There he goes again: This week Obama tells us he is NOT "redistributing wealth"

[Little-Acorn]

Obama's agenda has been almost exclusively devoted to taking money from "the rich" (that's almost anyone with a successful business and a payroll), and using it to give goodies to everyone else. And he admitted even before he became President, that his goal was to "spread the wealth around".

But now that people are beginning to realize what he's doing - and an election is just around the corner - Obama is now practicing some classic Orwellian doublethink. Though his actions and goals clearly haven't changed, suddenly now he's NOT trying to "redistribute wealth"... so he tells us this week.

Nothing has changed but the words. But somehow he expects us to believe him. And just forget about the last four years.

-----------------------------------------------------------

http://campaign2012.washingtonexami...bama-im-not-trying-redistribute-wealth/473116

Obama: I'm not trying to 'redistribute wealth'

by Joel Gehrke
Commentary Staff Writer

President Obama, who famously called for tax increases on the wealthy to "spread the wealth around," denied today that his tax increases on the rich are an attempt to "redistribute wealth."
"So these investments -- in things like education and research and health care -- they haven't been made as some grand scheme to redistribute wealth from one group to another," the president said today at Florida Atlantic University. "This is not some socialist dream," Obama added, as he called for tax increases on millionaires today to pay for those investments.

When he advocated the same plan in 2008, though, Obama described this "spread the wealth around" policy. "I’m gonna cut taxes a little bit more for the folks who are most in need and for the 5 percent of the folks who are doing very well – even though they’ve been working hard and I appreciate that – I just want to make sure they’re paying a little bit more in order to pay for those other tax cuts," he told Samuel Wurzelbacher (aka Joe the Plumber), who is now running for Congress.

Today, Obama similarly opposed "giving those tax breaks to folks like me who don't need them."
In 2008, Obama summarized his plan to make the tax code fairer by saying "I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody." Today, he specifically distanced himself from such a characterization of his position and -- as has been his recent habit -- made a point of rejecting the "socialism" label.

In short: Obama was careful to avoid the "spread the wealth" phrase today, but he defended the Buffett Rule by making the "spread the wealth" argument first made in 2008.

 

[dogtowner]

he is such a blatant liar.

 

[Robert Berger]

"Redistribution of wealth ?" Sheesh ! The republicans have been doing this for ages now. But they do it the opposite way as reverse
Robin Hoods, stealing from the middle class and the poor to give to those already wealthy . Some good this does America.
Giving tax breaks to the rich sounds great in theory, but it doens't work. The notion that the rich will creat ea lot of jobs if they get all the tax breaks is a myth. Prosperity does not "trickle down". It never has and never will . Supply sdide economics are great for a small number
of people who get filthy rich , but disastrous to millions of other people who are nto so fortunate.
Think I'm a commie for sayoing this ? Of course not. I have no problem with some being being and getting rich, but
when the poor and middle class are screwed by income inequality, that is not good at all .
The government cannot afford ot leave millions of innocent, honest and hard-working Americans in the lurch .

 

[dogtowner]

"Redistribution of wealth ?" Sheesh ! The republicans have been doing this for ages now. But they do it the opposite way as reverse
Robin Hoods, stealing from the middle class and the poor to give to those already wealthy . Some good this does America.
Giving tax breaks to the rich sounds great in theory, but it doens't work. The notion that the rich will creat ea lot of jobs if they get all the tax breaks is a myth. Prosperity does not "trickle down". It never has and never will . Supply sdide economics are great for a small number
of people who get filthy rich , but disastrous to millions of other people who are nto so fortunate.
Think I'm a commie for saying this ? Of course not. I have no problem with some being being and getting rich, but
when the poor and middle class are screwed by income inequality, that is not good at all .
The government cannot afford ot leave millions of innocent, honest and hard-working Americans in the lurch .

I think you're misguided for believing it. But its the current lib boilerplate party line so I'm not surprised.

Just consider as a possibility that there may be a correlation between income and education and factor in that education in this country has been deteriorating for two generations. Its more fun to just blame rich people for things but its never that simple.