Socialism: Our tax dollars at work!

It was the regulations requiring subprime loans that brought all this on.
It was the regulation of Mark-To-Market, a knee-jerk response to Enron, that caused the stock market to crash.

In short, maybe you should explain whatever happened to "regulations and the federal reserve will fix it all!" claim you socialists have been pushing all this time.

Could you liberals possibly have been WRONG all this time?

Andy, you're a real ONE TRICK PONY you know that?

Over all this time of your ridiculous saber rattling about how things were really good under Bush and the Republicans and McCain would win and doom and gloom and smears against a really good man (now) President-elect Obama, the simple undeniable fact is this...

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SENT A MANDATE AND KICKED YOU HARD , HAAAAARD, TO THE CURB!:)

Now we get to hear all this whining that Republican Deregulation didn't hurt anything... blah, blah, blah. The economy would be stupendous and we'd be in an economic utopia if only a couple of those Democrats hadn't spoke in good terms about Fannie & Freddie along with the vast, VAST majority of REPUBLICANS!!!

And as far as your latest smear campaign... everything is Socialism I point to this...

Your good buddy and best friend the Republican Compassionate Conservative George Bush is still in charge. He's signing and promoting this "Socialism" so you must never want another Republican in office ever!:)

And to go to it from my perspective if the difference has to be a Nazi like Republican regime based on consolidation of power in the Executive Branch and Wars of invasion & occupation all predetermined & set up based on lies and cherry picked intel to make the preferred case and the total destruction of our domestic economy...

OR

The Socialism of Americans taking care of Americans with Social Security, Medicare and Veterans benefits and trying to stimulate our economy and prevent further colasps...

COMRADE SIGN ME UP I'M SOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Werbung:
Andy, you're a real ONE TRICK PONY you know that?


Truth is the best trick. It might get tiring to hear the truth repeatedly, but then that's what truth is. A tiring reminder of what really is.

Over all this time of your ridiculous saber rattling about how things were really good under Bush and the Republicans and McCain would win and doom and gloom and smears against a really good man (now) President-elect Obama, the simple undeniable fact is this...

Please list all the times I said things were so good under Bush?

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SENT A MANDATE AND KICKED YOU HARD , HAAAAARD, TO THE CURB!:)


An example of the "mandate".

Now we get to hear all this whining that Republican Deregulation didn't hurt anything... blah, blah, blah. The economy would be stupendous and we'd be in an economic utopia if only a couple of those Democrats hadn't spoke in good terms about Fannie & Freddie along with the vast, VAST majority of REPUBLICANS!!!

I do not need to prove a negative. You are the one making the claim. You either prove your claim or be laughed for the idiocy of your posts.

Your good buddy and best friend the Republican Compassionate Conservative George Bush is still in charge. He's signing and promoting this "Socialism" so you must never want another Republican in office ever!:)

Yes, and I'm against Bush for this. That still doesn't excuse Obama for supporting and wanting to expand it. Remember, he's the one that claimed it was having a positive effect. Where is this positive effect? Show me Top Gun, where is the great and wonderful positive effect that Obama is talking about?

And to go to it from my perspective if the difference has to be a Nazi like Republican regime based on consolidation of power in the Executive Branch and Wars of invasion & occupation all predetermined & set up based on lies and cherry picked intel to make the preferred case and the total destruction of our domestic economy...

OR

The Socialism of Americans taking care of Americans with Social Security, Medicare and Veterans benefits and trying to stimulate our economy and prevent further colasps...

COMRADE SIGN ME UP I'M SOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Amazing... here we have enacted socialist policies, and they have failed to do anything, and we have a long history of socialism failing, and you even voted in an idiot that claims there were positive effects that no one anywhere can find, yet you want more.

No unity with these idiots. We need to rally against the Obamabots.
 
Andy;80227]Truth is the best trick. It might get tiring to hear the truth repeatedly, but then that's what truth is. A tiring reminder of what really is.

There's your problem... you think TRUTH can be a TRICK. It cannot. Truth is the Truth.

Please list all the times I said things were so good under Bush?

You've said good things about Bush and the Republicans overall many times especially in comparisons to any Democrat. Everyone knows that. I'm not saying he's your favorite Republican but you've supported him.

As far as your Howard Stern example that there were cases of Blacks voting for Obama because he was Black in any select group you could find some of this.

You could easily go to some Far Right Christian Conservative group and attribute positions supported by Obama (not abortion but general policy things) to McCain or Palin and see them support those statements as well.

There is always some band-wagoning. But for a perfectly good example I'm a 51 year old White guy in Ohio earning up to between 60-70K per year and I think you'd agree I'm pretty supportive of President-elect Obama an fully aware of his positions on pretty much everything. So there were a lot of very informed people involved and supportive as well.

In the end it's the Electoral votes and the numbers. President-elect Obama has a HUGE mandate.


I do not need to prove a negative. You are the one making the claim. You either prove your claim or be laughed for the idiocy of your posts.

Again you want me to pull up things that are common knowledge. The vast majority (almost all) Republicans supported Fannie & Freddie. I'm not wasting my time posting what everybody already knows.

Yes, and I'm against Bush for this. That still doesn't excuse Obama for supporting and wanting to expand it. Remember, he's the one that claimed it was having a positive effect. Where is this positive effect? Show me Top Gun, where is the great and wonderful positive effect that Obama is talking about?

So you know more than EVERYBODY! EITHER SIDE!:D Come on Andy...

The fact is President-elect Obama won't even be in office for 20 more days. Wait until he gets there before you have a nervous breakdown.;)


Amazing... here we have enacted socialist policies, and they have failed to do anything, and we have a long history of socialism failing, and you even voted in an idiot that claims there were positive effects that no one anywhere can find, yet you want more.

No unity with these idiots. We need to rally against the Obamabots.

DUDE! We've been ruled by or held hostage by Neo-con Nazis for the last 8 years and you're crying about making a change. You become a laughing stock when everyone sees you wanting to stifle change when at the same time EVERYONE also sees that we are desperately in need of change.

I think you're so scared that things will improve under President Obama you can't see straight.
 
There's your problem... you think TRUTH can be a TRICK. It cannot. Truth is the Truth.

Then why don't you speak something truthful once?

You've said good things about Bush and the Republicans overall many times especially in comparisons to any Democrat. Everyone knows that. I'm not saying he's your favorite Republican but you've supported him.

I have supported him. That's a fair leap from saying everything was peachy and perfect.

As far as your Howard Stern example that there were cases of Blacks voting for Obama because he was Black in any select group you could find some of this. [/QUOTE]

I've met a bunch of people exactly like that. Color doesn't matter.

You could easily go to some Far Right Christian Conservative group and attribute positions supported by Obama (not abortion but general policy things) to McCain or Palin and see them support those statements as well.

Perhaps. But you can't claim that everyone voted because they understood the issues and policy differences, when clearly they don't.

There is always some band-wagoning. But for a perfectly good example I'm a 51 year old White guy in Ohio earning up to between 60-70K per year and I think you'd agree I'm pretty supportive of President-elect Obama an fully aware of his positions on pretty much everything. So there were a lot of very informed people involved and supportive as well.

If there is any verb that fits you, "informed" isn't one of them. The fact you support Obama fits perfectly with the Stern video.

In the end it's the Electoral votes and the numbers. President-elect Obama has a HUGE mandate.

There wasn't an opposition vote. McCain is practically a democrat. Your Keating Five comment proves that.

Again you want me to pull up things that are common knowledge. The vast majority (almost all) Republicans supported Fannie & Freddie. I'm not wasting my time posting what everybody already knows.


Yes, I can see your point.... :rolleyes:

So you know more than EVERYBODY! EITHER SIDE!:D Come on Andy...

The fact is President-elect Obama won't even be in office for 20 more days. Wait until he gets there before you have a nervous breakdown.;)

Apparently I do. The fact this is the best, most informed argument you can make, proves I clearly know more than you.

DUDE! We've been ruled by or held hostage by Neo-con Nazis for the last 8 years and you're crying about making a change. You become a laughing stock when everyone sees you wanting to stifle change when at the same time EVERYONE also sees that we are desperately in need of change.

I think you're so scared that things will improve under President Obama you can't see straight.

Nice thing about this is, if he does do something good, I win then too. If he does anything wrong, it's all on you.

If he's successful, great. If he's not, I blame you. Either way, it's a win-win for me.
 
