Guess what's hidden in the "stimulus" bill: Most of Hillarycare!

Little-Acorn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
2,444
Location
San Diego, CA
You might remember Hillarycare: A huge plan, prepared by Hillary and Bill Clinton during secret meetings between politicians, lawmakers, insurance companies... everybody EXCEPT doctors. A plan to nationalize the U.S. Health Care industry, it described a new Federal bureaucracy whose job was to decide who got what health care, which doctors you could see, what treatments you could and couldn't have, and what restrictions and penalties you would face if you didn't do health care the way the bureaucracy wanted you to.

Bill and Hillary published the entire plan in a book in 1993, describing their plans, what new crimes and jail sentence awaited patients or physicians who tried to "get around the system", pay cash for their treatment, etc.

Many people credit Hillarycare as the single biggest reason Democrats were thrown out of every majority in Congress (and most state governorships) the following year.

Well, now it's back. It's not called Hillarycare, of course. It merely recycles a large number of the things she tried to get done. Fellow leftist Tom Daschle is identified as the author this time.

Not long ago, Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel said that a crisis like the current housing meltdown, was an opportunity to do things that the Democrats couldn't get done by other means. It's now becoming clear what he had in mind. Under the guise of "stimulating the economy", Hillary's old Univeral Health Care plan is being snuck into the gigantic "stimulus" bill.

Obama and many Congressional Democrats are insisting that there be little examination or debate of the bill, saying that we don't have the time to "bicker over details", and that the country desperately needs this stimulus bill NOW.

It's said that emergency conditions make for bad law.

The Democrats seem bent on raising that standard to a new height.

------------------------------------------

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_mccaughey&sid=aLzfDxfbwhzs

Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan

Commentary by Betsy McCaughey

Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Republican Senators are questioning whether President Barack Obama’s stimulus bill contains the right mix of tax breaks and cash infusions to jump-start the economy.

Tragically, no one from either party is objecting to the health provisions slipped in without discussion. These provisions reflect the handiwork of Tom Daschle, until recently the nominee to head the Health and Human Services Department.

Senators should read these provisions and vote against them because they are dangerous to your health. (Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH, pdf version).

The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.

But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.”

Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but enforcing uniformity goes too far.

New Penalties

Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time” (511, 518, 540-541)

What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional. In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the “tough” decisions elected politicians won’t make.

The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal, Daschle’s book explained, is to slow the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

Elderly Hardest Hit

Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.

Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost- effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council (464).

The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.

In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that elderly patients with macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind in one eye before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye. It took almost three years of public protests before the board reversed its decision.

Hidden Provisions

If the Obama administration’s economic stimulus bill passes the Senate in its current form, seniors in the U.S. will face similar rationing. Defenders of the system say that individuals benefit in younger years and sacrifice later.

The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical and nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined (90-92, 174-177, 181).

Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration’s health-care overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount an opposition. “If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it,” he said. “The issue is too important to be stalled by Senate protocol.”

More Scrutiny Needed

On Friday, President Obama called it “inexcusable and irresponsible” for senators to delay passing the stimulus bill. In truth, this bill needs more scrutiny.

The health-care industry is the largest employer in the U.S. It produces almost 17 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product. Yet the bill treats health care the way European governments do: as a cost problem instead of a growth industry. Imagine limiting growth and innovation in the electronics or auto industry during this downturn. This stimulus is dangerous to your health and the economy.
 
Werbung:
When the Democrats tried to enact these things in the 1990s, opponents started running TV commercials showing a couple of actors playing a husband and wife, reading from the book the Clintons had published to describe it. They would point out what the book said, and ask if they really wanted that as part of U.S. law.

People started calling their Congressmen in droves, telling them not to vote for it. Despite the Democrats having majorities in both houses and a Democrat president, they couldn't get the package through Congress, as Dem and Repub congressmen alike said they couldn't vote for it.

Public pressure told the Democrats in no uncertain terms, that they DIDN'T WANT SOCIALIZED HEALTH CARE.

Sounds like Democrats didn't get the message, though. Now they are trying the same thing again, putting ponderous, government-controlled health care into a bill again. But this time they are trying to sneak it in: Taking a bill that putatively has nothing to do with Health Care, and putting the same provisions in, that the American people had soundly rejected in 1993. And they are trying to rush it through with little exposure and no discussion, saying we don't have the time, we have to pass this whole thing NOW. For the good of the country, of course.

Democrats have been trying to legislate against the will of the American people for many years now.

Sounds like that's one thing that wasn't intended to be CHANGEd. They're still doing it... and Barack Obama (the "candidate of CHANGE") is going right along with it.
 
Werbung:
This is typical. The dems put crap in here and just hope no one notices since they are so wrapped up with the "gloom and doom" message.
 
Back
Top