1. Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Obama issues last-minute plea to call off Jan.26 eligibility hearing in GA court

Discussion in 'U.S. Politics' started by Little-Acorn, Jan 26, 2012.

  1. dogtowner

    dogtowner Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    17,848
    Likes Received:
    1,464
    Location:
    Wandering around

    no expert qualification as opposed no doubt. just being accurate as the decision states.

    they did not prove their case. ok fair enough. but they did have their opportunity which is what matters.

    do not gild the lily.
     
  2. Openmind

    Openmind Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    4,111
    Likes Received:
    119
    Location:
    Currently Belgium
    And you think that if there was any doubt, the judge would not have asked to hear some "Expert" witnesses?
    And you think that if expert witness had been willing to provide testimonies in favor of the plaintiffs, they would not have been called by the plaintiffs, instead of those jokers?

    What looks like a rose, and smells like a rose. . .;):)
     
  3. Pandora

    Pandora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,790
    Likes Received:
    257
    Location:
    The people's republic of Eugene


    Those people should have had the info submitted by experts, so it’s their own damn fault they lost. The truth about this and all the other questionable from the obama administration won’t come out till after he is out of office.
     
  4. Openmind

    Openmind Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    4,111
    Likes Received:
    119
    Location:
    Currently Belgium

    And it did! Isn't it nice when the judicial system actually works to curb stupidity!
     
  5. Openmind

    Openmind Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    4,111
    Likes Received:
    119
    Location:
    Currently Belgium

    Problem(for the bithers) was that NO true expert would put their integrity in line for such a joke!


    Or maybe you think that YOU are an expert since you are so convinced (based on what?) that Obama is not a natural born citizen?
     
  6. dogtowner

    dogtowner Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    17,848
    Likes Received:
    1,464
    Location:
    Wandering around
    I think a judge weighs the evidence presented, reviews any applicable precedents and rules on the merits. Caveat being that he did not have to rule on the merits on this one since the defense stayed home but that plaintifs requested merits instead of a procedural win. You can debate the quality of the defens' case or decision to pass on the procedural win in favor of an actual ruling on merits but its water over the dam at this point.
     
  7. Openmind

    Openmind Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    4,111
    Likes Received:
    119
    Location:
    Currently Belgium
    We all know that a "procedural win" to keep the President of the United States from exercising his birth right would have NEVER held in court. . .even with the SCOTUS so biased to the Right.

    So, although "on paper" the plaintiffs might have had the chance. . .it is obvious that it was not going to happen.

    And, yes, it is water under the dam at this point. But I'm sure that another more ridiculous attempt will be done again. . . with the same results!
     
  8. dogtowner

    dogtowner Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    17,848
    Likes Received:
    1,464
    Location:
    Wandering around
    well appeals are certainly a possibility no matter what
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice