1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Should Nancy Pelosi or Porter Goss be Tortured to Save the Constitution?

Discussion in 'U.S. Politics' started by JimDuensing, May 11, 2009.

  1. JimDuensing

    JimDuensing New Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    From: http://www.jimduensing.com/should-n...oss-be-tortured-to-save-the-constitution.html


    The controversy this weekend over what Nancy Pelosi knew and just when she knew it is heating up.

    Documents from the cia indicate that as early as September 4th, 2002, both Porter Goss and Nancy Pelosi were jointly briefed by the cia about the torture techniques which had been employed during the “interrogation” of a suspected member of Al Qaeda.


    Here is a pdf of the an unclassified memo about a series of such briefings.

    The public debate over the Establishment Media channels has centererd merely on whether Pelosi was told that a technique of drowning someone during “enhanced interrogation”, termed waterboarding, was 1) going to be used or 2) already had been used.

    Pelosi's current recollection of the events of that briefing were stated by spokesman Brendan Daly who said "The speaker was briefed only once, in September 2002. The briefers described these techniques, said they were legal, but said that waterboarding had not yet been used."

    For argument's sake, let's take Pelosi at her word – or rather her spokesperson's word. She's been rather tight lipped on the subject lately. But, let's give her the benefit of the doubt and assume she only knew that the Bush / Cheney administration was claiming the legal right to drown people in a secret detention center in Communist Cuba - but that they hadn't done it - yet.

    If just that much of her story is true, Pelosi had a moral and legal obligation, as the ranking Democratic member of the so-called “House Intelligence Committee”, to defend the American Constitution against domestic enemies of freedom who were – and still are – willing to trample the freedoms that brave Americans have fought and died to secure.

    Torture is not an American value.

    Freedom and a respect for human rights – even and especially the rights of those held and awaiting trial – are fundamental American values. It's what makes us better than the evil ones.

    Now, let's analyze the question the Establishment Media is kicking around, namely was Pelosi briefed that torture by drowning had already been used.

    Here's what the LA Times had to say:

    A chart compiled by the CIA indicates that Pelosi (D-San Francisco) was briefed on Sept. 4, 2002, on the agency's interrogation of alleged Al Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah, and that the session covered "the particular [enhanced interrogation techniques] that had been employed." The chart does not list the specific methods covered during the briefing. But during the preceding month, the CIA had used the simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding on Abu Zubaydah at least 83 times, according to a Justice Department memo released last month.

    83 times prior to the briefing? And, they never mentioned it to the congressional heads of the House Intelligence Committee?

    It's interesting to note that the other person briefed simultaneously with Pelosi was Porter Goss her Republican counterpart, then Chair of the House Intelligence Committee.

    Prior to that meeting, when already serving on the House Intelligence Committee, Goss was infamous for having met with the so-called bagman of 9/11 on the very morning of the terrorist attacks.

    Later, Goss was appointed to head the cia.

    Pelosi's claim of ignorance doesn't pass the smell test as Chris Matthews would say.

    The two ranking members of the House Intelligence Committee are briefed about torture techniques. One of the two soon becomes the head of the agency they were overseeing that was providing the briefing – and they don't tell them torture had already been used?

    I don't buy it.

    Goss claims the so-called gang of four, which included himself, Pelosi, Bob Graham and Richard Shelby, were briefed and all gave bi-partisan support to the cia's systematic torture of detainees.

    Something in my gut tells me that's accurate.

    But, luckily, we don't need to rely on my or even Stephen Colbert's gut on this one. We don't even need to rely on the word of Pelosi or Goss.

    Pelosi already now admits to knowing that your government claimed the right to secretly torture people with suspected ties to the evil ones. Her silence; her failure to sound the alarm and warn the American people about this threat to American liberty automatically disqualifies her from any position of leadership in the people's house.

