Reply to thread

Your problem is that you believe your personal definition has any bearing on the issue.


 


If you have just finished a course in biology, you should realize that a zygote is more than DNA.




You also aren't very observant.  It is the anti choice side that is sticking to hard scientific and legal facts.  It is the pro choice side that is lying, attacking, and arguing one logical fallacy after another and you are no different.  If you had looked at this thread, what would be apparent is that one side is presenting facts and then supporting them with credible materials and one side is not.  Which side is apparently stuck with nothing more than an emotional defense?


Back
Top