It was the regulations requiring subprime loans that brought all this on.
Ya' heard-about-that, did ya'?? :rolleyes:

December 18, 2007

"It's very disappointing," said Michael Shea, executive director of ACORN Housing, a national group that provides homeownership counseling for low-income consumers. "Wall Street has made billion$ and now they're hardly paying anything at all" for their role in the sub-prime crisis.

Bush, who once touted his administration's goal as creating an "ownership society," may now go down in history as the president on whose watch ownership declined. The nation's homeownership rate has fallen during the last two years and will plummet further next year. Moreover, Bush's unwillingness to take bold steps to regulate lenders, brokers, and investors will guarantee that the next president will inherit a much bigger mortgage mess."
 

I'll check out the article later, because it makes tons of claims, but not much evidence is given.

As to these statements...
"It's very disappointing," said Michael Shea, executive director of ACORN Housing, a national group that provides homeownership counseling for low-income consumers. "Wall Street has made billion$ and now they're hardly paying anything at all" for their role in the sub-prime crisis.

Wall Street didn't make billions or the stock market wouldn't be crashing. Further, anything coming from ACORN, one of the most corrupt groups operating in the US today, is a joke. Further, no one conservative wanted that bailout. I sure didn't. I didn't see any conservative here in favor of it.

Bush, who once touted his administration's goal as creating an "ownership society," may now go down in history as the president on whose watch ownership declined. The nation's homeownership rate has fallen during the last two years and will plummet further next year. Moreover, Bush's unwillingness to take bold steps to regulate lenders, brokers, and investors will guarantee that the next president will inherit a much bigger mortgage mess."

That's fine that you don't like Bush. But realize you can't have it both ways. You can't stop sub-prime lending, which automatically means people will not be able to get loans, and at the same time have more people getting loans for homes.

Obviously the mandate to increase home ownership, lowered the requirements for getting homes. Those people defaulted and had their homes forclosed on. Further, naturally since the source of bad loans is closed, few are going to be getting homes.

You can't complain about home ownership here, and then complain about sub-prime loans there. That doesn't work.
 
I'll check out the article later, because it makes tons of claims, but not much evidence is given.
Kinda like lookin'-in-a-mirror, huh? :rolleyes:

Wall Street didn't make billions or the stock market wouldn't be crashing.
Yeah, and....the 1%ers really didn't get tax-cuts, or there'd have been tens-of-miilions of new-jobs created, right? :rolleyes:
 
Andy;80239]Then why don't you speak something truthful once?

Come on Andy don't be bitter.

I have supported him. That's a fair leap from saying everything was peachy and perfect.

And that's exactly what I said. You're the one that was trying to distance yourself.

I've said all along Bush was a wrecking ball and now we all have to clean up his mess.


Perhaps. But you can't claim that everyone voted because they understood the issues and policy differences, when clearly they don't.

WHAT! We're in agreement?::eek: Because it's always like that in every election. Some people vote on just one single issue or on personality.

Perfect example: The KKK always endorses the Republican. In this cycle one branch at the beginning even had a direct fund raising link on their website going to Ron Paul.


If there is any verb that fits you, "informed" isn't one of them. The fact you support Obama fits perfectly with the Stern video.

Sorry you feel that way because I'm really extremely informed. Have to understand both sides to make a case for either.

But I know what you mean. I feel the same way about Beck or Savage or Limbag. So it's really that we're just adamantly opposed to one another's postion... and not a matter of being informed.


There wasn't an opposition vote. McCain is practically a democrat. Your Keating Five comment proves that.

Andy you're going to have to face it. There was opposition. You yourself talked about the GREAT "Palin effect". The problem was you couldn't (and won't) get the moderates and the Independents.

It's like the Republican that said... If the Republican Brand was dog food it would be so damaged they'd pull it off the shelves!:)


Nice thing about this is, if he does do something good, I win then too. If he does anything wrong, it's all on you.

If he's successful, great. If he's not, I blame you. Either way, it's a win-win for me.

Sounds a lot to me like a little kid screaming... I'll either throw a temper tantrum or I'll blame you!:D

Hang in there Andy... it will be alright!;)
 
Kinda like lookin'-in-a-mirror, huh? :rolleyes:

You are not a mirror. The article is exactly what I have found typical with you. Much in accusations. Little to nothing in evidence or substance.

