Reply to thread

Well we all know that's you who is in reality both red faced from receiving your 36+ year long butt kickin' from the US SUPREME COURT, PLANNED PARENTHOOD and of course THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THEMSELVES... and Bibled in you thinly veiled religious ideology.:eek:


Be that as it may facts are still facts and I use them to show that abortion is not the only thing of it's kind that is totally legal because due to necessity and/or extremely critically important conflicting interests.


When knowingly by pre-strike analysis innocent little children are allowed to be killed as collateral damage... that's the very definition of a child being put to death without any right to prior judicial review. 


When someone is alive and could be kept alive but they are not that is often because they are no longer "VIABLE". Still a human... but cannot live on their own without life support. This is much the same as with a fertilized egg up to "VIABILITY". The woman is the life support machine and the embryo has not even remotely developed enough brain function to be "VIABLE".


As far as the Constitution it doesn't have to say anything about "extraordinary means". To be consistent with your obviously inconsistent argument saying "one has the right to life" would mean we should do everything in our power to maintain that life no matter how degraded. Because knowing there will always be future medical advancements almost every medical problem would someday have a cure if life was just continued on.


Your "no extraordinary means" position would also translate over into saying when penicillin first came out that you wouldn't have to give that to a person ready to die from a raging infection because that would (at the time) have been new and extraordinary means to keep that person alive.


These are just some of the many reasons why you've been a loser for at least the last 36+ years... ;)


[media=youtube]lsknXsm2eHo[/media]



Back
Top