Mental constipation AND verbal diarrhea. I disagree with you and your appeals to science to support your moral views is pointless. I don't think that you should be able to run women's lives, end of story. All your pop psych attacks on me are "Erroneous and topically irrelevant" to quote a well-known pop psychologist (can I call you Pop?).
Many things can be called murder, but your selective indignation that requires others to solve the problem for YOU seems a tad hypocritical to me. Forcing women to bear babies that no one wants, babies YOU don't want, babies that will perish for lack of care, doesn't make sense to me. After you make a place for these babies in the world, in your life, then talk to me. Till then you are just another hypocritical man trying to force women to bear the brunt of your self-righteous (but non-religious) beliefs.
I think abortions are a really bad idea, but forcing women to carry and birth them into a world where they will be neglected is even worse. All the high-brow moralistic posturing in the world will not change the fact that in this culture these babies are not wanted by anybody--especially the Chips of the world--so better they die in utero than starving for food and affection in a crib or filthy apartment denied by their fathers, scorned by their society, and ignored by their government.
Where would you put the purported 40 million babies who have been aborted? How would you feed them? Clothe them, house them, and educate them? Who would you get to love them and make them into civilized people? Well, their mothers of course. Would you help them do the job? Would you make health care and daycare available to them? No, of course not, that would be socialism, right? You excoriate me, yet I've met dung beetles with more compassion than you have exhibited on this thread.
