Derogatory name-calling is truly all you have.
Your projection is, of course, inapplicable.
But it appears you may have more than derogatory name-calling after all -- you have polly-parrot projection too.
Erroneous and divertive.
You know full well you suffer from misanthropy.
Then you post about how the men in this thread advise others not to commit murderous abortion ... and your misanthropy filter calls us "evil" for "controlling women", which is, of course, obviously false.
Yet you do so anyway, and through this forum in nearly every thread -- your point of view is obvious, that "evil men" lurk everywhere, waiting to descend and do harm to women.
And when I point out to you the error of your "perspective", adding that men behave badly when they coerce their partner to commit murderous abortion, you look the other way, as if the obvious fact of that matter were non-existent.
And you look the other way, because of your also unresolved "controlled-by" issues that you transfer and displace onto "men".
Rather than attack the messenger, Mare, you would do well take heed to the message ... and stop embarrassing yourself here at forum.
What you are apparently saying here is that you agree with the truth that a person, a unique individual human being, begins to live at the moment of conception, and is thereby endowed with the foundational right to life.
Either that or you disagree, and simply choose not to argue from a perspective that is an obvious loser.
Too bad you simply can't clearly and explicitly post what you truly mean.
You disagree that murdering a newly conceived person is, murder, egregiously wrong, what -- what specifically and in detail do you disagree with, Mare?
I doubt you'll be clear on the matter.
All pro-abortionists when they've realized they've lost, simply then become more and more vague.
... To murder people.
Yet you seem to not get how diabologically cold your advocation is.
Are you that emotionally detached, Mare, that you can actually recommend murder on an internet discussion board???
Such a Mengele-like cold recommendation for disposable people is indeed truly NAZI-like.
There you go again with that "evil men" insinuation, Mare.
You really would do well to do something about your misandry.
Is it "high moral ground", as you demean healthy morality, to argue against murder, Mare?!
When murder is obvious, as murderous abortion is, to argue against it is simply obviously the humane and healthy moral presentation.
That you support murder as a method of population management is holocaustic! ...
... And truly immoral.
Absolutely not!
I advocate that anyone, man or woman, who commits murderous abortion, be apprehended and incarcerated. That is appropriate penalty.
Never can one who is not in the immediate act of attempting to take another's very life be killed as prevention with impunity for the killers -- no one has that authority to deprive anyone thusly of that person's right to life.
Refusing to murder a prisoner is the right thing to do in support of the realities of rights.
Once apprehended, once incarcerated, that person is no longer a threat in any way.
Therefore killing that person, premeditatedly via capital punishment, is itself murder, which, of course, is simply wrong.
Murdering a prisoner is in violation of that prisoner's foundational right to life, and, of course, violates the realities of rights.
Once a person has served their time for murderous abortion, then if it was their first murder offense and for the murder of their own offspring, then they should be sterilized as has currently been done to others who have committed murder of their offspring.
People who perform murderous abortions, however, should never be released, as they are mass murderers of other people's offspring, and they will always, thereby, be a likely danger to society, just like any other mass murderer of post-natal people would likely be. I cannot imagine a scenario were, once murderous abortion is illegal, whereby a performer of murderous abortions would ever be granted parole.
Never.
Revenge-killing is the sociological act of murder, and murder is always wrong.
Your Biblical reference is simply an advocation of murder, an advocation by the leaders of that day to create an effective quick-fix deterent to rampant murder in the populace ...
... A deterent that hypocritically violated their own God's commandment of "thou shalt not kill" ...
... Illustrating, once again, that the Bible was written by people, not by "God".
That's right, likely murder 1.
Irrational, erroneous, unfounded, uncalled for, divertive and, of course, always a bit of a projection with you, Mare.
Look in the mirror, Mare ... and take your own advice about seeking the services of a competent mental health practitioner. 
