The Most Unethical Coward We Could Have For President

Old_Trapper70

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2014
Messages
2,383
And the right wing loves him:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-de...fense-protester-case-214131776--election.html

Trump's lawyers sought to dismiss the lawsuit by three protesters who say they were roughed up by his supporters at a March 1, 2016 rally in Louisville, Kentucky. They argued that Trump didn't intend for his supporters to use force.

Two women and a man say they were shoved and punched by audience members at Trump's command. Much of it was captured on video and widely broadcast during the campaign, showing Trump pointing at the protesters and repeating "get them out."

Judge David J. Hale in Louisville ruled Friday that the suit against Trump, his campaign and three of his supporters can proceed. Hale found ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a "direct and proximate result" of Trump's actions, and noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.

"It is plausible that Trump's direction to 'get 'em out of here' advocated the use of force," the judge wrote. "It was an order, an instruction, a command."
 
Werbung:
And the right wing loves him:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-de...fense-protester-case-214131776--election.html

Trump's lawyers sought to dismiss the lawsuit by three protesters who say they were roughed up by his supporters at a March 1, 2016 rally in Louisville, Kentucky. They argued that Trump didn't intend for his supporters to use force.

Two women and a man say they were shoved and punched by audience members at Trump's command. Much of it was captured on video and widely broadcast during the campaign, showing Trump pointing at the protesters and repeating "get them out."

Judge David J. Hale in Louisville ruled Friday that the suit against Trump, his campaign and three of his supporters can proceed. Hale found ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a "direct and proximate result" of Trump's actions, and noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.

"It is plausible that Trump's direction to 'get 'em out of here' advocated the use of force," the judge wrote. "It was an order, an instruction, a command."


This guy is so disgusting. . .if he had kept his party affiliation as "Democrat," as he was not too long ago, you better believe that he would already have been impeached!
 
Isn't this all part of the rough and tumble of a vocal protesters life?
Seems like a waste of the court's time to honest

No wonder civility is disappearing from the world of politics. If a person, especially one with influence, can incite others to do their bidding, and this coward lacks the courage to do it himself, then is their any hope for civil discourse? Granted Trump ran his campaign based on hate, anger, and racism, however, where are the limitations?
 
No wonder civility is disappearing from the world of politics. If a person, especially one with influence, can incite others to do their bidding, and this coward lacks the courage to do it himself, then is their any hope for civil discourse? Granted Trump ran his campaign based on hate, anger, and racism, however, where are the limitations?
 
Werbung:
And the right wing loves him:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-de...fense-protester-case-214131776--election.html

Trump's lawyers sought to dismiss the lawsuit by three protesters who say they were roughed up by his supporters at a March 1, 2016 rally in Louisville, Kentucky. They argued that Trump didn't intend for his supporters to use force.

Two women and a man say they were shoved and punched by audience members at Trump's command. Much of it was captured on video and widely broadcast during the campaign, showing Trump pointing at the protesters and repeating "get them out."

Judge David J. Hale in Louisville ruled Friday that the suit against Trump, his campaign and three of his supporters can proceed. Hale found ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a "direct and proximate result" of Trump's actions, and noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.

"It is plausible that Trump's direction to 'get 'em out of here' advocated the use of force," the judge wrote. "It was an order, an instruction, a command."
and bidens not unethical and a coward lol
 
Back
Top