Indeed, everyone does posses the right to life from the moment of conception.
Irrelevant, and a basis only for pro-abortionist sophistry, as it's likely intended.
The "meaning" of life is not an issue here.
The existence of a person, a unique individual human being, is what needs to be determined.
And it is the job of science, in this modern day of rational respect for the facts of truth, to make that determination ...
... And indeed science has made the determination that a person, a unique individual human being, begins to live that person's life at the moment of conception.
That's a given.
It's not a matter for rational conjecture.
A person never loses their right to life -- never.
The only time a person can rightly not be held accountable for violating another's right to life is when the person who takes another's life was acting in self-defense of his or other's lives when those lives were immediately truly threatened by the person whose life was taken.
This was determined ages ago, and has never really been a matter for rational conjecture or in need of further review.
Again, this too is already decided.
Irrelevant.
It's not how many places answers come from.
It's what answers are correct.
All irrelevant to the need for the answers to be accurately correct.
The correct answers to these questions are as I have stated above.
They have long been commonly known.
Again, the source is irrelevant.
What matters is that the answer is correct.
The answers that are correct, the answer that I've given above, those hold trump, no matter what source they come from.
Irrelevant.
Determining whether someone is alive or dead has nothing to do with the fact that murdering them is wrong.
Your rabbit trail sophistry is obvious.
No one can rightly determine if someone has lost their right to life.
That is because that right to life is not ours to take away, ever.
People who judge whether someone should be killed do so erroneously with respect to that person's right to life.
Science has made it clear that a fetus is a person, a unique individual human being, and that's not a matter for rational conjecture.
That's an obvious reality for the overwhelming vast majority of us.
DNA and life science has made it crystal clear that a fetus is not a part of the mother, but is a separate unique individual human being, a separate person from the mother.
Again, this is not a matter for rational conjecture.
Irrelevant.
A person at the end of their life, dying, is not a person at the beginning of their life, growing.
A newly conceived person is at the beginning of that person's life, growing.
There is no "dying" or "death" considerations to be rationally applied to the newly conceived human being.
Your spinning of sophistry was obvious from the beginning.
Your topical irrelevancies continue.
A growing newly conceived person is not approaching death.
Death is not an applicable allusion with regard to growing young people.
The determination of death for a person dying of natural causes, or unnatural causes, is made with appeal to science and medicine in a manner that is collectively accepted by society.
But that is inapplicable to the newly conceived human being.
Never.
But, topically irrelevant.
Stick to the topic, Hobo1: the right to life of the newly conceived, young and growing unique individual human being.
Your digression is sophistry in the making.
Maybe they do in your fantasy world, and maybe those in denial of the facts of truth in the matter may lose their way in such a discussion.
But emotionally honest people accept the unconjecturable facts of truth presented by science that a unique individual human being, a person, begins to live at the moment of conception.
And emotionally honest people recognize that this person, by virtue of being a person, a unique individual human being, possesses the right to life.
For all the praise heaped upon supposedly "intelligent and intellectual" people for their thinking ability, it's amazing how they can be so emotionally ignorant.
Too much thinking is an addiction that functions to keep one from feeling.
The result is mental masturbation of the type you have here ejaculated, Hobo1.
