Reply to thread

Once again.  It isn't the woman's body that I am concerned with.  That argument is a logical fallacy.  You beg the question and simply assume that there is only one individual in the equation making a medical decison like having an ingrown toenail removed.  The fact is that what you call a medical decision is, in reality, one human being deciding to kill another.  Can you or can you not make a rational argument in support of allowing one indivual to kill another with no judicial review and no legal consequences?  The whole issue comes down to the pro choice side making a rational argument to support that position.


As to substance, take a look back through my arguments.  I am the one who provides reference to credible medical science.  I am the one who provides reference to the law and its application to the abortion question.  In fact, I am the one who actually substantiates every part of my argument.  It is you and yours whose arguments lack substance and substantiation.  Your entire argument is nothing more than a presentation of your opinion.


Back
Top