SusanConstant
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 131
I'm being filed again in US Supreme Court. As the court violated Marbury in my case constitutional authority was thrown to local district family court which upheld my certification as an absolute class of one. I went from plaintiff or petitioner upon constitutional authority and original jurisdiction to defendant and nothing in the case changed save for new federal injuries. Legally the court's refusal to accord me oral argument but hearing by reading only then made all Americans subject to proof of death. Proof of death is a court asking innocent people to die to then prove the injury is reality. Basically the court denied reality by denying me oral argument as if Bush V Gore harmed no one and as if discrimination of women and the ethical is not reality. That violates art. 4 sec. 4 and is the exact charge I made. No court 'accidentally' commits an act of the EXACT charge you named. In fact, every single one of my charges was then committed by US Supreme Court including the nasty lawyer trick of fudging words to make it seem as if. My first suit?
I named all of you, placed you all under "third parties" and said if I had to I'd invoke prior federal precedent known as Lexington and Concord , The Revolution and The Civil Rights Movement as well as a Supreme Court ruling stating that if the law does not exist or is not being lived out as real then the citizen who breaks it cannot be convicted but instead the law and/or the refusal of the citizens to live it out (obey it) must then be addressed and so, would start shooting if neccessary. Thus you were all told to die and come back with your dead body as proof that the denial of justice which is Bush V Gore, Carhart, Schiavo and In Re Susan among others harmed you.
All offices of government have been unchecked. All that was left was denying me oral argument and so violating Marbury.
Opposing counsel entered the exact suit I filed in Supreme Court to family court. This then opened the door for me to file again in US Supreme Court. I did so and then had it returned for a missing staple. Good thing too - opposing counsel? When they found out that I actually placed John Roberts on my witness list for family court they panicked then played a game with local cops who then called out a US Marshal, lol! The Marshal thought opposing counsel represented the federal court and did not know he was the third parties lawyer. He was stunned to see the box and the letter from US Supreme Court. I was on the floor putting the missing staple within my suit. He tried to do his duty but he violated my civil rights as he kept asking me what it would take to get me to give up my rights. I told him he could not ask a member of the injured class that nor ask any citizen that especially one who is pro se, authority and o.j. as it constitues a crime but he asked over again. So I then amended my suit to include this injury as if John Roberts exactly was not Chief then this never would have happened. It also would not have happened if the Supreme Court was willing to do its duty by women.
At one point the Marshal laughed. He asked my WHY I named Roberts. I said, "Who is Chief Justice? It is not Fred Smith. It's John Roberts. You check and balance the office not the person as our law is no conditions only terms. If you volunteered to act as Chief after Bush V Gore I'd be naming you. As it is I named him as a citizen, as a Chief and as the whole court."
Anyway, it will be filed or os I was told. Supreme Court led me to believe it will be filed under the name you know me by. If Supreme Court wishes to keep violating the law Roberts might be appearing as my witness in family court as secrecy applies there too. I do not think any other citizen ever had the idea to do this or couldn't as nobody else is pro se, authority and o.j. . It's like I told the US Marshal: How else do you serve a Chief with notice to appear except in a direct lawsuit? I asked Roberts within the suit:
What in the world do you actually believe as I cannot tell from your actions and your decisions as you keep changing the conditions when there aren't supposed to be any and you keep refusing to hear cases that will prove what you state are your true beliefs. You may not pick and choose a true belief as that then is picking and choosing faith aka law as a true belief is actual reality. The law is; it is not matter of your personal, unsupported belief which may or may not be actual reality. This is why ignorance is not an excuse in the eyes of the law and this is why faith is not to be blind. This court has heard atheists; why not hear a case proving the Creator and making actual legal power a reality for women? There is only one actual reason to avoid hearing such a case: to preserve, protect and defend three men named Bush, Cheny and Roberts. As all three have now violated the separation of powers and/or made or amended law in a manner not legal then that is an excuse and not a reason. Once unchecked the offices remain unchecked unless a citizen rises and acts to re-check them. Like it or not first one to the bar checks the offices and that person is me as no other citizen knew Bush V Gore for what it is: bad math and not our law as it then served to overthrow our government once innocent citizens were forced to die in defense of the institution of government instead of the constitution of government. I have sons not daughters so the overthtrow is now complete. Innocent males have now been "ordered" to die w/o reason or just cause as you named no reason as you could not. If you can use silence to lie then you can pick up a pen and write the truth: "We are not willing to accord Citizen X any protection of the law thus not accord any woman or any American justice."