Yeah, and....the 1%ers really didn't get tax-cuts, or there'd have been tens-of-miilions of new-jobs created, right? :rolleyes:

Of course they did. Everyone got a tax cut. I'm ok with that. Every dollar not sent to government, is one less dollar wasted.

Yes, there were millions of jobs created. Anyone honest knows that.
 
Come on Andy don't be bitter.

Not bitter at all. You rarely if ever speak the truth.

And that's exactly what I said. You're the one that was trying to distance yourself.

I've said all along Bush was a wrecking ball and now we all have to clean up his mess.

Straw-man. I'm not trying to distance myself at all. I am explaining the view that I have always had, and still have. Bush was not nearly as bad as you claim. He did some very good things. Cutting taxes, and fighting the war, for example. At the same time, he wasn't what I would have wanted either. He allowed too much democrat spending, passed a socialist bailout, and didn't act to revoke the democrat push for sub-prime loans, or to force the democrats to regulate their cash cows Fannie and Freddie.

I'm not like you. I don't play partisan politics. Nor am I an "all or nothing" idiot, that can't see the good for the bad, or the reverse. In short, I think. I don't just play the "he screwed up everything" or the "he's perfect" cards. I didn't when Clinton was in office either. He passed some good things as well.

WHAT! We're in agreement?::eek: Because it's always like that in every election. Some people vote on just one single issue or on personality.

Perfect example: The KKK always endorses the Republican. In this cycle one branch at the beginning even had a direct fund raising link on their website going to Ron Paul.

For the left, it sure seems like most vote that way. At work a lady there railed and railed about Amnesty, than talk about how the democrats were going to fix that.


I won't have to worry about putting gas in my car, I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage.

This is what I run into constantly. People who believe that Obama is going to pay for everyone's gas. Obama is going to make everything free. Obama is going to stop illegal immigration. Obama is going to solve all everything.

I have even met people who voted for Obama specifically because they believed he was the messiah. There's another video on youtube, where they exit poll people and ask them various questions about policy and people. Most couldn't even name who Obama's VP was. Other's didn't know where he stood on most issues.

The left is the most ignorant group of people I've ever met.

Sorry you feel that way because I'm really extremely informed. Have to understand both sides to make a case for either.

But I know what you mean. I feel the same way about Beck or Savage or Limbag. So it's really that we're just adamantly opposed to one another's postion... and not a matter of being informed.

Sorry, but you have yet to show me you are informed on any issue. You still claim Bush lied, when the Rockefeller report proved conclusively he did not. You still believe socialized health care will work, when clearly it never has in history. You still claim the problem with GM is that they are making the wrong type of cars, when they are selling millions a year, but simply are not making money on them. You still claim deregulation caused the sub-prime melt down, despite it being regulation itself that pushed sub-prime loans.

I'd be hard pressed to locate even one issue you are actually informed on. You posts typically have zero facts, many claims, no support, and are full of partisan bias. At least with Shaman, I have to look something up, and prove the source wrong (which I always do). With you, there is nothing to even look up.

Andy you're going to have to face it. There was opposition. You yourself talked about the GREAT "Palin effect". The problem was you couldn't (and won't) get the moderates and the Independents.

It's like the Republican that said... If the Republican Brand was dog food it would be so damaged they'd pull it off the shelves!:)

No, the problem was we lost the political right to Ron Paul. Palin was the only thing the made the ticket interesting. Look, McCain was about as moderate as one gets. There's no denying that. Just go look who he voted with most of the time. Look at his Senate voting record. He even supported the Bailout, when conservatives were going nutz against it.

Getting the moderate vote wasn't the problem. That's the only vote he had. The only conservatives that voted for McCain, were one's that thought Obama would be worse.

Sounds a lot to me like a little kid screaming... I'll either throw a temper tantrum or I'll blame you!:D


That's exactly how I view the left. Even after the election, most of the new threads on this forum were "WAHHHHHH BUSH! WAHHHHH MCCAIN!". Nothing changes with you people. When there's nothing to complain about, you'll complain that there should be.

Hang in there Andy... it will be alright!;)

Yes. I am still banking that the conservatives will continuously attack Obama, so that he doesn't have time to screw much up. We'll see.
 
