Actually, not bad, Lagboltz ... I'm sure that struck home with you.
Translation: "I, Lagboltz, am impressed by Chip's fact-based rational refutation of Top Gun's rather embarassing pro-abortionist sophistries. I hope he doesn't address me ... though I really need the attention."
No, actually you just wanted to demean me sans topically relevant content ... because you're frightened by the knowledge that I see right through both of you.
Yes ... you are frightened about something.
The truth of the matter, Lagboltz, is that you entered this thread, not motivated to correct what you allege is unscientific presentation.
That was just the tactics of the mechanics of your posts.
No, your motivation, your strategic intent, as you have revealed in response to Palerider's questions, was solely to debunk the scientific fact that a unique individual human being, a person, begins to live at the moment of conception, which you thought you could do by refuting the form, and thereby not have to utilize the pro-abortionist's ubiquitous and easily refuted sophistries as Top Gun did.
And, yes, you do this because you are a self-admitted pro-abortionist who appears to be truly bothered by his own position on the matter.
You post as if you were in ignorance of the damage done to women by abortion ... yet, between the lines, you reveal that you do comprehend that damage.
You post as if you were in ignorance of the the murderous act of abortion itself ... yet, between the lines in what you don't say, you reveal that it does bother you, including abortion from the moment of conception.
And yet you belittle, minimize, demean, sans relevant content those who present a rational, common sense, scientifically based argument that challenges you to relive the understandable guilt of your surface pro-abortionist's position, our rational, common sense, scientifically based argument for which you have no rational refutation.
And so, bombarded with the truth that restimulates your resurfacing guilt, you finally resort to postings that are nothing but mockings of those with whom you disagree, without posting one bit of topically relevant content, and I wasn't even conversing with you at the time of your unprovoked attack.
I asked you many posts ago how you felt about the rationally unconjecturable scientific fact that a person, a unique human being, begins to live at the moment of conception, and you have been silent, choosing instead to engage Palerider by posting one of the most blatant dodges of the heart of the matter I've ever read.
Rather than create posts that are nothing but ad hominem attacks as you have done here, you would do well with respect to your integrity to post topically relevant content.
If you have no refutations, if you have no valid topical content, then show some character and either admit it or remain silent.
But every dodge you make, every topically empty attack you make, only shows that you are capitulating from anxiety and lack what it takes to admit it.
So I urge you to knock off the posts like the one I'm responding to here that are solely unprovoked demeaning attacks on the poster.
And I urge you to respect this forum and post valid content that is relevant to the topic.
Thank you.
Now ...
... I've asked you a question which I've reiterated in this post.
I would like to read your answer.
