Sanders Says His Revolution Is Just Getting Started

He's barely a socialist and certainly not a communist. Don't you know the difference?
I have a feeling you're about to bore us with a lecture on the subject. In the real world Communists despise working folk and desire dictatorship.
 
Werbung:
I have a feeling you're about to bore us with a lecture on the subject. In the real world Communists despise working folk and desire dictatorship.
Okay so you don't know the difference and to you it's all the same thing, ... sorta like a Cessna is no different from a 747 because they both fly. Got it.
 
As there are no governments that are textbook socialist or communist and really no people either, these debates are pointless.
There are a sort of spectrum of socialist or communist thinking that one can fall into.
For that matter there are no pure libertarians. Liberals or conservatives only ranges on the spectrum.
 
As there are no governments that are textbook socialist or communist and really no people either, these debates are pointless.
There are a sort of spectrum of socialist or communist thinking that one can fall into.
For that matter there are no pure libertarians. Liberals or conservatives only ranges on the spectrum.
And that is a good part of my point. Apparently Hammerhead doesn't know this or he just throws out generalizations to get a reaction, but he'll no doubt thank you for answering for him.
 
And that is a good part of my point. Apparently Hammerhead doesn't know this or he just throws out generalizations to get a reaction, but he'll no doubt thank you for answering for him.
No I think hh does get it. Because textbook definitions are moot in reality you are left with generalities.
Not ALL libertarians are single issue voters (legalize pot) but in (I think)2008 libertarian prep debate pot consummed virtually the entire 90 minutes. And there were like half a dozen candidates.
 
Wow it looks like you are deeply in love with that crusty old Communist. lol

http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/

Communism = tyranny and mass murder.

Communism won't bring equality, only dictatorship and prison camps.
And BTW, the NYPost is a right wing rag and relies on false information and outright lies. It's unmitigated nonsense to declare Bernie is a hard core communist. Their "evidence" consists of no documentation and only their own "interpretation" of the role of a few organizations. Young People’s Socialist League? The Socialist Party? The United Packinghouse Workers Union? They were communist orgs? Really? Some have called the Democratic Party a communist party. Shall we just take it as fact because it feels good? We are seeing the results of people feeling good about Trump as he destroys the Republican Party.

The NYPost article is garbage.

And the USSR as an example of communism? It's easy to bury your head in the sand when you hear something to feels pleasing to the ears. But a study into it reveals that the claim that Russia and China are "communist" is merely "the Big Lie". It plays well with the people who know no better, so they keep pushing it. But both were cases of capitalist roaders turning the countries into state capitalism, complete with repressions. But I'm sure this is too much of a lecture and it's so much easier to just be satisfied with sketchy distortions that sound good to the willing ear.
 
And BTW, the NYPost is a right wing rag and relies on false information and outright lies. It's unmitigated nonsense to declare Bernie is a hard core communist.
You dismiss all facts that fail to prop up your ideology.

And the USSR as an example of communism?
Of course you ignore actual Communist countries and focus on what your ideology tells you Communist countries should look like. So far Communist countries have been impoverished dictatorships, but I'm sure next time you'll create a true paradise. Lol
 
So you think it's true that Bernie is a communist and there's no difference between communism and socialism?
No but he plays one on tv.
By the book (which is meaningless) socialism is just a stop along the way. So as a world view not much different.
But in actual practice they're both just smoke and mirrors in front of dictatorial power.
 
You dismiss all facts that fail to prop up your ideology.
On the contrary. Read it again. I specifically referred to biased generalities the article relied on to make its claim. It seems that your charge is actually applicable to you.

Of course you ignore actual Communist countries and focus on what your ideology tells you Communist countries should look like. So far Communist countries have been impoverished dictatorships, but I'm sure next time you'll create a true paradise. Lol
But you still haven't named one. Your unsubstantiated words and general puffery doesn't count as evidence of anything.
 
No but he plays one on tv.
Huh? He plays a communist on TV???

By the book (which is meaningless) socialism is just a stop along the way. So as a world view not much different.
But in actual practice they're both just smoke and mirrors in front of dictatorial power.
You're so wrong. There has been a refinement and a parting of the ways between communism and socialism. And dictatorship? Take a look at this short clip and tell me how much of a dictatorship it reflects:

Then tell me which of the following are dictatorships: Norway, Iceland, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Denmark.
 
Werbung:
Tell which of them does government own the means of production ?
1) government owning the means of production is state capitalism.

2) Are you saying that none of those countries are socialist? Are none of the governments of those countries socialist? If your answer to either of those is "yes" then you need to show how they are what you said: dictatorships. Or you could admit you erred.
 
Back
Top