Reply to thread

You copied and pasted a source and refused to give the source of the citation. The criteria you cited were given in wikipedia, but you said that was not your source.  Until you give the source so we can judge the context of the source, you have no scientific argument.

I'm sorry but you have no credibility.  You are now trying to read motivation in me that does not exist and making an argument against that --- very poor science.

Again, you are making incorrect assumptions and arguing that.  You are way out of the league of science and the type of thinking that is needed to make rational arguments.

 I was answering a post by Dr. Who.  It had nothing to do with the OP.

 The type of arguments you are making are cheap.  You invent some ridiculous thoughts, pretend I am thinking those ridiculous thoughts, and then argue against it. You are carrying on the pretense of a scientific argument, and conspicuously stray from that.  Shame on you for your childish post.