Your continual demand for sources is merely an acknowledgement of your own ignorance
For example, if I said WW2 started in 1939 would you be demanding sources or does a rudimentary grasp of history suffice?
In this example all you need to know is the average annual murder rate in the US (say 27,000) and the number of victims of 9/11 (roughly 3,000).
A simple piece of arithmetic can then be applied (1 x 3000 here 1 = the number of attacks on the towers and 11.5 x 27,000 where 11.5 = the number of years since 9/11)
The exact numbers are irrelevant to the overall point
The fact that you need sources to be able to evaluate this is utterly bizarre
And I'd love to hear why my question is absurd
It makes clear sense to me
What, I suspect, is meant is that Gone doesn't like the inevitable consequence of having to face the reality that Americans are much more dangerous to Americans than any Muslims
Despite your governments efforts to demonise them to justify killing them in wars.