1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

What do you think of this?

Discussion in 'U.S. Politics' started by mamab, Jan 26, 2007.

  1. mamab

    mamab New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know that not everyone here probably watches FoxNews, but someone told me about this and I had to check it out.

    http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Jan22/0,4670,HouseDelegates,00.html

    What do you think about the people in Washington DC trying to give non-citizens voting rights? IF they're going to give them voting rights, shouldn't they be more than just US territories? Shouldn't they make them become states like everyone else?
     
  2. framed

    framed New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think the goal should be to combine the territories with other states. In the mean time I'd be fine with them having full-up voting rights in the House, but definately not in the Senate.

    One from the article: "American Samoa has fewer than 60,000 people, the Virgin Islands 109,000. Guam has about 171,000." I specifically would not want such small groups of people having equal sway in the Senate as say California or Texas, but I wouldn't mind them having population weighted representation in the House. If they were states you'd have to give them both.

    Keeping them out of the Senate avoids the population problems, and rolling them into another state won't upset the balance of power between republicans and democrats in any substantive way. (One reason DC has had such a hard time becoming a state is because its always hard-core democrat. Republican states won't ratify a state that constantly votes against them. I would imagine the opposite scenerio would be true too, thats not a ding on republicans.)
     
  3. mtatum4496

    mtatum4496 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am very uncomfortable with this, simply from the perspective that I view voting privileges as one of the "perks" of being a citizen. We have enough people who think their votes don't matter as it is. I don't see this as doing anything to change their thinking.
     
  4. FourBear

    FourBear New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have a feeling that allowing non-citizens to vote would cause more problems that it would solve. I mean, there is a stipulation that only native-born citizens can serve as US president, and I don't think they are going to change that anytime soon.
     
  5. tater03

    tater03 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have not clicked onto the link yet. But just from what I can gather I am just surprised that this is being brought up at all. I mean I would think that it would just be a given that you should be a citizen.
     
  6. framed

    framed New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just to clarify, this isnt about allowing non citizens to vote. Its about how to count the votes of citizens who are not part of any state. People who live in US territories like Washington DC don't have representation in congress, dispite the fact that they are citizens and do pay taxes.
     
  7. luvcamerasnic

    luvcamerasnic New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As someone with friends who live in Guam, they shoudl consider doing something. After all, the president does affect the territories when he/she makes decisions.
     
  8. berlinlife06

    berlinlife06 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    After the way Bush lost in DC, I guess he would want to keep things that way! I actually never thought of that! So if they don't belong to any State, how can one find out about their local laws?
     
  9. framed

    framed New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As I understand it they have local governments, those goverments just have no representation at the federal level.
     

Share This Page