Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

History isn't your strong suit either, is it? Before roe, it was doctors who performed abortions who found themselves at odds with the law. The woman was considered to be another victim. The drugs and instruments used in abortion clinics are easiy traced and tracked like any other controband. In fact, we would be much more successful in closing down illegal abortion clinics today than we would have been prior to roe because of computer technology.

The rest of your statement clearly demonstrates that you don't have a clue what free choice means. Any one of us could at any time make a decision to use practically any implement to kill another person. We are not, in fact kept in farrowing cages because of that fact. We are free to kill anyone we want for any reason at any time. After we do the killing, however, we must face the consequences of our actions. If a woman decides to hire a killer to end the life of her child, she is free to do it. If she carries it out, however, there should be consequences to face as with any other killing.

More histrionics. Doesn't it embarass you to not be able to rationally defend your position?

<blockquote data-quote="palerider" data-source="post: 81944" data-attributes="member: 176">History isn&#039;t your strong suit either, is it?&nbsp; Before roe, it was doctors who performed abortions who found themselves at odds with the law.&nbsp; The woman was considered to be another victim.&nbsp; The drugs and instruments used in abortion clinics are easiy traced and tracked like any other controband.&nbsp; In fact, we would be much more successful in closing down illegal abortion clinics today than we would have been prior to roe because of computer technology.The rest of your statement clearly demonstrates that you don&#039;t have a clue what free choice means.&nbsp; Any one of us could at any time make a decision to use practically any implement to kill another person.&nbsp; We are not, in fact kept in farrowing cages because of that fact.&nbsp; We are free to kill anyone we want for any reason at any time.&nbsp; After we do the killing, however, we must face the consequences of our actions.&nbsp; If a woman decides to hire a killer to end the life of her child, she is free to do it.&nbsp; If she carries it out, however, there should be consequences to face as with any other killing.&nbsp;More histrionics.&nbsp; Doesn&#039;t it embarass you to not be able to rationally defend your position?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="palerider, post: 81944, member: 176"] History isn't your strong suit either, is it? Before roe, it was doctors who performed abortions who found themselves at odds with the law. The woman was considered to be another victim. The drugs and instruments used in abortion clinics are easiy traced and tracked like any other controband. In fact, we would be much more successful in closing down illegal abortion clinics today than we would have been prior to roe because of computer technology. The rest of your statement clearly demonstrates that you don't have a clue what free choice means. Any one of us could at any time make a decision to use practically any implement to kill another person. We are not, in fact kept in farrowing cages because of that fact. We are free to kill anyone we want for any reason at any time. After we do the killing, however, we must face the consequences of our actions. If a woman decides to hire a killer to end the life of her child, she is free to do it. If she carries it out, however, there should be consequences to face as with any other killing. More histrionics. Doesn't it embarass you to not be able to rationally defend your position? [/QUOTE]

Verification