1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

When LOSER Liberals attack!

Discussion in 'U.S. Politics' started by Bob the Builder, Jul 12, 2009.

  1. Bob the Builder

    Bob the Builder New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's not bad enough that a raving RACIST like Sotomayor thinks that white firefighters shouldn't get their promotions because they're.....white, but now since the Supreme Court ruled that her head was shoved ALL the way up her a$$ when she made that ruling, the looney loser libtard Demoncraps have decided to pull the same crap that they did to Palin, ATTACK THE VICTIM!! :mad:

    SAVE AMERICA, OUTLAW LIBERALS!!!
     
  2. ASPCA4EVER

    ASPCA4EVER New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,555
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Land of the JAYHAWKS-ROCK CHOCK Jayhawk, KU
    Yet, the only resounding "raving RACIST" that I read around here is YOU...LMAO

    How you manage to connect those 'magic marker dots' right back to Supreme Court Nominee Sotomayer is just truly amazing...your entire article is about 'supporters'...nowhere/anywhere does it mention her involvement!!!

    And despite your 'hysterical ranting'...she ruled according the the letter of the law {as any judge would have}...don't like her ruling then go to that state, city, county and make them change the law. You know, kind of like...PUT UP OR SHUT UP. :D:D:D

    BTW...'LOONY' doesn't have an 'E' in it...wizard of the illiterate words...LMAO
     
  3. top gun

    top gun New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    4,940
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ohio, USA
    ASPCA are you out of your mind?;) Do you not understand?

    Here I speak Republicant... let me try and explain...

    Bob is merely trying to address the illegal immigration problem. He's trying to protect America from the Beaner invasion. Now after all his hard work we have a judge that's Puerto Rican or Cuban or something.... one of those unAmerican tribes, and it upsets him that she ruled on the firefighter case according to the standing precedent at the time.

    It's glaringly obvious that because she's been caught, CAUGHT I SAY, speaking highly of her Latina roots that she was trying to infiltrate and bring into the Hispanic fold the Black race (the other firefighters) in an attempt to overthrow White America and all we stand for!

    Now it may be true that 4 White Justices out of the 9 Justices sitting currently on the Supreme Court ruled on the issue in the EXACT SAME WAY...

    but look over here...


    no way over here...





    Did I mention she was Puerto Rican and there were Blacks involved?


    You now owe Bob an apology.
     
  4. Bob the Builder

    Bob the Builder New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes she is, and no she doesn't (but then again, neither do YOU!)


    What's the matter tg, don't you watch the news? Didn't you read the ruling? It as 9-0 in favor of the Firefighters. The 4 "dissenting" votes were over the reasons the other 5 gave for supporting the Firefighters and AGAINST that racist Sotomayor!

    So what if she's Puerto Rican, and which Blacks were involved? Are you talking about Justice Thomas, or are you talking about the Black Firefighters who didn't study as hard, didn't apply themselves as hard, and therefore didn't do as well on the test as the Firefighters who DID study and apply themselves? Oh, and don't forget that at least one of the Firefighters that she ruled against was also Latino!

    Sotomayor is a JOKE. She's a RACIST, she's a bigot, and she's a LOUSY JUDGE, having been overturned on appeal more times than ANY other Supreme Court nominee.

    Yes she does, and so do you.
     
  5. top gun

    top gun New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    4,940
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ohio, USA
     
  6. gazanita

    gazanita New Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    are there any lefties on this site!
     
  7. pocketfullofshells

    pocketfullofshells Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2008
    Messages:
    12,009
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    land of 10,000 lakes and 2 senators again
    I should hope you would be able to figure that out yourself
     
  8. Bob the Builder

    Bob the Builder New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nina Totenberg?? If you're getting your information from that ditz, it's no wonder you don't know anything!!! ROTFLMFAO!!!
     
  9. ASPCA4EVER

    ASPCA4EVER New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,555
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Land of the JAYHAWKS-ROCK CHOCK Jayhawk, KU


    Never fear TopGun...I understood the 'JOKE'...some of the over the top self inflated ego's just don't get the 'tongue in cheek' sense of humor that we share...it goes right over that 'pointed head' or 'though the echo chamber of the empty brain cavity'...LMAO ;)
     
  10. GenSeneca

    GenSeneca Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    6,245
    Likes Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    ={CaLiCo}= HQ
    General Custer had "great experience" too, simply making a "whole lot of rulings" doesn't mean she is qualified to hold the bench.
     
  11. top gun

    top gun New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    4,940
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ohio, USA
    As long as you're able to grasp the fact that 4 out of 9 Justices agreed with the Sotomayor decision...

    and also interestingly had she been on the court at the time ruling on a similar case the High Courts ruling would have been 5 to 4 the other way...

    then my point is made.
     
  12. GenSeneca

    GenSeneca Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    6,245
    Likes Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    ={CaLiCo}= HQ
    Its no surprise that someone who supports policies that discriminate based on race would also support a judge that discriminates based on race. At least in your support of discrimination based on race, you are consistent.
     
    1 person likes this.
  13. top gun

    top gun New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    4,940
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ohio, USA
    Well I've even heard Republicants on the Sunday talk shows that think she's too Liberal say strictly from a qualifications standard she's extremely qualified and has exactly the legal and judicial background one would look for in a Supreme Court nominee...:D

    She will be our next Justice.




     
  14. GenSeneca

    GenSeneca Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    6,245
    Likes Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    ={CaLiCo}= HQ


    Which is why they deserve to lose every election until they begin standing up for Individual Rights.
     
  15. Bob the Builder

    Bob the Builder New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, they did NOT agree with her decision, they simply disagreed with the reason the other 5 Justices used for over-ruling her decision. HUGE difference.
     
Loading...

Share This Page