Misapplied, and thus erroneously irrelevant.
Translation: "Those who see through our smokescreen will call us on our obvious errors, and the best we can do is call them names, which, sadly, does indicate that we've surrended in point of fact."
You dodge my direct questions, Lagboltz, direct questions that require you to be emotionally honest.
No wonder you attack emotions.
Emotional denial is the pro-abortionist's foundational orientation.
Strange, Lagboltz -- there aren't too many people around who would call the rational and accurate professorial point-of-fact evaluation of "More erroneous, out of context, mental masturbation from Lagboltz, as usual." to be anything close to being the irrational emotional outburst you allege it to be.
Common sense would then tell me that you might be the kind of person who would try to convince someone that a cat is a dog, if convincing them of that obvious errroneousness was necessary for you to remain in emotional denial.
Indeed, you are always the one to errantly initiate reference of emotion, like you just can't wait to interject emotion into the discussion as if it was a "bad" thing.
No wonder you see emotion as "bad" -- facing honestly your emotions in the matter will cost you your "precious" denial!
Your projection is, thus, obvious ... and, you thereby reveal that your psychological defense mechanisms ... are weakening. 