Andy;80354]Not bitter at all. You rarely if ever speak the truth.

I know you believe ignorance is bliss and love to proselytize your bliss... that's what I know.

Straw-man. I'm not trying to distance myself at all. I am explaining the view that I have always had, and still have. Bush was not nearly as bad as you claim. He did some very good things.

Well give him a big wet kiss goodbye because he and his cronies have been put in the JUNK/DELETE file!:D

I'm not like you. I don't play partisan politics. Nor am I an "all or nothing" idiot, that can't see the good for the bad, or the reverse. In short, I think. I don't just play the "he screwed up everything" or the "he's perfect" cards. I didn't when Clinton was in office either. He passed some good things as well.

I'm not purely one sided either Andy. This particular cycle has mostly revolved around continuing Bush type policies with McCain or go Obama. That's a very clear choice in my opinion so I endeavor to explain why.

I'll gladly give you a couple past "bad" for instances on President Clinton though. While I thought Clinton was a very very good President (note: I was a registered Independent until Clinton's 2nd term) While I think it ridiculous to delve into someone's personal private life "all things being done being legal" the skirt chasing stopped him from being even more effective and also cost Gore his election.

On a policy note we now see that while well intended NAFTA was not a good deal for America or it's workers. It was well intended by hoping to bring other countries up standards wise and open more trade possibilities to everyone, but ended up keeping them pretty much where they were only to be able to flood our markets even more.


For the left, it sure seems like most vote that way. At work a lady there railed and railed about Amnesty, than talk about how the democrats were going to fix that.

Politics can be confusing to people that don't keep up with it. John McCain himself was Mr. Amnesty at one time. Many people don't know every position on every issue. But in the end they make a decision and that's their vote and they're entitled to it.

I for instance vote more because of Party platform than the individual candidates personality. Although this time the candidate was exceptional and could actually carry the show on his own I think.


I won't have to worry about putting gas in my car, I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage.

This is what I run into constantly. People who believe that Obama is going to pay for everyone's gas. Obama is going to make everything free. Obama is going to stop illegal immigration. Obama is going to solve all everything.

I have even met people who voted for Obama specifically because they believed he was the messiah. There's another video on youtube, where they exit poll people and ask them various questions about policy and people. Most couldn't even name who Obama's VP was. Other's didn't know where he stood on most issues.

The left is the most ignorant group of people I've ever met.

Well I believe there's a combination thing going on here. I think that you're twisting and exaggerating the expressions of people who wanted a major change from Bush & Republican policies and see overall change for the better a possibility under President Obama.

And hey you're there... maybe the whole place really just isn't all that bright I don't know?:D... just kidding buddy...


No, the problem was we lost the political right to Ron Paul. Palin was the only thing the made the ticket interesting. Look, McCain was about as moderate as one gets. There's no denying that. Just go look who he voted with most of the time. Look at his Senate voting record. He even supported the Bailout, when conservatives were going nutz against it.

Well let's at least agree the Republican Brand is bad dog food and Palin put it in a pretty can... but losers all the same.

Getting the moderate vote wasn't the problem. That's the only vote he had. The only conservatives that voted for McCain, were one's that thought Obama would be worse.

How much is moonshine in your holler?:eek: The Republican base were licking McCain's & Palin's boots at the end. Everybody else was either Obama or trended Obama.

That's exactly how I view the left. Even after the election, most of the new threads on this forum were "WAHHHHHH BUSH! WAHHHHH MCCAIN!". Nothing changes with you people. When there's nothing to complain about, you'll complain that there should be.

That was the American people crying in pain you were hearing... seriously is your real name Napoleon Dynamite!:D You still haven't figured that out?

It was a terrible 8 years led into the biggest ditch we could imagine. People got together, voted, and now we finally have a chance to change things.

Let's pull together for a moment and see if we can't better something... we're already well aware what bad looks like.
 
I know you believe ignorance is bliss and love to proselytize your bliss... that's what I know.

Which explains why you use so many smiley faces in your posts.

Well give him a big wet kiss goodbye because he and his cronies have been put in the JUNK/DELETE file!:D

I rest my case from above.

I'm not purely one sided either Andy. This particular cycle has mostly revolved around continuing Bush type policies with McCain or go Obama. That's a very clear choice in my opinion so I endeavor to explain why.