    So, here's what I propose:


    The Civilized Option

    A. Pelosi keeps her seat, but resigns her leadership position.

    B. Pelosi immediately calls for American sanctioned torture to cease.

    C. Pelosi immediately calls for an open investigation into the cias destruction of evidence regarding its systematic practice of torture.

    OR

    The Torture Option

    Both Pelosi and Goss be strapped to a gurney and drowned until their stories officially match about what was said at the briefing just prior to the one year anniversary of 9/11.

    I sincerely hope most Americans are opposed to the Torture Option. In truth, I am. However, it is precisely what Pelosi and Goss favor with regard to other enemies of the Constitution.

    But then again, maybe I'm just suffering from a pre-9/11 mindset.

    Perhaps Dick Cheney is right, it could save hundreds of thousands of lives.

    With Goss' links to funding terrorism and Pelosi's aid and comfort to the enemies of American freedom, perhaps waterboarding them both is the only appropriate solution in a post 9/11 world.

    And, if it's only “enhanced interrogation”, they have nothing to fear.
     
  2. Andy

    Andy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,497
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    No she shouldn't. None of them should. What should happen is, the left needs to shut up about it all being on Bush. The entire leadership of congress, democrats, republicans, liberals, conservatives, and everyone in between, all knew, all accepted that this was a needed and neccesary action.

    The answer is no. Nothing needs to be done. What needs to be done, is for political partisan idiots need to shut up about it. There was nothing illegal about it, nothing wrong with it, and no action is required for it. Grow up. Get a life. Move on.
     
  3. Mr. Shaman

    Mr. Shaman New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So, now.....this is going to do what, to hold Bush/Cheney accountable for initiating war-crimes?

    Even the suggestion that Pelosi would go to Bush/Cheney, and "file a complaint"...only to hear:"So?"....is laughable. The Oligarchs were running the asylum.

    :rolleyes:
     
  4. Mr. Shaman

    Mr. Shaman New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nope.

    Dick de Sade is still wrong, alright.

    :rolleyes:
     
  5. Mr. Shaman

    Mr. Shaman New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Soooooooooooooo.....after "conservatives" (continally) insisted that Bill Clinton was responsible for everything that happened under his Watch...it's now "different", for The Idiot Son??

    Sorry.

    Stupidity still isn't a valid-excuse.

    :rolleyes:
    :
     
  6. Mr. Shaman

    Mr. Shaman New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....so that's what he's doing....a Victory Dance!!!


    :rolleyes:

    :cool:
     
  7. Mr. Shaman

    Mr. Shaman New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Looks like you're wrooooooooooooooooooooooong, AGAIN.....SKIPPY!!!

    :p

     
  8. Little-Acorn

    Little-Acorn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,444
    Likes Received:
    151
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    One post, one reply, followed by five consecutive posts of ShamMan fluff. :rolleyes:

    No wonder nothing much gets done in this forum.
     
  9. Andy

    Andy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,497
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Your response, and my post, are not in any way related. Nor did I say Bush wasn't responsible for something that happened under his watch. If there is an "idiots son", it's likely a House of Politics poster that I always end up replying too.
     
  10. Andy

    Andy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,497
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    From the actual article the idiots son cited...


    Difficult to determine, doesn't mean it didn't happen. Of course that's a logical conclusion....
     
  11. Pandora

    Pandora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,790
    Likes Received:
    257
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The people's republic of Eugene
    If you guys would put him on ignore you would not see his posts and sooner or later he would stop
     
  12. Carlo Rossi

    Carlo Rossi New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm sure Barack Obama could have gotten the same information from the terrorists by giving them an iPod and some Blockbuster DVDs.
     
  13. Mr. Shaman

    Mr. Shaman New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Uhhhhhhhhhh......that was "...difficult to determine conclusively...", Skippy....you know, like Guilty; beyond a reasonable-doubt.

    Ya' ever hear of that phrase, Skippy?

    :rolleyes:
     
Loading...

Share This Page