The first Clinton and Trump debate

Largely true but there are some weighing lesser of evils still. Some already swung trump based on last night.

 

Not many, but then the race is so close that even a few could alter the outcome of the election.

Interesting fact check of the first debate here.

The debate didn't change my mind at all. I thought Trump was unacceptable before, and now I'm certain of it.

 

And I found hrc to be even more stupid than I imagined

 

see? No one has changed their minds.

It's a choice between totally unacceptable, and merely not the greatest choice.

The disagreement is between which is which.

 

Interesting way to put it.

Setting aside the character issues we hAve with hrc:
Massive tax increases supposedly on the evil rich
Infrastructure to provide jobs to her grandchild and all the new illegals
This despite bo doing the same thing but they wound up being paid by the middle class and virtually no infrastructure got done that was not already funded.

Hrc offers more of the same foreign policy that destabilized the ME and spawned a virulent ISIS from a contained alqada which quickly expanded to Europe and America thanks to a mystifying abandonment of rule of law. A string of embarrassments giving Vlad Putin an endless string of punch lines to make America look the fool world wide and embolden PRC to use their new found wealth that used to be ours to make a military within reach of ours.

As appealing as 4 more years of that sounds, giving the .01%ers a trillion a year to feather their nests with printed money is unacceptable to me.

You could not find a worse choice than hrc with the possible exception of Tim kaine.

 

1 Politifact: True:

2 I don't recall her offering to invade yet another Middle East nation.

3. 4 more years of the same as we've had the past 16 doesn't sound nearly as bad as four years of unknown and a massive increase in the deficit.

 

So let's ponder this. Guys that stand to lose trillions find Trumps numbers nutso but hrc's are inviolate. Now other dems also made glorious projections that never approached coming to pass. And amazingly enough there are some who can't seem to grasp that it's the same wall street that "invested" God only knows how much in the donkeys that poo poo DJT.
And isn't this the very reason we have the strangest election in generations ? And didn't the donkeys used to poo poo lobbyists for representing the monied interests ? Now they deal direct.
Hilarious.

 

@dogtowner But what about his character? Isn't he a lunatic?

 

No, he's not a lunatic.
Neither is he a polititian. Some see that as a bad thing. Politicians have put us 20 trillion in debt, up 10 trillion in the last 8 years. I don't see that as good.
Want to talk character, ok.
HRC lies about her job as a public servant and has everyone lie to support that. Once upon a time a president who turned out to be a crook had to quit before he was ousted. Now they just shoot for higher office. DJT lies about the same things pols have lied about since there were pols. Paragon of virtue ? Nope. But there is a significant difference.
This country is in a pickle and status quo is unacceptable. Some like the status quo, especially those riding the gov't gravy train. One candidate wants to drive the gravy train, the other wants it derailed.
We shall see which the citizens prefer.

 

Yes, but my question was about his character, not hers.

 

And I believe I addressed both.
As to extramarital sex, it is common not just here but in your part of the world and neither is it new. I'm related to Henry VIII by way of a bastard son. If that's to be a disqualified I doubt 1% of pols would make the grade. It's a degree of severity that's what we are left to ponder. To suggest the two are even close is more than a stretch.