The goal of obamacare

Why is there a picture of Karl Marx in reference to progressive socialism, who's found was Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar. Again...I don't think you know what the words you use mean.
You seriously suffer from foot in mouth disease... If you continue to get owned, Obama might try to nationalize you.

You cited a collectivist who's "Progressive Utilization Theory" has never been cited, or referenced, as having anything to do with the Progressive movement in America.

Sarkar's first principle:

"No individual should be allowed to accumulate any physical wealth without the clear permission or approval of the collective body."

Robeph, I deny you permission to accumulate any physical wealth.

Contemporary American Progressivism grew out of social activism movements, AKA, the New Left, who's inspirations and influences are a veritable who's who in Socialist and Marxist ideology with a number of very notable names, Mao Zedong, Che Guevara, Ho Chi Minh, Vladimir Lenin among them.

Progressives: The Anti-Liberals
 
Werbung:
You seriously suffer from foot in mouth disease... If you continue to get owned, Obama might try to nationalize you.

You cited a collectivist who's "Progressive Utilization Theory" has never been cited, or referenced, as having anything to do with the Progressive movement in America.

Sarkar's first principle:

"No individual should be allowed to accumulate any physical wealth without the clear permission or approval of the collective body."

Robeph, I deny you permission to accumulate any physical wealth.

Contemporary American Progressivism grew out of social activism movements, AKA, the New Left, who's inspirations and influences are a veritable who's who in Socialist and Marxist ideology with a number of very notable names, Mao Zedong, Che Guevara, Ho Chi Minh, Vladimir Lenin among them.

Progressives: The Anti-Liberals

You're the one who called it progressive socialism which is the term used for Progressive Utilization Theory. At least at the univeristy's polisci courses, of course they probably don't know as much about all this as you do.

I don't know what I suffer from, but I do know that in multiple threads you seem to misuse words of the english language in some pretty wild ways.
 
You're the one who called it progressive socialism which is the term used for Progressive Utilization Theory. At least at the univeristy's polisci courses, of course they probably don't know as much about all this as you do.
Is the term "Progressive Socialism" as reference to PROUT standard at all universities, or just at the University of Phoenix online?

Obama campaigning for a socialist:

Bernie Sanders is a self-described democratic socialist, but because he does not belong to a formal political party, he appears as an independent on the ballot. He is the first democratic socialist to be elected to the U.S. Senate.[1] Sanders caucuses with the Democratic Party and is counted as a Democrat for the purposes of committee assignments.

"I chose my friends carefully.The more politically active black students.The foreign students.The Chicanos.The Marxist Professors and the structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets.At night,in the dorms,we discussed neocolonialism,Franz Fanon,Eurocentrism,and patriarchy." - Obama, Dreams of my Father

He surrounds himself with Marxists, Socialists and Communists... Oh, but its "Right Wing Nuttery" to point out his love affair with Marxist Socialism. :rolleyes:
Orwell_Obama_Logo.jpg

I don't know what I suffer from,
You suffer from foot in mouth disease... Which is probably why once your mouth is full, you try to speak out of your anus. At least that explains the verbal diarrhea.
but I do know that in multiple threads you seem to misuse words of the english language in some pretty wild ways.
I notice you didn't cite any specific examples...

It's you who doesn't know the difference between the trade deficit and the federal deficit....
debtstar.jpg
 
Is the term "Progressive Socialism" as reference to PROUT standard at all universities, or just at the University of Phoenix online?

Hah. Yeah I guess so, maybe I should have attend a real school, like UAB medical, where I could've gotten my EMS licensure, or UAH (one of the leading CS/engineering schools in the US) I should've gone there for my undergrad. Or maybe I could have completed my graduate studies at UT/Knox in something cool like Forensic Anthropology/Osteology. I might have even had a PhD by now if I hadn't wasted all my time working at McDonald's and taking part-time courses at the Uni of Phoenix.

To address this however, let me mention that the Sarkar coined the term himself and his organization began in the mid fifties. I think he is given the license due to prior art. You can't just can't decide that it no longer means what it has for 60 years.


Ah, democratic socialism, could've SWORN you said progressive. My bad.


You suffer from foot in mouth disease... Which is probably why once your mouth is full, you try to speak out of your anus. At least that explains the verbal diarrhea.

Since you said I don't cite what your inability to correctly understand words, let me point out the misuse of the English idiom 'foot in mouth.' This usually refers to saying something that ends up being an embarrassing situation. I don't feel I've done this and it is pretty much a self-applied title, so perhaps you should go find some other attempt at humorous detraction.

I do think that this is digressing to the point of childish remarks on your behalf, although I should probably expect no less.

I notice you didn't cite any specific examples...

Citations are not required when I've been pointing them out this whole thread. If you cannot remember, reread my posts.

It's you who doesn't know the difference between the trade deficit and the federal deficit

I didn't continue to argue with you once I realized you meant [federal] deficit when you said deficit. If you feel that just because I made a mistake and acknowledged it that it invalidates anything else I say, that isn't how things work.

You on the other hand post stupid photoshops that are little more than trite regurgitations of nonsense rightwing key-notes, as if that in any manner supports your arguments.
 
Hah. Yeah I guess so, maybe I should have attend a real school, like UAB medical, where I could've gotten my EMS licensure, or UAH (one of the leading CS/engineering schools in the US) I should've gone there for my undergrad. Or maybe I could have completed my graduate studies at UT/Knox in something cool like Forensic Anthropology/Osteology. I might have even had a PhD by now if I hadn't wasted all my time working at McDonald's and taking part-time courses at the Uni of Phoenix.



Just curious, why did you spell your name with a zero in it?
 
Werbung:
To address this however, let me mention that the Sarkar coined the term himself and his organization began in the mid fifties. I think he is given the license due to prior art. You can't just can't decide that it no longer means what it has for 60 years.
I guess you didn't learn about the "Progressives" at the turn of the century, in the early 1900's, decades before Sarker and his group, because they were Progressive Socialists who supported democratic socialism.

Prior to the rise of Nazi'ism, the American Progressives were in a sordid love affair with Fascism but since Fascism has come to be discredited as evil, they don't openly identify themselves as supporters of fascist policies.

Now before you spout of about things you know nothing of, I'm not talking about just Democrats. Teddy Roosevelt was both a Republican president and leader of the Progressive movement and Progressives still exist in both parties today. Both parties still show themselves to have socialist/fascist tendancies and both parties should be purged of those elements so we can return to a more liberal society.

Ah, democratic socialism, could've SWORN you said progressive. My bad.
Progressives are socialists (and Anti-Liberal). Rather than supporting revolutionary socialism, they support democratic socialism, just different paths to the same goal. You can argue against that fact all you like but the proof is in the policy and you cannot defend their policies as being something other than pro-socialist and anti-liberal.

I didn't continue to argue with you once I realized you meant [federal] deficit when you said deficit.
2 graphs about the federal deficit and a debt star poster didn't tip you off?
 
Back
Top