Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
If you want to see the working model, simply look at the time before roe. Abortions happened, but those who did it faced the penalties of the law. Today, we would be much more effective in closing illegal abortion clinics because of our ability to track specific drugs and equipment. Whether you like it or not mare, it is coming. Cases are winding their way through lower courts even now that will force the court to consider not a woman's theoretical right, but specifically what, if anything is losing its life when an abortion is performed. The arguments you and other pro choicers have presented are about as good as the pro choice side can present. How do you believe that such arguments will fare in a court of law against the relentless onslaught of science, case law, and legal precedent that proves beyond any shadow of a doubt the humanity and personhood of the unborn?Even the justices who decided roe admitted that should the personhood of the unborn be proven, that roe would fall because the unborn child would be entitled to the full protection of the 14th amendment without regard to any right that a woman may invoke because the right to live is the most fundamental right that we have.
If you want to see the working model, simply look at the time before roe. Abortions happened, but those who did it faced the penalties of the law. Today, we would be much more effective in closing illegal abortion clinics because of our ability to track specific drugs and equipment.
Whether you like it or not mare, it is coming. Cases are winding their way through lower courts even now that will force the court to consider not a woman's theoretical right, but specifically what, if anything is losing its life when an abortion is performed. The arguments you and other pro choicers have presented are about as good as the pro choice side can present. How do you believe that such arguments will fare in a court of law against the relentless onslaught of science, case law, and legal precedent that proves beyond any shadow of a doubt the humanity and personhood of the unborn?
Even the justices who decided roe admitted that should the personhood of the unborn be proven, that roe would fall because the unborn child would be entitled to the full protection of the 14th amendment without regard to any right that a woman may invoke because the right to live is the most fundamental right that we have.
