The court is wrong according to medical science as well. I have provided credible material that proves that they were wrong. How about you provide some credible material that they were right in their assumption that unborns are not, in reality, living human beings. Can you do that?
You understand it based on what? Your feelings? Your wishes? Certainly not on the basis of any credible scientific knowledge.
Since I am not a fundamentalist, they do not influence mine either. I can, and have made my case using credible material. Thus far, you have provided exactly squat to support your case and it is my bet that exactly squat is all you have to support your case. Rather than defend your position, you mewl that I am making a religious argument when that, in fact, is a blatant lie.
Again, based on what. Since the supreme court is not a scientific body, their claims with regard to what unborns actually are are without meaning. Hitler claimed that jews were not, in fact, human beings but were a disease and he had the power of the law to back his claim. Do you believe that jews were, in fact, a disease because he said that they were? Our own supreme court claimed that blacks were not, in fact, human beings. They had the power of the law to back up their claim. Do you believe that blacks were not, in fact, human beings just because the court said that they weren't?
You claim to agree with the court. On what credible scientific basis do you agree with them? Or is your position, as I said earlier, entirely based on emotion?
And you failed. The argument was not poor. In fact, the argument was supported by medical textbooks. Your attempt at refuting the argument was based on nothing more than your own uneducated, uncorroborated, unsubstantiated opinion and it remains as such even now. Thus far, you have failed to even begin to rationally support your position? I am curious. What does it feel like to hold a postion that you can not defend?
Murder is defined as one human being killing another human being with initent. Since you have failed to prove that unborns are something other than human beings, it most certainly has been proved. In fact, there are people in jail right now, who are there having been charged, tried, convicted and sentenced for murder for killing unborns.
What you "consider" is irrelavent. What you can prove is what matters and thus far, you have failed to prove any part of your argument.
A court made a decision. So what? Are you under some impression that the court is infallable? The court has reversed itself some 200 times since it's doors first opened. When the court said that blacks were not human beings and had no human rights, do you believe that was a valid decision?
It is encouraging to know that when roe is overturned, you will be out in support of the decision and will immediately become anti abortion for no other reason than the court said so.
What is a child at 3 months that it wasn't at 2 months, or 1 month, or 1 week, or 1 day other than more mature? We have already established that your right to live isn't dependent upon your level of maturity. Again, you have not provided a rational defense of your position.
Let me ask again. What does it feel like to hold a position that you can't rationally defend?
