EUROPEAN WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL JUSTICE FOR CLINTON, BUSH AND KARADZIC
Serbia’s Karadzic illegally shot innocent Serbian Muslims in the Serbian defensive civil war; America’s Clinton and Bush illegally bombed innocent Iraqi Muslims in the offensive pre-emptive international Iraq Wars, in support of the Judeofascist Israeli Land Robbers. If Karadzic had bombed, instead of shot the Muslims, how would his war crimes have been different from those of Clinton and Bush? Is Clinton’s whereabouts unknown to the European Union War Crimes Tribunal; and are they waiting until Bush is no longer president, before charging him? Or are American leaders exempt, by special dispensation.
Or are the war crimes of passion, committed by patriotic leaders desperately fighting to prevent the partitioning of their nation, greater that the international war crimes of pre-meditated political and economic gains? What legal precedent shall the European War Crimes Tribunal set for themselves, for the time when they too are desperately confronted by their own terrorist Muslim separatists, and must finally resort to violent ethnic cleansing? And, shall they set a precedent that will greatly encourage Muslim minorities everywhere to start their own promising separatist movements?
Karadzic is a great Serbian nationalist, who certainly would have saved his beloved Serbia from partitioning by her Muslim separatists, had ugly American Neo-Con/Neo-Lib military intervention not occurred. Who other than Serbia should have the legal right to try and sentence Karadzic for his war crimes against her own innocent Serbian citizens? But, in the cases of Clinton and Bush, who committed international war crimes against innocent Iraqi citizens; who other than the United Nations of World should have the right to try and sentence them, given that America has failed to uphold its own Constitutional Rule of Law?
Serbia’s Karadzic illegally shot innocent Serbian Muslims in the Serbian defensive civil war; America’s Clinton and Bush illegally bombed innocent Iraqi Muslims in the offensive pre-emptive international Iraq Wars, in support of the Judeofascist Israeli Land Robbers. If Karadzic had bombed, instead of shot the Muslims, how would his war crimes have been different from those of Clinton and Bush? Is Clinton’s whereabouts unknown to the European Union War Crimes Tribunal; and are they waiting until Bush is no longer president, before charging him? Or are American leaders exempt, by special dispensation.
Or are the war crimes of passion, committed by patriotic leaders desperately fighting to prevent the partitioning of their nation, greater that the international war crimes of pre-meditated political and economic gains? What legal precedent shall the European War Crimes Tribunal set for themselves, for the time when they too are desperately confronted by their own terrorist Muslim separatists, and must finally resort to violent ethnic cleansing? And, shall they set a precedent that will greatly encourage Muslim minorities everywhere to start their own promising separatist movements?
Karadzic is a great Serbian nationalist, who certainly would have saved his beloved Serbia from partitioning by her Muslim separatists, had ugly American Neo-Con/Neo-Lib military intervention not occurred. Who other than Serbia should have the legal right to try and sentence Karadzic for his war crimes against her own innocent Serbian citizens? But, in the cases of Clinton and Bush, who committed international war crimes against innocent Iraqi citizens; who other than the United Nations of World should have the right to try and sentence them, given that America has failed to uphold its own Constitutional Rule of Law?
