Uh oh.. get ready to panic over global cooling

Werbung:
What is Stupid with following 90% of doctors or scientist. As George Cluney said cleaning up the earth will do no harm. Whether the typhoon in the Philippines was caused by Global warming, Its effects were made worst by ignoring warnings. The Philippines government is so weak it has allow millions of trees to be chop down increasing landslides. It has allow houses to be built under sea level. The increase in seas caused the flooding. This is a unique event. There have been no typhoons in November in the Philippines. The area effected s not usually subject to these types of storms. Will guest of over 300KM are unique. Disasters are more common now in the Philippines.
The only once that will lose by global warming action are miners of fosil fuels and politicians who do not want to introduce regulation and taxes.
 
I had to replace the wind sheild wipers on my truck for the up coming winter ..... was that caused by global warming, too? Think there might be a tax credit for that?
 
Aus22 said:
What is Stupid with following 90% of doctors or scientist. As George Cluney said cleaning up the earth will do no harm. Whether the typhoon in the Philippines was caused by Global warming, Its effects were made worst by ignoring warnings. The Philippines government is so weak it has allow millions of trees to be chop down increasing landslides. It has allow houses to be built under sea level. The increase in seas caused the flooding. This is a unique event. There have been no typhoons in November in the Philippines. The area effected s not usually subject to these types of storms. Will guest of over 300KM are unique. Disasters are more common now in the Philippines.
The only once that will lose by global warming action are miners of fosil fuels and politicians who do not want to introduce regulation and taxes.
Click to expand...
Nothing that has been brought for consideration does ANYTHING to clean up the earth or reduce GLOBAL CO2. EVERYTHING that hasbeen brought for consideration involves taking money out of the economy and giving it to who ? I'm happy tocontinue to reduce pollution. Its a good idea on many facets. But global warming is a scam.
 
To take action to reduce pollution will cost money.
To do nothing if global warming is true will cost more.
 
Aus22 said:
To take action to reduce pollution will cost money.
To do nothing if global warming is true will cost more.
Click to expand...
Doing something to reduce pollution has potential to save money. If a factory is emiting something it means its a side product that is being wasted. Raw materials cost money right ? Well allowing some portion of that raw material is being lost thats money down the toilet. You would be surprised to learn the degree of effort being spent over the last 25 yesrs or more to find a market for this stuff and crafting ways to recover it. The plastics plant I used to work at had found ways to recover 500000 pounds of stuff that had been getting lost. Climate change is causing nothing, the measures being recommended to combat it do nothing to combat it but removes capital from the economy thereby harming the economy by that lost wealth.
 
House Republicans pressure EPA to drop coal-plant carbon rules

Republican leaders on the House Energy and Commerce Committee are calling on the Environmental Protection Agency to withdraw its proposal to impose carbon dioxide limits on power plants.

Committee leaders sent a letter to EPA director Gina McCarthy on Friday, asking her to withdraw the proposed regulations, arguing that the agency is trying to "impose standards beyond the scope of its legal authority."

F*ck the EPA and their hoax of international wealth redistribution!
 
Co2 or carbon dioxide is a natural gas that is given off by humans.
Greenhouses even increase carbondioxide levels because it is healthy for the plants.
Although co2 does absorb heat into the atmosphere and the oceans can no longer absorb anymore of this co2.
Global warming is causing unneeded alarmism.
Some scientist get paid to say that its happening and now co2 being classified as a polutant is going to the court, how can the court say if this should be classified as a pollutant shouldn't we leave that up to the scientist?
Some scientist have even lost their jobs for daring to interject.
There is no acurate way to measure temperature so how can we possibly say if this is not normal????????
 
Senator warns Obama-friendly solar company could be 'next Solyndra'

A CALIFORNIA-BASED SOLAR company, whose investors include entrepreneur and Obama backer Elon Musk, left, received millions in federal tax credits but has lost $322 million since 2008 — prompting comparisons to the infamous Solyndra firm that went belly-up after similar federal funding in 2011.

When will this insanity ever stop?
 
Werbung:
"After many years of trials the IPCC reported simulations that mimic the historic temperature record if and only if human emissions were included in the forcings. These results have been widely misrepresented as evidence for human cause global warming. They are of course evidence only that a curve matching exercise involving many degrees of freedom has plausibly mimicked the 20th century temperature curve there exercises in virtual reality and not evidence of any type" states R.m carter a professor at the marine geophysical laboratory
 

Similar threads

dogtowner
A bullet dodged in Copenhagen
Replies
0
Views
2K
dogtowner
dogtowner
PLC1
Obesity and global warming
Replies
1
Views
2K
Dr.Who
Dr.Who
T
My opinion on climate change and clean energy
Replies
6
Views
557
Starcastle
Starcastle
A
The Great Global Warming Scam Exposed!
2
Replies
22
Views
4K
Gipper
Gipper
PLC1
No recession here.
Replies
3
Views
1K
PLC1
PLC1
Back
Top