Reply to thread

Erroneous and irrelevant, complete with ad hominem.


The usual post from Mare.




Erroneous.


Me thinks thou dost project too much.  :cool:





It is.




Erroneous false assumption.


You overlook the number of utilitarian moral relativists who do not care that murderous abortion by definition takes the life of the newly conceived person.


You yourself have posted in support of murdering newly conceived people in deference to utilitarian moral relativist whim, so no wonder you don't want the law to protect newly conceived people from the murderous whim of your kind.  :eek:


These are the people who currently populate prisons now.


If the sociological violations that landed them in prison were not also illegal, they would have been joined in violation by millions and millions more.


Making a sociological violation illegal drastically reduces the number people commiting that violation.


That is the goal here, Mare, not to be concerned with the "welfare" of potential violators, but to be understandably more concerned with preventing as many violations of the right to life of the newly conceived as possible.


The law is required to keep these lowest common denoninators -- utilitarian moral relativists -- from doing whatever they want at the expense of people's very life.


And the law with threat of freedom-restraining incarceration succeeds in so doing, as these LCD utilitarian moral relativists fear losing their freedom to do whatever they want more than anything, sadly, more than respecting the life of others.





Only attests to the fact that so many utilitarian moral relativists had to be put in their erroneous place.




Erroneous.


"Vitriol" is your transference and displacement fantasy, Mare, along with some of your usual projection as well.




Erroneous.


All the cards are on the table.


This is really all there is to the matter.


Your paranoia, that something's "hidden", only attests to your difficulty in accepting the truth of the matter.




Erroneous.


When it comes to determining that a person exists and is alive, religion is not a determiner of those facts.  Religion is incapable of making that factually accurate truthful determinating, and religions vary on their unfounded opinion on the matter, making them not only not universal in their appeal, but divisive and conflict generating in their disagreement.


It's all about facts, Mare, the facts of truth.


Science is modern humanity's sole accepted authority with regard to revealing the facts of truth about this matter.


Science's determination that a person begins to live at conception is universally accepted everywhere.


That scientific fact of truth is presently actively pushing Roe v Wade into the dumpster.


It's only a matter of time.


Back
Top