New Year's Eve At The Kennedy Center!!!

Phoenix68

Phoenix68

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2022
Messages
17,323
.
FUCK YOU, SPANKY!!!!
December 30, 2025
.​
“When American history starts getting treated like something you can ban, erase, rename, or rebrand for somebody else’s ego, I can’t stand on that stage and sleep right at night.”
.​
 
Werbung:
Phoenix68 said:
.
FUCK YOU, SPANKY!!!!
December 30, 2025
.​
“When American history starts getting treated like something you can ban, erase, rename, or rebrand for somebody else’s ego, I can’t stand on that stage and sleep right at night.”
.​
Click to expand...
I have no problem with a building being named after Trump after hundreds of buildings have been named for the Marxist MLK.
 
MLK wanted equality and justice: Trump stands for bigotry and oligarchy by Fascist billionaires. Nothing should be named for Shitshizpants.
 
Gabriel_Bell said:
MLK wanted equality and justice: Trump stands for bigotry and oligarchy by Fascist billionaires. Nothing should be named for Shitshizpants.
Click to expand...
Democrats loved MLK and hate Trump for political, religious, and philosophical reasons that are contrary to traditional American views and values.
 
mark francis said:
955 streets
As of the latest estimates, there are at least 955 streets named after Martin Luther King Jr. in the United States, spread across 41 states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico. This number has been increasing over the years, reflecting the growing recognition of King's legacy and the importance of his contributions to civil rights and social justice.

Wikipedia+3
Click to expand...
.​
mark francis said:
I have no problem with a building being named after Trump after hundreds of buildings have been named for the Marxist MLK.
Click to expand...
.
maxresdefault.jpg

.
"BUSTED, AGAIN!!!!!"
.​
 
 
MLK was NOT A MARXIST! At no time did he ever advocate that the mean of production should be taken over by the government, which is a basic tenet of Marx. MakFrancis is a dummy and has no clue what Marxism, socialism, communism or even capitalism really are.

Of course, MLK was certainly better American than Robert E Lee, who whipped his slaves for escaping, and who attacked the national government and caused the death of many many of his fellow Americans.

Let us note here that Mark Francis thinks that Robert E Lee's statues should be allowed to stand, and that streets named after MLK be renamed.

Why is that? Because he is a racist and a dummy!
 
Gabriel_Bell said:
MLK was NOT A MARXIST! At no time did he ever advocate that the mean of production should be taken over by the government, which is a basic tenet of Marx. MakFrancis is a dummy and has no clue what Marxism, socialism, communism or even capitalism really are.

Of course, MLK was certainly better American than Robert E Lee, who whipped his slaves for escaping, and who attacked the national government and caused the death of many many of his fellow Americans.

Let us note here that Mark Francis thinks that Robert E Lee's statues should be allowed to stand, and that streets named after MLK be renamed.

Why is that? Because he is a racist and a dummy!
Click to expand...

Communism

kinginstitute.stanford.edu kinginstitute.stanford.edu

Bob Fitch photography archive, © Stanford University Libraries
In the Cold War climate of the 1950s and 1960s, the threat of communism galvanized public attention. In 1953 Martin Luther King called communism “one of the most important issues of our day” (Papers 6:146). As King rose to prominence he frequently had to defend himself against allegations of being a Communist, though his view that “Communism and Christianity are fundamentally incompatible” did not change (King, Strength, 93). Although sympathetic to communism’s core concern with social justice, King complained that with its “cold atheism wrapped in the garments of materialism, communism provides no place for God or Christ” (Strength, 94).

King first studied communism on his own while a student at Crozer Theological Seminary in 1949. In his 1958 memoir, he reported that although he rejected communism’s central tenets, he was sympathetic to Marx’s critique of capitalism, finding the “gulf between superfluous wealth and abject poverty” that existed in the United States morally wrong (Stride, 94). Writing his future wife, Coretta Scott, during the first summer of their relationship, he told her that he was “more socialistic in my economic theory than capitalistic. And yet I am not so opposed to capitalism that I have failed to see its relative merits” (Papers 6:123; 125).
 
Marx's criticism of capitalism is in many ways accurate: Capitalism rewards the wealthiest and punishes those who lack resources, that is clear.
Capitalism is NOT a form of government. It is a way of encouraging people with money to invest to band together to support lucrative enterprises, regardless of whether they benefit or harm the society.
Capitalism is the technique used by the Communist Party of the People's Republic of China to grow the Chinese economy to the second largest in the world.
No purely Communist government can function successfully.
No purely Capitalist government can function successfully.

The most successful nations have ALWAYS combined capitalism with socialistic elements. Everyone with a brain knows this.

But you don't. Why is that?
 
Gabriel_Bell said:
Marx's criticism of capitalism is in many ways accurate: Capitalism rewards the wealthiest and punishes those who lack resources, that is clear.
Capitalism is NOT a form of government. It is a way of encouraging people with money to invest to band together to support lucrative enterprises, regardless of whether they benefit or harm the society.
Capitalism is the technique used by the Communist Party of the People's Republic of China to grow the Chinese economy to the second largest in the world.
No purely Communist government can function successfully.
No purely Capitalist government can function successfully.

The most successful nations have ALWAYS combined capitalism with socialistic elements. Everyone with a brain knows this.

But you don't. Why is that?
Click to expand...
Marx was a buffoon. It is hard to argue against Darwin with buffoons like baboons deceiving people into thinking degeneracy and depravity are civilized human behaviors.
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
Marx was a buffoon. It is hard to argue against Darwin with buffoons like baboons deceiving people into thinking degeneracy and depravity are civilized human behaviors.
Click to expand...

Now you are an expert on Karl Marx

What data in Das Kapital is wrong, comrade ?

The second sentence is a nonsense. Please explain

comrade Stlain
moscow
 

Similar threads

Little-Acorn
A bill so reckless it has to be rammed through on a partisan vote on Christmas eve
Replies
13
Views
2K
top gun
top gun
Stalin
Much of the US will be uninhabitable in 5-10 years
Replies
6
Views
111
mark francis
M
Phoenix68
Spanky Is OVERJOYED!!!!!!
Replies
3
Views
47
mark francis
M
N
a little about a good man..
Replies
8
Views
2K
Phoenix68
Phoenix68
Stalin
Say What Idiot Sociopath: Dems Caved To This
Replies
1
Views
33
mark francis
M
Back
Top