(continuation)
You clearly can't read. Here, try a few more and tell me that they describe unborns as potentiality of human life.
"an unborn child is a human being from conception is “supported by standard textbooks on embryology or human biology” T.W. SADLER, LANGMAN’S MEDICAL EMBRYOLOGY (John N. Gardner ed., 6th ed.
"The exact moment of the beginning of personhood and of the human body is at the moment of conception."
M. Allen et. al., "The Limits of Viability." New England Journal of Medicine. 11/25/93: Vol. 329, No. 22, p. 1597.
"Physicians, biologists, and other scientists agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human being—a being that is alive and is a member of the human species. There is overwhelming agreement on this point in countless medical, biological, and scientific writings." John C. Fletcher, Mark I. Evans, "Maternal Bonding in Early Fetal Ultrasound Examinations," New England Journal of Medicine, February 17, 1983.
" A zygote is the beginning of a new human being. Human development begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm ... unites with a female gamete or oocyte ... to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marks the beginning of each of us as a unique individual." Keith L. Moore, Ph.D. & T.V.N. Persaud, Md., The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 6th ed.(Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company), 2-18.
And the wait continues for you to effectively rebutt a single fact that I have presented. Are you going to do it or not? Of course you aren't. You can't beause the facts simply are not on your side.
So in addition to being a poor debater, you are a bald faced liar as wel. Do feel free to provide a single quote from me that suggests that any part of my argument is religious in nature. I am sure that you wish my argument were religious as it would then be as invalid, and pointless as your own.
And yet, you can't point to a single quote from me that suggests my argument is religious. It is you who is presenting a faith based argument, not me. I won't hazzard a guess as to which faith your argument is based on, but it most certainly is faith based.
Faith is defined as a belief that is not based on proof. Your complete inability to offer up any sort of proof to substantiate the belief that you clearly hold so dear is blatant evidence of faith.