Right. Obama wants to continue bailouts, wants to continue the war, only in afghanistan (which Bush planned to do now that Iraq is clearly finished), wants to give a middle class tax cut (Bush supported tax cuts), and doesn't mind deficit spending (something supposedly Bush's fault). In other words, nothing has changed.

On a policy note we now see that while well intended NAFTA was not a good deal for America or it's workers. It was well intended by hoping to bring other countries up standards wise and open more trade possibilities to everyone, but ended up keeping them pretty much where they were only to be able to flood our markets even more.
Funny, I thought that our economy boomed during Clinton, according to you guys. So which is it? Did NAFTA signed in 1993 have horrible consequences for our economy? Or did our economy boom? You can't claim both. Either it worked and we had a good economy, or it didn't and we had a bad economy. Do explain your reasoning. Once again, you never seem to know much about any topic.

Politics can be confusing to people that don't keep up with it. John McCain himself was Mr. Amnesty at one time. Many people don't know every position on every issue. But in the end they make a decision and that's their vote and they're entitled to it.


Like I said before, McCain is a democrat with a republican name badge. There was no conservative candidate this election. Obama has no more of a mandate to me, than if he won by default.

Well I believe there's a combination thing going on here. I think that you're twisting and exaggerating the expressions of people who wanted a major change from Bush & Republican policies and see overall change for the better a possibility under President Obama.


I just watched another video of a Obama rally in LA. The people there were screaming about Illegal Immigration, and then said support Obama. Then talked about Mexicans taking their jobs. The guy behind the camera asked, asked why they supported Obama, when he supported Amnesty.

First they denied he supported Amnesty. Then after being told he did, they suddenly switched to saying we're all illegal immigrants.

This is not an exaggeration. If you want I can post that video, and a dozen more from all across the country of people not having a clue what Obama stood for, and yet supporting him without reason.

Well let's at least agree the Republican Brand is bad dog food and Palin put it in a pretty can... but losers all the same.

Nah. We had bad options. The only one that actually was different from Obama, was the first to drop out. Fred Thompson would have won easy, if he could have only gotten his campaign off the ground.

Too many people thought like you did. That the problem was attracting the middle, and being centrist. McCain was as far left as one could go in the Republican party, and lost by a land slide.

It was a terrible 8 years led into the biggest ditch we could imagine. People got together, voted, and now we finally have a chance to change things.

Hasn't been terrible for me. I've been asking around. I have yet to find anyone that had a "terrible 8 years". At least not speaking honestly. A few came up with some BS, like lighting hit my house. Oh that darn Bush.


More brilliant Obama supporters. Note the lady saying our jobs are going to Poland, and the other saying Tax cuts are the main reason he's voting for Obama.

Let's pull together for a moment and see if we can't better something... we're already well aware what bad looks like.

Yeah. Bad looks like Obama voters talking.
 
Which explains why you use so many smiley faces in your posts.

Yes Andy... you amuse me sometimes and it makes me smile.:D

Right. Obama wants to continue bailouts, wants to continue the war, only in afghanistan (which Bush planned to do now that Iraq is clearly finished), wants to give a middle class tax cut (Bush supported tax cuts), and doesn't mind deficit spending (something supposedly Bush's fault). In other words, nothing has changed.

Well let's see what happens before we say nothing good can happen. That seems the reasonable thing to do. I'm never going to agree that being in a bad spot can't be changed by taking a new course. And I think almost nobody believes President Obama will be anything like Bush. And to be factually accurate Bush came over closer to Obama's stated positions... not the other way around.

On a policy note we now see that while well intended NAFTA was not a good deal for America or it's workers. It was well intended by hoping to bring other countries up standards wise and open more trade possibilities to everyone, but ended up keeping them pretty much where they were only to be able to flood our markets even more. [/COLOR]

Funny, I thought that our economy boomed during Clinton, according to you guys. So which is it? Did NAFTA signed in 1993 have horrible consequences for our economy? Or did our economy boom? You can't claim both. Either it worked and we had a good economy, or it didn't and we had a bad economy. Do explain your reasoning. Once again, you never seem to know much about any topic.

Well of course I can Andy if both statements are true and not mutually exclusive. The economy ranged between good to great & wonderful under President Clinton's 8 years in office. But NAFTA did not evolve the way everyone wished that it had or the way it was supposed to.

