Obama as a "Socialist"

[Agnapostate]

I'm not going to repeat exactly what I just said in a prior post. If you weren't willing to read that, you're going to believe whatever nonsense you want to regardless of what I say.

 

[Pandora]

I'm not going to repeat exactly what I just said in a prior post. If you weren't willing to read that, you're going to believe whatever nonsense you want to regardless of what I say.

go back to the actual thread and re-reply to my question about a
7 year old girl and 60 year old man.

Perhaps you thought you explained it better?

some confusion could be

my name was no obamanation then and its pandora now

if that helps?

 

[Dante the Marxist]

I always enjoy watching good threads degenerate into total mayhem. I have found that every large one ends up like that.

 

[GenSeneca]

classical liberalism and capitalism are incompatible

No matter how long your posts, no matter how many times you copy and paste them, it doesn't cover up the reality that your assertions are factually inaccurate.

The phrase classical liberalism is used in standard academic sources to mean early liberalism, often with particular emphasis on the liberalism of Jacksonian democracy in the 19th Century, which stressed laissez-faire economics and Originalism.

Capitalism and Classical Liberalism are both Individualist ideologies, Socialism is a Collectivist ideology

Capitalism and Classical Liberalism are both based on Individual rights, Socialism is based on Collective Rights.

Capitalism and Classical Liberalism recognize rights as natural, negative rights, that exist independent of government, Socialism recognizes rights as social, positive rights, granted by government or society.

Capitalism and Classical Liberalism both support free markets with no government intrusion, Socialism supports government intrusion on the markets.

Capitalism and Classical Liberalism both support property rights, Socialism supports the abolition of property rights.

There simply are no conflicts between Capitalism and Classical Liberalism, while Socialism isn't compatible with either of them.

 

[Agnapostate]

No matter how long your posts, no matter how many times you copy and paste them, it doesn't cover up the reality that your assertions are factually inaccurate.

I agree, which is why I didn't bother to respond to your regurgitated talking points. I'll simply take your lack of response to my actual extensive commentary as a concession.