False.
This thread is about the right to life of newly conceived people, as the title and substantive content of the opening post make undeniably clear.
That utilitarian moral relativists may feel "controlled" in their sexual activity is just their way of saying they don't want to hear about the reality of murderous abortion.
That people will have to change their relationship behaviors to stop murdering people via abortion is merely an incidental ... and I, for one, argue for bringing to market the new state-of-the-art pharmaceuticals that are 100% effective in preventing conception, so that ultimately people won't have to restrain their sexual activity forever.
This debate is, however, very much like that debate that existed back in Galileo's time, when those who supported science clearly presented that the Earth revolved around the Sun, but the vast majority of old guard religious couldn't accept what this new discovery meant, and so they denied the reality of it vehemently, even to the point of doing harm to the messengers.
Today, those of us who recognize what science has made undeniably clear -- that a person, a unique individual human being, begins to live at the moment of conception -- have embraced all that that means and are ready to progress boldly into the future in support of the newly conceived's right to life ...
... Whereas the old guard pro-abortionists are taking on the role of the religious in their ideology-based denial of the obvious reality validated by science, and they do so vehmently, even to the point of denigrating the messengers who rightly educate them on the reality of murderous abortion.
