Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
I wholeheartedly invite you to provide any credible scientific materials suggesting that the uborn is not a living human being, or that unborns are a part of their mother's bodies. Both suggestions are nothing more than musings and have no basis whatsoever in fact.The inherent weakness of your argument is brought into sharp relief by the fact that you are now attempting to equate a perfectly healthy, immature human being to one who is so injured or sick that no reasonable hope of recovery exists. End of life issues are not analogous to beginning of life issues.Actually, it does, whether the court recognizes it or not. A black person constitued a living human being in the 1800's as surely as they constitute a living human being today. The fact that the court failed to recognize it is to our detriment and a mark of shame on our legal system. Abortion represents the same sort of flawed legal resoning.By the way. Federal law recognizes a child, at any stage of development as a living human being. At present there is a conflict within the law that is going to have to be addressed. A single entity can not be both person and non person, human and non human at the same time. Do feel free to substantiate your claim with a larger amount of credible evidence than has been presented to disprove your claim.
I wholeheartedly invite you to provide any credible scientific materials suggesting that the uborn is not a living human being, or that unborns are a part of their mother's bodies. Both suggestions are nothing more than musings and have no basis whatsoever in fact.
The inherent weakness of your argument is brought into sharp relief by the fact that you are now attempting to equate a perfectly healthy, immature human being to one who is so injured or sick that no reasonable hope of recovery exists. End of life issues are not analogous to beginning of life issues.
Actually, it does, whether the court recognizes it or not. A black person constitued a living human being in the 1800's as surely as they constitute a living human being today. The fact that the court failed to recognize it is to our detriment and a mark of shame on our legal system. Abortion represents the same sort of flawed legal resoning.
By the way. Federal law recognizes a child, at any stage of development as a living human being. At present there is a conflict within the law that is going to have to be addressed. A single entity can not be both person and non person, human and non human at the same time. Do feel free to substantiate your claim with a larger amount of credible evidence than has been presented to disprove your claim.
