voting for either of the two major parties, not for the tweedledumacrat, nor for the twedledeebucan,. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

I know it's a protest vote. So be it.
 
I'm not wasting my vote.
California is going to vote for Obama, regardless of what I do.
So, I'm going to vote for the best candidate, regardless of who is likely to win.

I'm not voting for either of the two major parties, not for the tweedledumacrat, nor for the twedledeebucan,. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

I know it's a protest vote. So be it.

well alright. as long as its what you feel is right.
 
I'm in Calif. too and I know all 172 electoral votes will go to Obama. But I'm still voting, and voting for Romney.

But mine is just as much as a protest vote as PLC's - neither one of our votes are going to count at the end of the day.
 
I'm in Calif. too and I know all 172 electoral votes will go to Obama. But I'm still voting, and voting for Romney.

But mine is just as much as a protest vote as PLC's - neither one of our votes are going to count at the end of the day.

may well be right but you never know...
 
I'm in Calif. too and I know all 172 electoral votes will go to Obama. But I'm still voting, and voting for Romney.

But mine is just as much as a protest vote as PLC's - neither one of our votes are going to count at the end of the day.

You mean 55 electoral votes. If CA had 172, BO would win in a landslide.

What does it say about CA that they would reelect BO? The state is in decline all due to out of control liberalism and yet, they would reelect a liberal (really a socialist). Its crazy.
 
You mean 55 electoral votes. If CA had 172, BO would win in a landslide.

What does it say about CA that they would reelect BO? The state is in decline all due to out of control liberalism and yet, they would reelect a liberal (really a socialist). Its crazy.
What does it say about California? It says that it really is the land of fruits and nuts :)
 
Werbung:
You mean 55 electoral votes. If CA had 172, BO would win in a landslide.

What does it say about CA that they would reelect BO? The state is in decline all due to out of control liberalism and yet, they would reelect a liberal (really a socialist). Its crazy.

Right, 55 for CA. I must have been thinking about delegate votes. But that's stll almost 1/3 of what he would need to win. The most current numbers I found were for 2008. It said for registered voters - 43% were Dems., 33% Repubs. and the rest must be (24%) Ind.of some sort. Obummer won with 60% of the vote in '08.

The idiot state has decided to build a multi billion dollar rail system (that no one will use) even though we are billions of dollars in the red. Nothing that makes any sense ever comes out of Sacramento. All our big businesses keep moving out of the state and they want to increase our taxes even more. I don't know who they think will be left who can pay them. Calif. has one third of the nation's welfare recipients.
 
Back
Top