Obama Plans To Abandon Hard-Won White, Working-Class Voters

Texas_tea

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
5,003
Location
Great State of TEXAS
2683-New-Deal-white-working-class.jpg


The New York Times reported on Sunday that the Obama campaign is adopting a radically new political strategy to win the presidency again in 2012, but it requires that his party abandon this traditional bloc in favor of new and more dynamic constituencies. As a campaign strategy in 2012, this makes perfect sense.

First the working class whites and now the Catholics as well. Dictator Obama, who will unite the people strikes once again .
 
Werbung:
Now What if George Bush said that while he was president? You think the mainstream liberal media would ignore it? No! They would go wild like a bunch of monkeys in a cage. But when liberals do it they say oh well,,,
 
Now What if George Bush said that while he was president? You think the mainstream liberal media would ignore it? No! They would go wild like a bunch of monkeys in a cage. But when liberals do it they say oh well,,,
Whatever it takes to destroy the US Constitution and bring America down is OK with the MSM. It is only efforts to strengthen the US and the Constitution that are opposed!
 
What a bunch of BS!

Enjoy your collective delusions. . .:rolleyes:

From "the Hill"
Another Gallup poll released on Thursday showed that a growing number of Americans are satisfied with the direction of the country. While a strong majority remains dissatisfied, those who approve are up to 22 percent, doubling-up the 11 percent low from early spring.

When Obama took office in January of 2009, only 13 percent were satisfied with the direction of the country.
 
What a bunch of BS!

Enjoy your collective delusions. . .:rolleyes:
This is a story from the NY Times ... a favorite liberal rag. Maybe you should read the story before calling BS! And, I do not follow polls, they have proven to be inaccurate every time. I follow only election results. Considering the results of the 2010 mid-term election, the polls are where the true BS lies.
 
This is a story from the NY Times ... a favorite liberal rag. Maybe you should read the story before calling BS! And, I do not follow polls, they have proven to be inaccurate every time. I follow only election results. Considering the results of the 2010 mid-term election, the polls are where the true BS lies.

Yes, astory from 3 monts ago,at a time when Obama's approval rating was near an old time low. How nice of you to remind us of how much his populariy has rebound in just 3 month!
 
Yes, astory from 3 monts ago,at a time when Obama's approval rating was near an old time low. How nice of you to remind us of how much his populariy has rebound in just 3 month!
Obama has the lowest approval rating of any sitting President in US history. I will agree that is no new news. But, I posted this story in comparison to Obama abandoning the Catholic vote as well, which is a current story. You must have missed that part. It is just another clear example of Obama ruling against the will of the people and against the Constitution.

Now, you can criticize me for pointing out the obvious about Obama but, it doesn't change the facts. It is what it is.
 
Yes, astory from 3 monts ago,at a time when Obama's approval rating was near an old time low. How nice of you to remind us of how much his populariy has rebound in just 3 month!

The Presidency isn't a popularity contest. The United States of America can do much better than this. Obama is just another gutter politician, nothing more.
 
The Presidency isn't a popularity contest. The United States of America can do much better than this. Obama is just another gutter politician, nothing more.

I think BO is much more than that...and its all bad. He is a hardcore Marxist ideologue. If he were just another gutter politician he would be in it for the money and power. I think he is in it to fundamentally change America into a socialist shit hole like the rest of the worlds socialist nations.
 
Obama has the lowest approval rating of any sitting President in US history. I will agree that is no new news. But, I posted this story in comparison to Obama abandoning the Catholic vote as well, which is a current story. You must have missed that part. It is just another clear example of Obama ruling against the will of the people and against the Constitution.

Now, you can criticize me for pointing out the obvious about Obama but, it doesn't change the facts. It is what it is.

No, Obama doesn't have the lowest approval rating of any sitting President! In fact, Bush senior's approval rating fell to 29% at one point!

Why do you guys think you ALWAYS need to exagerate in an effort to spin propaganda. . .This takes away from your credibility (at least for people who can read statistics and do some research. . .obviously the brainless sheep will believe whatever reinforces their already eroneous beliefs!)

Anyway. . .don't mind me. . .I'm just here to question your statements and provide some factual rebuttal to the misleading (and sometime direct lies) statements.

Here is some FACTUAL information from Gallup:
Low points in presidencies:
Johnson: 38% 10/6/67
Ford: 37% 1/10/75
Carter: 32% 11/2/79
Reagan: 35% 1/28/83
Bush Senior: 29% 7/31/92
Clinton: 37% 6/5/93
Obama:
 
Sorry, I wasn't able to complete the above statistics within the 15 minutes "editing period" allowed. . .so here is the end:

Low points in presidencies:
Johnson: 38% 10/6/67
Ford: 37% 1/10/75
Carter: 32% 11/2/79
Reagan: 35% 1/28/83
Bush Senior: 29% 7/31/92
Clinton: 37% 6/5/93
Obama: 40% 8/15/2011

And if you look at the AVERAGE approval rating over the first term of many presidents, (although it is a little early for Obama's average to include the whole of his full term) we see that Obama's average approval rating between Jan 20, 2009 and Feb. 2012 is 49%. . .a LOT better than many other presidents.

But if you want to see for yourself, just go to Gallup. They have a very eay to use "comparison" between many Presidents.
 
How could he lose the middle class if he never had it?

Oh, through their own ignorance of how bad his policies effect them... that's how he got them I guess.
 
Sorry, I wasn't able to complete the above statistics within the 15 minutes "editing period" allowed. . .so here is the end:

Low points in presidencies:
Johnson: 38% 10/6/67
Ford: 37% 1/10/75
Carter: 32% 11/2/79
Reagan: 35% 1/28/83
Bush Senior: 29% 7/31/92
Clinton: 37% 6/5/93
Obama: 40% 8/15/2011

And if you look at the AVERAGE approval rating over the first term of many presidents, (although it is a little early for Obama's average to include the whole of his full term) we see that Obama's average approval rating between Jan 20, 2009 and Feb. 2012 is 49%. . .a LOT better than many other presidents.

But if you want to see for yourself, just go to Gallup. They have a very eay to use "comparison" between many Presidents.
I find it interesting that all of the above numbers are higher than the current approval rating of Congress.
 
I find it interesting that all of the above numbers are higher than the current approval rating of Congress.

Your statement is meaningless. Do not buy into the silliness of the media.

Comparing the president's rating with Congress' is comparing apples and oranges. You must compare the Pres to ONE Congressman or Senator. If you do this, you will find that most individual congress members have higher ratings than the Skinny Marxist.
 
Werbung:
I find it interesting that all of the above numbers are higher than the current approval rating of Congress.

Yes. There is no hiding the fact that what is really broken is the Congress, and that over 85% of Americans realize this!
And by the way, the approval rating of the Congress has NOT gone up (actually it has gone down) since the "landslide victory of the tea party in 11/2010).

Funny though that, when REAL, FACTUAL numbers are presented to contradict the "assured statements of Obama's failures" suddenly the comments dwindle down to NOTHING!

What say you, Texas?
 
Back
Top