Erroneous and irrelevant.
I have not quoted a "Wiki article", despite you pro-abortionist's continued lame attempt to stipulate such an irrelevant absolute nothing.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically formulated refutation, then post it.
False.
Since your premise is false, your conclusion is false.
The clear, accurate, scientific reality is derived purely from an accurate application of the scientific method presents beyond rational conjecture that a person, a unique individual human being, begins to live at the moment of conception, and that is what I've posted in the opening post, pure and simple.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically formulated refutation, then post it.
False on both counts.
I'm not misquoting anyone.
I chose to defend the legitimate science of the opening post against the ubiquitous sophistry presented by you pro-abortionists, "it" does not defend my "purposes", ... though your projection here indicates that you concoct your pro-abortionist's sophistry in hope of serving your purposes.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically formulated refutation, then post it.
False.
We aren't "forced" to do anything.
And, ageism isn't new, though you'd like to belittling demean it with such a fantasy to suit your pro-abortionist purposes.
The fact is that age descrimination -- ageism -- happens all the time ... and my guess is that you pro-abortionists are specifically just as murder-happy with regard to the very old as you are with regard to the very young here.
Why you people are so obsessed with lopping off the chronological ends of the human race is an interesting study in phobia-based neurotic competition for what you may deem as scarce material resources.
But murder by any other name would smell as foul.
And the fact that you find it amusing to be called on your murderous advocation by the precise bias -- ageism -- that you employ as an irrationalization for murderous abortion ... really does imply a sociopathic element to your position.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically refutation to the opening post, then post it.
Maybe, but I doubt it.
If you do feel guilt from time to time regarding your support of murderous abortion, then that's normal, and to your credit.
If you don't feel guilt about your support of murderous abortion, then such emotional detachment is reflective of psychopathology.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically refutation to the opening post, then post it.
I feel no guilt about any of my pro-life positions.
Your assumption is, as usual for a pro-abortionist, erroneous.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically refutation to the opening post, then post it.
False, and, irrelevant.
Here you illustrate further the typical pro-abortionist tactic of straying from the point to escape a losing argument.
But, briefly, I feel no guilt about war because I don't support non-defensive war. I oppose the Iraq war because that was merely GWB and the neo-cons murderous thievery of Iraq's oil distribution rights. No matter how much we needed to receive our continuous share of Iraqi crude that Saddam was planning on selling to the Chinese as soon as sanctions against him changing trading partners ended, Bush's blatant murderous attack to prevent the depression-causing loss of that irreplaceable light sweet Iraqi crude is inexcusable.
I also oppose the tactics employed in Afghanistan to ferret out Osama bin Laden, tactics which employ indiscriminate bombing that cost the lives of innocent people, many of whom are little children.
So you see, Samsara15, I have nothing here to feel guilty about.
You, murderous pro-abortionist, on the other hand ... ... .
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically refutation to the opening post, then post it.
False, and, irrelevant.
Here, once again, you illustrate further the typical pro-abortionist tactic of straying from the point to escape a losing argument.
But, briefly, I feel no guilt about capital punishment because I oppose capital punishment, plain and simple. Capital punishment is merely state-sponsored murder, as premeditatively intentionally killing an un-armed convict who is bound and guarded and thus presents no immediate threat to anyone simply cannot be irrationalized as "self defense" in any sense of the word, and thus, true to my pro-life philosophy, I find such sociological murder to be horrific.
So you see, Samsara15, I have nothing here to feel guilty about here either.
Now don't you feel silly about your erroneous assumptions? You should.
You, murdeorus pro-abortionist, on the other hand ... ... .
Your diversions remain irrelevant. The subject is about the right to life of pre-natal people. Try to stick to the topic, if you can.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically refutation to the opening post, then post it.
Obviously erroneous.
It is beyond rational common sense to assume that I would feel guilty about abortion!?
You are obviously projecting again, as logically the only people who should feel guilt in this matter are those pro-abortionists who support murderous abortion.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically refutation to the opening post, then post it.
