A California Win For Sanders?

[Reddie]

There's still some talk that Sanders can win the Democrats nomination. Those who still expect the impossible to happen believe that should Hillary lose in California, this would give him a fighting chance but after Tuesday I'm sure that Sanders will be done.

What I don't get is why Democrats are so eager to hand Hillary the nomination despite all evidence that suggests that she wouldn't beat Trump.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/poll-trump-hillary-clinton-223713

Donald Trump has nearly pulled even with Hillary Clinton, according to the results of the NBC News/SurveyMonkey weekly tracking poll released Tuesday.

While Clinton is looking to wrap up the Democratic nomination with a strong performance in the final group of states on June 7, her advantage in a hypothetical matchup against the Republican nominee has dwindled by the week. Over the last seven days, Clinton led Trump 47 percent to 45 percent, with the Manhattan businessman drawing 2 points closer since the last weekly survey.

But would Sanders fare any better if perchance he was to be the Democrats nominee? I doubt it.

 

[dogtowner]

There's still some talk that Sanders can win the Democrats nomination. Those who still expect the impossible to happen believe that should Hillary lose in California, this would give him a fighting chance but after Tuesday I'm sure that Sanders will be done.

What I don't get is why Democrats are so eager to hand Hillary the nomination despite all evidence that suggests that she wouldn't beat Trump.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/poll-trump-hillary-clinton-223713

But would Sanders fare any better if perchance he was to be the Democrats nominee? I doubt it.

Polling suggests he would. I'm not so sure but based on what he's done to date I wouldn't count him out

 

[Zanna]

Sanders is a persona that gives the impression of a seasoned wise man. He has his mishaps but his political career as an independent politician is too powerful to brush aside. Trump on the other hand relies on shock-value.
Both of these two people are deemed anti-systemic by their respective parties that promote the idea of change in their own completely different perspectives, so we're talking about a tier of politicians that are expected to be wild cards...whereas Clinton is the most predictable, system-rooted politician of the three.

 

[yiostheoy]

Did you settle this issue in your mind yet?