Reply to thread

So it is the publishing or the preaching of words deemed to be offensive that are being regulated? And the regulations are being enforced unequally?


In other cases I have seen like this the actual words (which represent the thoughts) are often not all that hateful. But does it matter how large or small the offense is? Should the state intervene in regulating offensive thoughts that are very offensive but not those that are less offensive, or is the very nature of a state regulating ones thoughts too much?


Back
Top