Did you not ask me to give you an example of a circumstance the Democrats lead on that did not turn out perfectly... I'm trying!:)


Like I said before, McCain is a democrat with a republican name badge. There was no conservative candidate this election. Obama has no more of a mandate to me, than if he won by default.

Well polling shows differently and you yourself raved about the Conservative Caribou Barbie on the ticket. As far as you not supporting Obama now...... REALLY! I'm sure that's caught everyone completely by surprise!:D

Nah. We had bad options. The only one that actually was different from Obama, was the first to drop out. Fred Thompson would have won easy, if he could have only gotten his campaign off the ground.

And he couldn't get his campaign off the ground (that's called lack of money & support) because he too sucked.

Andy the 20th is coming in just a few days. Let's give the guy a chance to actually take charge, be in the Oval Office and see if it's not a lot better than you think right now.

We can disagree without being disagreeable. After all we're all Americans and we want things to get better.
 
Well let's see what happens before we say nothing good can happen. That seems the reasonable thing to do. I'm never going to agree that being in a bad spot can't be changed by taking a new course. And I think almost nobody believes President Obama will be anything like Bush. And to be factually accurate Bush came over closer to Obama's stated positions... not the other way around.

I never saw the two positions being that different.

Well of course I can Andy if both statements are true and not mutually exclusive. The economy ranged between good to great & wonderful under President Clinton's 8 years in office. But NAFTA did not evolve the way everyone wished that it had or the way it was supposed to.

Did you not ask me to give you an example of a circumstance the Democrats lead on that did not turn out perfectly... I'm trying!:)

lol. After a dozen things they championed that failed, like CRA and the sub-prime loan, you choose something that worked fine, and complain it was a mistake. I like that. Black really is white, right is really wrong, Obama is for hope and change... It all fits perfectly.... if your insane.

Well polling shows differently and you yourself raved about the Conservative Caribou Barbie on the ticket. As far as you not supporting Obama now...... REALLY! I'm sure that's caught everyone completely by surprise!:D

It's funny, I saw a McCain/Palin sticker on a car the other day, where they x-out McCain. Another one said "Palin! Finely a reason to vote!".

As for these polls, I don't know who was polled, or if I believe any of them. Granted I have no more evidence than the hundreds of videos on the internet, each one with dozens on dozens of voters each, that were completely ignorant and stupid. Saying things like "Obama's going to pay my gas and mortgage bills".

My personal experience has been that most Obama supporters have been completely stupid. Most named issues that Obama was against, as reasons for voting for him. Like the Bailout. How many democrats here, railed about the bailout as being corporate welfare. Yet Obama supported the bailout, and said he believes it has (past tense) had a positive effect. Or democrats railing about deficits and debt, but Obama says he plans to increase deficit spending, and automatically the debt.

Over and over, democrats have been consistently all idiots.

Hearsay removed.

Andy the 20th is coming in just a few days. Let's give the guy a chance to actually take charge, be in the Oval Office and see if it's not a lot better than you think right now.

We can disagree without being disagreeable. After all we're all Americans and we want things to get better.

Absolutely, by stopping this socialist idiot.
 
Werbung:
Perfect example: The KKK always endorses the Republican.
.....For obviou$-rea$on$.....​
"Barbour, the former chairman of the Republican National Committee with close ties to the Bush administration, has definitely proved more successful than his maligned Louisiana counterpart, Democratic Gov. Kathleen Blanco, in one respect: lobbying Washington for cash. In fact, Barbour's ability to steer a lopsided share of Katrina money to Mississippi has touched off a firestorm of outrage in Louisiana, which suffered considerably more destruction from the storm.

Consider the Gulf Coast housing crisis, one of the key issues that has kept nearly half the population of New Orleans from returning to the city since Katrina. More than 75 percent of the housing damage from the storm was in Louisiana, but Mississippi has received 70 percent of the funds through FEMA's Alternative Housing Pilot Program. Of the $388 million available, FEMA gave a Mississippi program offering upgraded trailers more than $275 million. Meanwhile, the agency awarded Louisiana's "Katrina Cottage" program, which features more permanent modular homes for storm victims, a mere $75 million."
 
Back
Top