Your projection is irrelevant.
Erroneous and immaterial.
The scientific consensually accepted test to determine if something is alive remains consensually accepted no matter how many, many places it's presented.
Your "article" and the consensually accepted test to determine if something is alive are two different things.
Your "article" is immaterial.
The criteria test for a living being is germane, standing alone as it does on its own merit.
Again, your "article" is immaterial.
I didn't reference your article.
I referenced the consenually accepted test to determine if an entity is alive.
The sophistry story you are attempting to weave here is obvious, erroneous, of course, but obvious.
You may be in error here, but that's somewhat irrelevent -- we're not talking about viruses, Lagboltz.
We're talking about a newly conceived human being.
Your divertive digression does not address the topic matter.
And speciously by you to suit your pro-abortion purposes, no doubt.
Again with your "article". 
You are a homosapien life form, according to DNA analysis.
Are you alive?
Yes, according to life science by virtue that you pass the seven criteria for being a living entity, an individual living being.
It really is that simple, Lagboltz.
The DNA analysis determined that the newly conceived is a life form.
The consensually accepted test for determining if an entity is alive determined that the newly conceived is alive.
Thus the newly conceived is a living human being.
***
Though you would prefer to belittlingly demean that which DNA and life science that jibes with intuitive obvious reality have proven beyond rational conjecture to be a living being, the reason you do so is reflected in your initial projection ... and, in all fairness, you need to come clean about what appear to be your pre-conceived motivating reasons for not wanting to accept that a conception is a living human being in that person's earliest stage of being.
So, instead of accusing others of being dishonest, perhaps before you say anything more on the matter, you may want to be honest yourself and state your true motivation for denying the obvious realities I presented in the opening threads.
