Irrelevant and meaningless and erroneous.
The size of an organization is irrelevant.
You call them "mainstream" scientists, so that's obviously an indication of the fact that they are not.
You call them "the voice of science in the US", which again likely means that they don't speak for anyone but their organization, which is obviously pro-abortion.
Yes, I "dare" to label them left-wing because they obviously are, first because I know about them and they are indeed left-wing in politics, meaning pro-abortionist, and second because you say they aren't!
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically formulated refutation to the opening post, then please post it.
Erroneous.
I label them left-wing because they are.
That they remain silent on murderous abortion only substantiates my ascertation.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically formulated refutation to the opening post, then please post it.
Well, there you go -- you couldn't have given a better example of their pro-abortionist politics!
They favor killing newly conceived people on which to do experiments -- an entire organization which favors Dr. Mengele's approach to laboratory management.
Game over, Samsara15 -- you've hoisted yourself on your own petard! 
... 
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically formulated refutation to the opening post, then please post it.
Erroneous.
From your previous statement it is now even more obvious that I know who they are and that their politics as an organization is leftist pro-abortion.
It is you who either doesn't know who they are, or who is purposely misrepresenting the truth of their politics.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically formulated refutation to the opening post, then please post it.
Irrelevant.
I posted the truth in the opening post.
You can expect me to defend it against your pro-abortionist sophistries.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically formulated refutation to the opening post, then please post it.
False. Unsubstantiated. Unproven.
But if you insist it's wrong, why do you keep refusing to ... well, you know ...
... Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically formulated refutation to the opening post, then please post it. 
Irrelevent, Erroneous, and meaningless.
Again, if you have a clear accurate on-point scientifically formulated refutation to the opening post, then please post it.
