G.O.P. needs "Teabaggers" to cleanse it of liberalism!

always

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2009
Messages
1,143
YES!! The TEABAGGERS need NOT form a third party, they just need to VOTE as a BLOCK within the G.O.P., take it over, control it , throw out the radical leftist that hide out there and SAVE America .
Forming a third party will weaken us, probably allowing Obama and his enemies of America to keep control of our Congress.
Teabaggers are after all, just concerned Americans fed up with radical liberalism controling both our Politicial parties.
Throw out the trash in our Congress in 2010 and then in 2012 we get the head BAG along with any other remaining libs!!
 
Werbung:
YES!! The TEABAGGERS need NOT form a third party, they just need to VOTE as a BLOCK within the G.O.P., take it over, control it , throw out the radical leftist that hide out there and SAVE America .
Forming a third party will weaken us, probably allowing Obama and his enemies of America to keep control of our Congress.
Teabaggers are after all, just concerned Americans fed up with radical liberalism controling both our Politicial parties.
Throw out the trash in our Congress in 2010 and then in 2012 we get the head BAG along with any other remaining libs!!

Without claiming all Teabaggers are racist, it is undeniable that some are attracted to these rallies.
teaparty_robertson_spelling_racist_problem.jpg



Here's a whole page of them http://images.google.com/images?q=r...ent=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi



Does it bother you to have these racists drawn to the Teabag movement, or are they welcome?
 
Without claiming all Teabaggers are racist, it is undeniable that some are attracted to these rallies.

rev-wright-22.jpg


Rev. Wright, Obama's pastor for 20 years, married Barack and Michelle, baptised their children, gave a speech that was the inspiration for the Audacity of Hope book, claims HIV was created by whites to kill blacks, he's a 9/11 troofer - and he's a racist.

The racist New Black Panther Party endorsed Obama, they were caught engaging in voter intimidation against whites during the election and Obama saw to it the charges were dismissed.

So devil, there are plenty of racists to go around, you can find them on both sides. You cannot legislate away racism, bigotry and personal prejudices, so it will always be with us. Unless you want to eliminate freedom of speech, you should accept that they have the right to be idiots.
 
Rev. Wright, Obama's pastor for 20 years, married Barack and Michelle, baptised their children, gave a speech that was the inspiration for the Audacity of Hope book, claims HIV was created by whites to kill blacks, he's a 9/11 troofer - and he's a racist.

The racist New Black Panther Party endorsed Obama, they were caught engaging in voter intimidation against whites during the election and Obama saw to it the charges were dismissed.

So devil, there are plenty of racists to go around, you can find them on both sides. You cannot legislate away racism, bigotry and personal prejudices, so it will always be with us. Unless you want to eliminate freedom of speech, you should accept that they have the right to be idiots.

How many racist placards can you find photos of at left wing rallies? To deny that the teabag movement attracts many racists (not all of them, but many) is to ask us to not believe our eyes.
 
How many racist placards can you find photos of at left wing rallies? To deny that the teabag movement attracts many racists (not all of them, but many) is to ask us to not believe our eyes.



Why do you need placards as proof of racism? Is not the recorded word good enough for you, or are you just looking for a way to deny left wing racism?

Look at Farrakhan, and the crowds he draws. I bet you would deny he is a racist too.
 
Why do you need placards as proof of racism? Is not the recorded word good enough for you, or are you just looking for a way to deny left wing racism?

Look at Farrakhan, and the crowds he draws. I bet you would deny he is a racist too.

The legal concept of Best Evidence is what requires photos & I would deny the Rev. Wright is a racist in the normal sense of the word.

"The best evidence rule is a common law rule of evidence which can be traced back at least as far as the 18th century. In Omychund v Barker (1745) 1 Atk, 21, 49; 26 ER 15, 33, Lord Harwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was "the best that the nature of the case will allow". The general rule is that secondary evidence, such as a copy or facsimile, will be not admissible if an original document exists, and is not unavailable due to destruction or other circumstances indicating unavailability."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_evidence_rule
 
Why do you need placards as proof of racism? Is not the recorded word good enough for you, or are you just looking for a way to deny left wing racism?

Look at Farrakhan, and the crowds he draws. I bet you would deny he is a racist too.

Political Bigotry has that effect on people.
 
rev-wright-22.jpg


Rev. Wright, Obama's pastor for 20 years, married Barack and Michelle, baptised their children, gave a speech that was the inspiration for the Audacity of Hope book, claims HIV was created by whites to kill blacks, he's a 9/11 troofer - and he's a racist.

The racist New Black Panther Party endorsed Obama, they were caught engaging in voter intimidation against whites during the election and Obama saw to it the charges were dismissed.

So devil, there are plenty of racists to go around, you can find them on both sides. You cannot legislate away racism, bigotry and personal prejudices, so it will always be with us. Unless you want to eliminate freedom of speech, you should accept that they have the right to be idiots.

American knew this before BO got the Dem nomination, yet he now sits in the WH.

How far we have fallen to elect a man like this to the highest office.

But, we have elected many worthless presidents and some who were socialists. However we now have an anti-American Marxist president.
 
The legal concept of Best Evidence is what requires photos & I would deny the Rev. Wright is a racist in the normal sense of the word.

"The best evidence rule is a common law rule of evidence which can be traced back at least as far as the 18th century. In Omychund v Barker (1745) 1 Atk, 21, 49; 26 ER 15, 33, Lord Harwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was "the best that the nature of the case will allow". The general rule is that secondary evidence, such as a copy or facsimile, will be not admissible if an original document exists, and is not unavailable due to destruction or other circumstances indicating unavailability."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_evidence_rule

So, a video tape of the words of Wright, and Farrakhan, are not good enough for you, yet a photograph is? According to your reference that secondary evidence is not good enough if the original document exists.

Are you in possession of the placard, or know anyone who is?
 
Werbung:
If your argument is that the Teabagger movement does not have a sizable racist undercurrent..... but that the Obama administration does, here's a web site arguing that the earth is actually flat for you. http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm
I have little interest in debating patently, observably absurd arguments.
Have fun in Oz.



And I tire of pointing out the absolute idiocy of posts like yours.

If you want to use your standard of evidence, then produce the original documentation to support your argument.

As for the Tea Party, I have seen no reasonable evidence that it is racist, just a bunch of BS arguments because the media does not show a large number of Blacks in the rallies. I already posted articles, doubt if you read any, by several Black groups who support the Tea Party.

If you want to remain ignorant, then please do so.
 
Back
Top