If I'm filed you'll know it and if I'm heard again you'll know it. If I get the place I claimed upon the docket to give oral argument the newspapers will let you know (pro se authority cases do not ask; they demand or order). I not once considered I'd have to tell the federal court what I did...In Re Susan should have been enough. I forgot one fact: Enlightenment?
It not only happened to me in the world's only, actual universal vehicle as taxi is the only universal word on Earth but upon a road named Penman.
I named all of you, placed you all under "third parties" and said if I had to I'd invoke prior federal precedent known as Lexington and Concord , The Revolution and The Civil Rights Movement as well as a Supreme Court ruling stating that if the law does not exist or is not being lived out as real then the citizen who breaks it cannot be convicted but instead the law and/or the refusal of the citizens to live it out (obey it) must then be addressed and so, would start shooting if neccessary. Thus you were all told to die and come back with your dead body as proof that the denial of justice which is Bush V Gore, Carhart, Schiavo and In Re Susan among others harmed you.
All offices of government have been unchecked. All that was left was denying me oral argument and so violating Marbury.
Opposing counsel entered the exact suit I filed in Supreme Court to family court. This then opened the door for me to file again in US Supreme Court. I did so and then had it returned for a missing staple. Good thing too - opposing counsel? When they found out that I actually placed John Roberts on my witness list for family court they panicked then played a game with local cops who then called out a US Marshal, lol! The Marshal thought opposing counsel represented the federal court and did not know he was the third parties lawyer. He was stunned to see the box and the letter from US Supreme Court. I was on the floor putting the missing staple within my suit. He tried to do his duty but he violated my civil rights as he kept asking me what it would take to get me to give up my rights. I told him he could not ask a member of the injured class that nor ask any citizen that especially one who is pro se, authority and o.j. as it constitues a crime but he asked over again. So I then amended my suit to include this injury as if John Roberts exactly was not Chief then this never would have happened. It also would not have happened if the Supreme Court was willing to do its duty by women.
At one point the Marshal laughed. He asked my WHY I named Roberts. I said, "Who is Chief Justice? It is not Fred Smith. It's John Roberts. You check and balance the office not the person as our law is no conditions only terms. If you volunteered to act as Chief after Bush V Gore I'd be naming you. As it is I named him as a citizen, as a Chief and as the whole court."
Anyway, it will be filed or os I was told. Supreme Court led me to believe it will be filed under the name you know me by. If Supreme Court wishes to keep violating the law Roberts might be appearing as my witness in family court as secrecy applies there too. I do not think any other citizen ever had the idea to do this or couldn't as nobody else is pro se, authority and o.j. . It's like I told the US Marshal: How else do you serve a Chief with notice to appear except in a direct lawsuit? I asked Roberts within the suit:
What in the world do you actually believe as I cannot tell from your actions and your decisions as you keep changing the conditions when there aren't supposed to be any and you keep refusing to hear cases that will prove what you state are your true beliefs. You may not pick and choose a true belief as that then is picking and choosing faith aka law as a true belief is actual reality. The law is; it is not matter of your personal, unsupported belief which may or may not be actual reality. This is why ignorance is not an excuse in the eyes of the law and this is why faith is not to be blind. This court has heard atheists; why not hear a case proving the Creator and making actual legal power a reality for women? There is only one actual reason to avoid hearing such a case: to preserve, protect and defend three men named Bush, Cheny and Roberts. As all three have now violated the separation of powers and/or made or amended law in a manner not legal then that is an excuse and not a reason. Once unchecked the offices remain unchecked unless a citizen rises and acts to re-check them. Like it or not first one to the bar checks the offices and that person is me as no other citizen knew Bush V Gore for what it is: bad math and not our law as it then served to overthrow our government once innocent citizens were forced to die in defense of the institution of government instead of the constitution of government. I have sons not daughters so the overthtrow is now complete. Innocent males have now been "ordered" to die w/o reason or just cause as you named no reason as you could not. If you can use silence to lie then you can pick up a pen and write the truth: "We are not willing to accord Citizen X any protection of the law thus not accord any woman or any American justice."
If I'm filed you'll know it and if I'm heard again you'll know it. If I get the place I claimed upon the docket to give oral argument the newspapers will let you know (pro se authority cases do not ask; they demand or order). I not once considered I'd have to tell the federal court what I did...In Re Susan should have been enough. I forgot one fact: Enlightenment?
It not only happened to me in the world's only, actual universal vehicle as taxi is the only universal word on Earth but upon a road named Penman.