This is a multifaceted situation. There are many circumstances in both life & within the law were the termination of things including life is allowed. The world is not a perfect place and there must be some lead way.
When we've forced people opposed to war to kill and be killed... that's killing. When we do a prior military assessment and civilian collateral damage (death of the innocent) is garanteed... we still do it. And many a person has been put to death by legal systems all throughout the world and here in the US that were innocent of any crime.
The cluster of a few cell up to viability is something that both birth control can terminated and/or the choice of the host (woman). And it will ALWAYS remain that way as in all of time for one very simple and fundamental reason... you can't FORCE a person to carry a child to term... can't be done.
Not true. In all these age group you site they do not require the use of a singular persons body to survive. You cannot FORCE a woman to bear children.
It's not a matter of "full" "potential". It's a matter of government forcing incubation against someones will. The only "potential" involved here is that something cannot survive left on its own.
SKIPPING THROUGH SEVERAL LINES OF REPETITIVE ANTI CHOICE PROPAGANDA HERE TO ADDRESS JUST A FEW MORE.
Here the Pro Choice person is merely stating fact. The Birth Control Pill has been around for decades and is the main contraception of choice. There's no need to add needless drama. It's a documented fact that the majority of people in the US a Pro Choice but I'd be willing to say probably more than 95% are perfectly fine with the Birth Control Pill.
The reason for that is it's a reasonable birth control method. We could go off into Never Never Land and say an unexplained miscarriage is a suicide and a woman who refuses bed rest & jogs when pregnant and aborts is a murderer but that's all pretty ridiculous as well.
Denying this is what's futile my friend...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWeXOjsv58c
